Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
What Tea Party Activist/Republican would ever call Gloria to represent them?
Answer? No one.
Apparently this woman refused to answer the question "Did you first try any of the other accusers lawyers".
And even some liberal women are going this is too far fetched. Mika from Morning Joe called the press conference by the bimbo and Gloria a sideshow.
Great quote from her:
"Mika Brzezinski On Fourth Cain Accusers Press Conference: This Is A Pathetic Sideshow
Videoby James Crugnale | 9:24 am, November 8th, 2011
» 80 comments Mika Brzezinski criticized Herman Cain accuser Sharon Bialek Tuesday on Morning Joe, calling her press conference a pathetic sideshow and asking why she didnt speak out before when Cain was head of the National Restaurant Association. He was powerful before he was running for president. And nobody spoke out then.
So what does that say about them? Because if someone is a predator a sexual predator and they do something to you and you dont speak out, youre letting it go.
And clearly this woman and Gloria Allred are very interested in the limelight right now and taking this on, and I wonder what their reasons are.
Co-host Willie Geist had wondered if Brzezinski was questioning the accusers motives in coming forward.
I still dont get why (Herman Cain) is even at the top of the list, Brzezinski opined. I dont understand your party. We can go on for the politics of that, but youre the expert. You can explain it. I dont get it. I dont even think he should be there but as far as this is concerned, he was head of the National Restaurant Association.
Why now?
What Tea Party Activist/Republican would ever call Gloria to represent them?
Answer? No one.
Apparently this woman refused to answer the question "Did you first try any of the other accusers lawyers".
And even some liberal women are going this is too far fetched. Mika from Morning Joe called the press conference by the bimbo and Gloria a sideshow.
Great quote from her:
"Mika Brzezinski On Fourth Cain Accuser’s Press Conference: ‘This Is A Pathetic Sideshow’
Videoby James Crugnale | 9:24 am, November 8th, 2011
» 80 comments Mika Brzezinski criticized Herman Cain accuser Sharon Bialek Tuesday on Morning Joe, calling her press conference a “pathetic sideshow” and asking why she didn’t speak out before when Cain was head of the National Restaurant Association. “He was powerful before he was running for president. And nobody spoke out then.
So what does that say about them? Because if someone is a predator — a sexual predator — and they do something to you and you don’t speak out, you’re letting it go.
And clearly this woman and Gloria Allred are very interested in the limelight right now and taking this on, and I wonder what their reasons are.”
Co-host Willie Geist had wondered if Brzezinski was questioning the accuser’s motives in coming forward.
“I still don’t get why (Herman Cain) is even at the top of the list,” Brzezinski opined. “I don’t understand your party. We can go on for the politics of that, but you’re the expert. You can explain it. I don’t get it. I don’t even think he should be there but as far as this is concerned, he was head of the National Restaurant Association.”
Why now?
What Tea Party Activist/Republican would ever call Gloria to represent them?
Answer? No one.
Apparently this woman refused to answer the question "Did you first try any of the other accusers lawyers".
And even some liberal women are going this is too far fetched. Mika from Morning Joe called the press conference by the bimbo and Gloria a sideshow.
Great quote from her:
"Mika Brzezinski On Fourth Cain Accusers Press Conference: This Is A Pathetic Sideshow
Videoby James Crugnale | 9:24 am, November 8th, 2011
» 80 comments Mika Brzezinski criticized Herman Cain accuser Sharon Bialek Tuesday on Morning Joe, calling her press conference a pathetic sideshow and asking why she didnt speak out before when Cain was head of the National Restaurant Association. He was powerful before he was running for president. And nobody spoke out then.
So what does that say about them? Because if someone is a predator a sexual predator and they do something to you and you dont speak out, youre letting it go.
And clearly this woman and Gloria Allred are very interested in the limelight right now and taking this on, and I wonder what their reasons are.
Co-host Willie Geist had wondered if Brzezinski was questioning the accusers motives in coming forward.
I still dont get why (Herman Cain) is even at the top of the list, Brzezinski opined. I dont understand your party. We can go on for the politics of that, but youre the expert. You can explain it. I dont get it. I dont even think he should be there but as far as this is concerned, he was head of the National Restaurant Association.
Why now?
