GoFundMe acct started to help 'Sweet Cakes' fight off Gay Nazi's and state

[Marxist]

Sweden is in no way socialist though..

Mmmm, you should study up. It very much is, by any conventional definition.
Mixed Economy Economics Help

Do workers own the means of production?

There is more to Marxism than that, like the "people" owning what's necessary to live like water, power, sewer, healthcare, etc.

I know, and I refer you to anarchism.

Which isn't related to the discussion at hand at all. Lots of people here want that though, they are all about "freedom" without knowing what that actually is.

I referred you to anarchism since I disagree with using the state to achieve communism.

 

[Papageorgio]

He brings up Venezuela and when that fails he brings up Paris, when that fails, he brings up Ukraine, now that is a fail...what will he bring up next?

Utte bullshit, and Venezuela isn't even socialist, let's also remember Paris/Ukraine/etc failed due to violence against them.. Idiot.

So, once again, you brought up Venezuela, not me. You brought up Ukraine and Paris. Please tell me a successful socialist country.

 

[Marxist]

He brings up Venezuela and when that fails he brings up Paris, when that fails, he brings up Ukraine, now that is a fail...what will he bring up next?

Utte bullshit, and Venezuela isn't even socialist, let's also remember Paris/Ukraine/etc failed due to violence against them.. Idiot.

So, once again, you brought up Venezuela, not me. You brought up Ukraine and Paris. Please tell me a successful socialist country.

The only socialist examples are in the past and failed due to violence against them. Ukraine? The free territory, which was constantly attacked. The Paris commune? The anarchists in Spain?

 

[Papageorgio]

He brings up Venezuela and when that fails he brings up Paris, when that fails, he brings up Ukraine, now that is a fail...what will he bring up next?

Utte bullshit, and Venezuela isn't even socialist, let's also remember Paris/Ukraine/etc failed due to violence against them.. Idiot.

So, once again, you brought up Venezuela, not me. You brought up Ukraine and Paris. Please tell me a successful socialist country.

The only socialist examples are in the past and failed due to violence against them. Ukraine? The free territory, which was constantly attacked. The Paris commune? The anarchists in Spain?

So it is failed because it can't defend itself.

 

[Marxist]

He brings up Venezuela and when that fails he brings up Paris, when that fails, he brings up Ukraine, now that is a fail...what will he bring up next?

Utte bullshit, and Venezuela isn't even socialist, let's also remember Paris/Ukraine/etc failed due to violence against them.. Idiot.

So, once again, you brought up Venezuela, not me. You brought up Ukraine and Paris. Please tell me a successful socialist country.

The only socialist examples are in the past and failed due to violence against them. Ukraine? The free territory, which was constantly attacked. The Paris commune? The anarchists in Spain?

So it is failed because it can't defend itself.

Yeah, ok, you haven't even bothered to look into anything. Each of the examples had defenders, the people fighting.. They were simply overwhelmed.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Mmmm, you should study up. It very much is, by any conventional definition.
Mixed Economy Economics Help

Do workers own the means of production?

There is more to Marxism than that, like the "people" owning what's necessary to live like water, power, sewer, healthcare, etc.

I know, and I refer you to anarchism.

Which isn't related to the discussion at hand at all. Lots of people here want that though, they are all about "freedom" without knowing what that actually is.

I referred you to anarchism since I disagree with using the state to achieve communism.

Ah, I see, so this is all a localized collective thing for you then? Boy, that is tough row to hoe.

 

[Marxist]

Do workers own the means of production?

There is more to Marxism than that, like the "people" owning what's necessary to live like water, power, sewer, healthcare, etc.

I know, and I refer you to anarchism.

Which isn't related to the discussion at hand at all. Lots of people here want that though, they are all about "freedom" without knowing what that actually is.

I referred you to anarchism since I disagree with using the state to achieve communism.

Ah, I see, so this is all a localized collective thing for you then? Boy, that is tough row to hoe.

 

[SUPERMAN1929]

Do workers own the means of production?

There is more to Marxism than that, like the "people" owning what's necessary to live like water, power, sewer, healthcare, etc.

I know, and I refer you to anarchism.

Which isn't related to the discussion at hand at all. Lots of people here want that though, they are all about "freedom" without knowing what that actually is.

I referred you to anarchism since I disagree with using the state to achieve communism.

