Please explain exactly who I am attributing "beliefs and assumptions" onto, and who those individuals are.
First and foremost me, but it seems to be a general trend with anyone you don't agree with. I think it's really amusing that you attribute so many beliefs to people that are inaccurate. If you didn't you would probably find there is more common ground than you think.
You rely wayyyy too much on one persons research & book for your opinions about global warming. When I asked for backup evidence you cited his bibliography and got a list of people who support him from his home-made website.
Again that is a false assumption which you continue to insist upon. I know as well as you do to put all or most stock in the idea that one theory is the truth over all others is silly. All I have done is continue to point out there are other scientifcally legitamte theories for what we're seeing. And they warrant attention before the next liberal quack claims we must take drastic measures to avoid the 'emergency'. RGS is correct when he points out there is very little good evidence to support the idea that it is predominantly man makeing the Earth warmer.
A little common sense alone should lend credance to the idea that there are other possibilities as to why the earth is warming. History being the big one. We know it has been significantly warmer than it is now far prior to industrialization. Greenland was named Greenland for a reason you know. Scientific theories continue to emerge as well regarding sun cycles and there effect on climate. Do you honestly believe the evidence of ice ages and warming trends that Earth's temperature was constant and non-volatile right up until industrialization? You may very well expose yourself to other ideas though you have also show you will remain truly obstinate about it insisting, despite little to know mreit, that basically anything oppossed to anthropogenic global warming is non-credible. It isn't me who has put all my stock in one theory with blinders on to all other ideas. It's you. Do really think those that believe an alternative theory is most likely want to be wrong? It is my best interest and that of world's that every scientific avenue is exhausted before declaring we didn't create this problem.