Here's MY point. Many conservatives have attempted (rather clumsily, and in error, I might add) to paint Gloria Allred as a partisan who's motivation is to hurt Cain because he's conservative (and maybe even because he's a black conservative0.
However, the evidence is clear that Allred's motivation has more to do with holding powerful men accountable when they abuse their power and take advantage of women. Representing Ginger Lee against Democrat Representative Anthony Weiner of NY is one case. She also called on Bill Clinton to resign after the Monica Lewinski case became public, and that was a consensual relationship which Lewinski actively pursued.
Now, why didn't Sharon Bialek speak out 14 years ago? I think it's clear that three things were true. One, she didn't have any real proof because there were no other witnesses. Two, she didn't work for the NRA at the time, and probably didn't want to burn a possible future employment reference. And three, she almost certainly didn't have any knowledge that Cain was doing this kind of thing to other women. And to that last reason, she likely knew nothing about it for years, until recently when the experiences of other women came to light, even though they were unwilling to come forward and deal with the character assassinations that are now coming HER way.
What Tea Party Activist/Republican would ever call Gloria to represent them?
Answer? No one.
Apparently this woman refused to answer the question "Did you first try any of the other accusers lawyers".
And even some liberal women are going this is too far fetched. Mika from Morning Joe called the press conference by the bimbo and Gloria a sideshow.
Great quote from her:
"Mika Brzezinski On Fourth Cain Accusers Press Conference: This Is A Pathetic Sideshow
Videoby James Crugnale | 9:24 am, November 8th, 2011
» 80 comments Mika Brzezinski criticized Herman Cain accuser Sharon Bialek Tuesday on Morning Joe, calling her press conference a pathetic sideshow and asking why she didnt speak out before when Cain was head of the National Restaurant Association. He was powerful before he was running for president. And nobody spoke out then.
So what does that say about them? Because if someone is a predator a sexual predator and they do something to you and you dont speak out, youre letting it go.
And clearly this woman and Gloria Allred are very interested in the limelight right now and taking this on, and I wonder what their reasons are.
Co-host Willie Geist had wondered if Brzezinski was questioning the accusers motives in coming forward.
I still dont get why (Herman Cain) is even at the top of the list, Brzezinski opined. I dont understand your party. We can go on for the politics of that, but youre the expert. You can explain it. I dont get it. I dont even think he should be there but as far as this is concerned, he was head of the National Restaurant Association.
Why now?
perhaps it's because he's running for the Office of President of the United States. A position in which he will be responsible for the lives of 400 Million Americans, not to mention the potential of impacting the Billions of people on the planet.
This isn't a mayoral, County Commissioner or even gubernatorial race. This is the person who will represent our country... the most powerful single person in the world. EVERY CANDIDATE SHOULD BE VETTED AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE. We SHOULD know about our candidates.
The bottom line is that Cain probably fucked up... Just like Weiner, Just like Edwards and Just like Gary Hart. They all paid the price for their mistakes... Clinton was impeached by the House of Representatives.
But Cain should get a free pass because he's a Conservative? Bullshit. If Proven false, he will have passed that part of the gauntlet like path to the Presidency. If proven true... he will be what he deserves... a footnote in the GOP Primary.
What Tea Party Activist/Republican would ever call Gloria to represent them?
Answer? No one.
Apparently this woman refused to answer the question "Did you first try any of the other accusers lawyers".
And even some liberal women are going this is too far fetched. Mika from Morning Joe called the press conference by the bimbo and Gloria a sideshow.
Great quote from her:
"Mika Brzezinski On Fourth Cain Accusers Press Conference: This Is A Pathetic Sideshow
Videoby James Crugnale | 9:24 am, November 8th, 2011
» 80 comments Mika Brzezinski criticized Herman Cain accuser Sharon Bialek Tuesday on Morning Joe, calling her press conference a pathetic sideshow and asking why she didnt speak out before when Cain was head of the National Restaurant Association. He was powerful before he was running for president. And nobody spoke out then.
So what does that say about them? Because if someone is a predator a sexual predator and they do something to you and you dont speak out, youre letting it go.
And clearly this woman and Gloria Allred are very interested in the limelight right now and taking this on, and I wonder what their reasons are.
Co-host Willie Geist had wondered if Brzezinski was questioning the accusers motives in coming forward.