Ah, I see, so this is all a localized collective thing for you then? Boy, that is tough row to hoe.

Don't talk with Marxist. He might be the only other person on here with views equally ignorant to yours.

 

[Marxist]

There is more to Marxism than that, like the "people" owning what's necessary to live like water, power, sewer, healthcare, etc.

I know, and I refer you to anarchism.

Which isn't related to the discussion at hand at all. Lots of people here want that though, they are all about "freedom" without knowing what that actually is.

I referred you to anarchism since I disagree with using the state to achieve communism.

Ah, I see, so this is all a localized collective thing for you then? Boy, that is tough row to hoe.

Don't talk with Marxist. He might be the only other person on here with views equally ignorant to yours.

Yeah, I'm the ignorant one..

 

[PaintMyHouse]

There is more to Marxism than that, like the "people" owning what's necessary to live like water, power, sewer, healthcare, etc.

I know, and I refer you to anarchism.

Which isn't related to the discussion at hand at all. Lots of people here want that though, they are all about "freedom" without knowing what that actually is.

I referred you to anarchism since I disagree with using the state to achieve communism.

Ah, I see, so this is all a localized collective thing for you then? Boy, that is tough row to hoe.

Don't talk with Marxist. He might be the only other person on here with views equally ignorant to yours.

So far he's kicking your ass, he's just idealist but his notions are sound, yours stop at I'm white and male so I'm fucked, which is nothing like the truth.

 

[SUPERMAN1929]

I know, and I refer you to anarchism.

Which isn't related to the discussion at hand at all. Lots of people here want that though, they are all about "freedom" without knowing what that actually is.

I referred you to anarchism since I disagree with using the state to achieve communism.

Ah, I see, so this is all a localized collective thing for you then? Boy, that is tough row to hoe.

Don't talk with Marxist. He might be the only other person on here with views equally ignorant to yours.

So far he's kicking your ass, he's just idealist but his notions are sound, yours stop at I'm white and male so I'm fucked, which is nothing like the truth.

No. I know I'm fine because I'm white and male. I'm trying to create an equal world. I don't think giving hand outs and causing further discrimination will fix things. I have sets of principles I believe in and will stick to where you have exceptions based on race. That's the difference.

 

[Papageorgio]

He brings up Venezuela and when that fails he brings up Paris, when that fails, he brings up Ukraine, now that is a fail...what will he bring up next?

Utte bullshit, and Venezuela isn't even socialist, let's also remember Paris/Ukraine/etc failed due to violence against them.. Idiot.

So, once again, you brought up Venezuela, not me. You brought up Ukraine and Paris. Please tell me a successful socialist country.

The only socialist examples are in the past and failed due to violence against them. Ukraine? The free territory, which was constantly attacked. The Paris commune? The anarchists in Spain?

So it is failed because it can't defend itself.

Yeah, ok, you haven't even bothered to look into anything. Each of the examples had defenders, the people fighting.. They were simply overwhelmed.

So none have been successful. Thanks for the admission.

 

[Marxist]

Utte bullshit, and Venezuela isn't even socialist, let's also remember Paris/Ukraine/etc failed due to violence against them.. Idiot.

So, once again, you brought up Venezuela, not me. You brought up Ukraine and Paris. Please tell me a successful socialist country.

The only socialist examples are in the past and failed due to violence against them. Ukraine? The free territory, which was constantly attacked. The Paris commune? The anarchists in Spain?

So it is failed because it can't defend itself.

Yeah, ok, you haven't even bothered to look into anything. Each of the examples had defenders, the people fighting.. They were simply overwhelmed.

So none have been successful. Thanks for the admission.

They were successful until they were violently slaughtered, Fucking moron.

 

[Marxist]

Which isn't related to the discussion at hand at all. Lots of people here want that though, they are all about "freedom" without knowing what that actually is.

I referred you to anarchism since I disagree with using the state to achieve communism.

Ah, I see, so this is all a localized collective thing for you then? Boy, that is tough row to hoe.

Don't talk with Marxist. He might be the only other person on here with views equally ignorant to yours.

So far he's kicking your ass, he's just idealist but his notions are sound, yours stop at I'm white and male so I'm fucked, which is nothing like the truth.

No. I know I'm fine because I'm white and male. I'm trying to create an equal world. I don't think giving hand outs and causing further discrimination will fix things. I have sets of principles I believe in and will stick to where you have exceptions based on race. That's the difference.