I still dont get why (Herman Cain) is even at the top of the list, Brzezinski opined. I dont understand your party. We can go on for the politics of that, but youre the expert. You can explain it. I dont get it. I dont even think he should be there but as far as this is concerned, he was head of the National Restaurant Association.
Why now?
perhaps it's because he's running for the Office of President of the United States. A position in which he will be responsible for the lives of 400 Million Americans, not to mention the potential of impacting the Billions of people on the planet.
This isn't a mayoral, County Commissioner or even gubernatorial race. This is the person who will represent our country... the most powerful single person in the world. EVERY CANDIDATE SHOULD BE VETTED AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE. We SHOULD know about our candidates.
The bottom line is that Cain probably fucked up... Just like Weiner, Just like Edwards and Just like Gary Hart. They all paid the price for their mistakes... Clinton was impeached by the House of Representatives.
But Cain should get a free pass because he's a Conservative? Bullshit. If Proven false, he will have passed that part of the gauntlet like path to the Presidency. If proven true... he will be what he deserves... a footnote in the GOP Primary.
the fact that you say "probably" is the problem.
There is no evidence...no witnesses.....just allegations.
Yet you see him as likely guilty.
The media paints him as guilty.
Heck, Chris Matthews cme right out and said
"it is OBVIOUS he did something terribly wrong. He should admit he was drunk and move on"
Yet...for every man that is accused of commiting sexual harrassment there are probably twice as many that were accused of it but didnt.
What Tea Party Activist/Republican would ever call Gloria to represent them?
Answer? No one.
Apparently this woman refused to answer the question "Did you first try any of the other accusers lawyers".
And even some liberal women are going this is too far fetched. Mika from Morning Joe called the press conference by the bimbo and Gloria a sideshow.
Great quote from her:
"Mika Brzezinski On Fourth Cain Accusers Press Conference: This Is A Pathetic Sideshow
Videoby James Crugnale | 9:24 am, November 8th, 2011
» 80 comments Mika Brzezinski criticized Herman Cain accuser Sharon Bialek Tuesday on Morning Joe, calling her press conference a pathetic sideshow and asking why she didnt speak out before when Cain was head of the National Restaurant Association. He was powerful before he was running for president. And nobody spoke out then.
So what does that say about them? Because if someone is a predator a sexual predator and they do something to you and you dont speak out, youre letting it go.
And clearly this woman and Gloria Allred are very interested in the limelight right now and taking this on, and I wonder what their reasons are.
Co-host Willie Geist had wondered if Brzezinski was questioning the accusers motives in coming forward.
I still dont get why (Herman Cain) is even at the top of the list, Brzezinski opined. I dont understand your party. We can go on for the politics of that, but youre the expert. You can explain it. I dont get it. I dont even think he should be there but as far as this is concerned, he was head of the National Restaurant Association.
Why now?
Here's MY point. Many conservatives have attempted (rather clumsily, and in error, I might add) to paint Gloria Allred as a partisan who's motivation is to hurt Cain because he's conservative (and maybe even because he's a black conservative0.
However, the evidence is clear that Allred's motivation has more to do with holding powerful men accountable when they abuse their power and take advantage of women. Representing Ginger Lee against Democrat Representative Anthony Weiner of NY is one case. She also called on Bill Clinton to resign after the Monica Lewinski case became public, and that was a consensual relationship which Lewinski actively pursued.
Now, why didn't Sharon Bialek speak out 14 years ago? I think it's clear that three things were true. One, she didn't have any real proof because there were no other witnesses. Two, she didn't work for the NRA at the time, and probably didn't want to burn a possible future employment reference. And three, she almost certainly didn't have any knowledge that Cain was doing this kind of thing to other women. And to that last reason, she likely knew nothing about it for years, until recently when the experiences of other women came to light, even though they were unwilling to come forward and deal with the character assassinations that are now coming HER way.
that is what I see as her motivation reagrdless of ideology.
However, I disagree wuith the part where you say "when they abuse their power"
Instead I see her as one that doesnt care if they did or didnt...as long as she can make it appeare that they did.
And THAT is my beef with her.
Sexual harrassment is not a good deal for the gal. Mustang, rep coming your way for courage in defending Ms. Gloria Allred. She represented the unwitting girlfriend Amber Frey of the guy on death row in California for the murder of his wife Laci Peterson and their unborn child.