Further discrimination? Please, explain how food stamps cause discrimination

 

[SUPERMAN1929]

So, once again, you brought up Venezuela, not me. You brought up Ukraine and Paris. Please tell me a successful socialist country.

The only socialist examples are in the past and failed due to violence against them. Ukraine? The free territory, which was constantly attacked. The Paris commune? The anarchists in Spain?

So it is failed because it can't defend itself.

Yeah, ok, you haven't even bothered to look into anything. Each of the examples had defenders, the people fighting.. They were simply overwhelmed.

So none have been successful. Thanks for the admission.

They were successful until they were violently slaughtered, Fucking moron.

So failure?

 

[SUPERMAN1929]

I referred you to anarchism since I disagree with using the state to achieve communism.

Ah, I see, so this is all a localized collective thing for you then? Boy, that is tough row to hoe.

Don't talk with Marxist. He might be the only other person on here with views equally ignorant to yours.

So far he's kicking your ass, he's just idealist but his notions are sound, yours stop at I'm white and male so I'm fucked, which is nothing like the truth.

No. I know I'm fine because I'm white and male. I'm trying to create an equal world. I don't think giving hand outs and causing further discrimination will fix things. I have sets of principles I believe in and will stick to where you have exceptions based on race. That's the difference.

Further discrimination? Please, explain how food stamps cause discrimination

Go to some of the threads about race and see how PMH supports college trips at public schools only for blacks and all kinds of assistance but only for blacks, no one else. That's racist. I believe assistance should be based of income not skin tone.

 

[Marxist]

The only socialist examples are in the past and failed due to violence against them. Ukraine? The free territory, which was constantly attacked. The Paris commune? The anarchists in Spain?

So it is failed because it can't defend itself.

Yeah, ok, you haven't even bothered to look into anything. Each of the examples had defenders, the people fighting.. They were simply overwhelmed.

So none have been successful. Thanks for the admission.

They were successful until they were violently slaughtered, Fucking moron.

So failure?

How is that failure if they successfully worked, provided for people, and they were simply killed while fighting for their freedom. I suppose capitalism is a failure when a capitalist nation gets slaughtered in warfare.

 

[Marxist]

Ah, I see, so this is all a localized collective thing for you then? Boy, that is tough row to hoe.

Don't talk with Marxist. He might be the only other person on here with views equally ignorant to yours.

So far he's kicking your ass, he's just idealist but his notions are sound, yours stop at I'm white and male so I'm fucked, which is nothing like the truth.

No. I know I'm fine because I'm white and male. I'm trying to create an equal world. I don't think giving hand outs and causing further discrimination will fix things. I have sets of principles I believe in and will stick to where you have exceptions based on race. That's the difference.

Further discrimination? Please, explain how food stamps cause discrimination

Go to some of the threads about race and see how PMH supports college trips at public schools only for blacks and all kinds of assistance but only for blacks, no one else. That's racist. I believe assistance should be based of income not skin tone.

I'm ok with that, and it sounds like revenge for the centuries of discrimination.

 

[SUPERMAN1929]

Don't talk with Marxist. He might be the only other person on here with views equally ignorant to yours.

So far he's kicking your ass, he's just idealist but his notions are sound, yours stop at I'm white and male so I'm fucked, which is nothing like the truth.

No. I know I'm fine because I'm white and male. I'm trying to create an equal world. I don't think giving hand outs and causing further discrimination will fix things. I have sets of principles I believe in and will stick to where you have exceptions based on race. That's the difference.

Further discrimination? Please, explain how food stamps cause discrimination

Go to some of the threads about race and see how PMH supports college trips at public schools only for blacks and all kinds of assistance but only for blacks, no one else. That's racist. I believe assistance should be based of income not skin tone.

I'm ok with that, and it sounds like revenge for the centuries of discrimination.

I really don't care because blacks won't be equal in my lifetime but it's just another inconsistency in the lefts belief system. It promotes a large group of people that feel owed something like a spoiled group of kids that are very violent.

 

[pismoe]

its making the playing field level Superman and its being aimed at young kids that aren't black or of the special group . Also doesn't matter to me as my kids are in their 40s , I'm just interested because I can see whats being done . Course , its the wrong way to go but that's how the lefties work !!