Yes, she is a liberal; many lawyers are. But first, she is a bona fide professional person when entrusted with people's cases.
perhaps it's because he's running for the Office of President of the United States. A position in which he will be responsible for the lives of 400 Million Americans, not to mention the potential of impacting the Billions of people on the planet.
This isn't a mayoral, County Commissioner or even gubernatorial race. This is the person who will represent our country... the most powerful single person in the world. EVERY CANDIDATE SHOULD BE VETTED AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE. We SHOULD know about our candidates.
The bottom line is that Cain probably fucked up... Just like Weiner, Just like Edwards and Just like Gary Hart. They all paid the price for their mistakes... Clinton was impeached by the House of Representatives.
But Cain should get a free pass because he's a Conservative? Bullshit. If Proven false, he will have passed that part of the gauntlet like path to the Presidency. If proven true... he will be what he deserves... a footnote in the GOP Primary.
the fact that you say "probably" is the problem.
There is no evidence...no witnesses.....just allegations.
Yet you see him as likely guilty.
The media paints him as guilty.
Heck, Chris Matthews cme right out and said
"it is OBVIOUS he did something terribly wrong. He should admit he was drunk and move on"
Yet...for every man that is accused of commiting sexual harrassment there are probably twice as many that were accused of it but didnt.
All such things start with allegations. Like I said... If he did nothing, why the payout? If he made the payout(s), then that information should be known by the voting public.
It would be different if Allred went after Democrats like she went after conservative Republicans. Then conservatives could take these charges against Cain more seriously.
Breaking: Ginger Lee Breaks Silence On Weiner - YouTube
the fact that you say "probably" is the problem.
There is no evidence...no witnesses.....just allegations.
Yet you see him as likely guilty.
The media paints him as guilty.
Heck, Chris Matthews cme right out and said
"it is OBVIOUS he did something terribly wrong. He should admit he was drunk and move on"
Yet...for every man that is accused of commiting sexual harrassment there are probably twice as many that were accused of it but didnt.
All such things start with allegations. Like I said... If he did nothing, why the payout? If he made the payout(s), then that information should be known by the voting public.
First, he didn't make the payout. The Board of Directors did. Second, the severance was part of a separation agreement. There is no evidence that the severance was because of any accusations. That's speculation by the press and/or statements by anonymous sources. Third, I have negotiated separation agreements and twice during the negotiations some suggestions of future allegations of sexual harassment against other employees of mine were made. In each case I asked if any laws were broken and the answer was no. I asked if an increased severance would save us all the trouble and the answer was yes. Why the payout? Because at that level it's cheaper to settle than it is to find fact, the employee was satisfied, and the company was able to move on.
All such things start with allegations. Like I said... If he did nothing, why the payout? If he made the payout(s), then that information should be known by the voting public.
First, he didn't make the payout. The Board of Directors did. Second, the severance was part of a separation agreement. There is no evidence that the severance was because of any accusations. That's speculation by the press and/or statements by anonymous sources. Third, I have negotiated separation agreements and twice during the negotiations some suggestions of future allegations of sexual harassment against other employees of mine were made. In each case I asked if any laws were broken and the answer was no. I asked if an increased severance would save us all the trouble and the answer was yes. Why the payout? Because at that level it's cheaper to settle than it is to find fact, the employee was satisfied, and the company was able to move on.
Then let the facts become public... no big deal.
It would be different if Allred went after Democrats like she went after conservative Republicans. Then conservatives could take these charges against Cain more seriously.
Breaking: Ginger Lee Breaks Silence On Weiner - YouTube
Wow it works.....
I have rdean on my ignore list...
He is the only one worthy of that honor...
It would be different if Allred went after Democrats like she went after conservative Republicans. Then conservatives could take these charges against Cain more seriously.
Breaking: Ginger Lee Breaks Silence On Weiner - YouTube
The lawyer has nothing to do with it, it's all about the client. The lawyer isn't on trial, nor would be. The lawyer is simply there to give the best possible legal counsel.
With that said, the client, Ms. Bliak (sp) is a teabagger mom. Attending recent teabagger events, where Cain was BTW.
Your insinuation is baseless.
