Global Ice loss accelerating.

I get it, you can’t back your posts and it embarrassed you! You can clear this up and just admit nasa isn’t a climate team
Did you hear the new Republican position on Global Warming is they know it's real just don't give a shit? At least now they're being honest.
 
Did you hear the new Republican position on Global Warming is they know it's real just don't give a shit? At least now they're being honest.
It's not a coincidence every argument you make is a moral argument, bobo. Funny, but not a coincidence.
 
Did you hear the new Republican position on Global Warming is they know it's real just don't give a shit? At least now they're being honest.

Almost no one gives a shit. They're dealing with real world issues.
Jobs, money, crime, inflation, Biden's drooling idiocy.
No one is interested in wasting their time or money on idiotic green whining.
 
Hey Chart-*******, lying with graphics guy!
I note your graphs are from 'IMBIE,' so I went THERE to have a look at the Real story.
Of course, Not your misleading opinion/result.

imbie.org

""The results of IMBIE 2016 were published in 2018 for Antarctica and in 2019 for Greenland. By combining the results of 50 different surveys produced by 89 participants from 50 international organisations, we produced reconciled time-series of ice sheet mass balance, showing that the Antarctic and Greenland Ice Sheets contributed 17.8 ± 1.8 mm to global sea level rise between 1992 and 2017.

The Antarctic Ice Sheet Lost 2720 ± 1390 billion tonnes of ice between 1992 and 2017, with a 4-fold Increase in the Rate of Mass Loss between the first five years of our survey (1992-1997) and the Last five years of our survey (2012-2017). West Antarctica experienced the largest change with the rate of mass loss rising from 53 ± 29 billion tonnes per year at the start of our survey to 159 ± 26 billion tonnes per year at the end of our survey due to increased ocean melting at Pine Island and Thwaites Glaciers causing glacier speedup.
The Antarctic Peninsula also experienced Increased ice losses following the Collapse of Larsen B and Wilkins ice shelves with the rate of ice loss Increasing from 7 ± 13 billion tonnes to 33 ± 16 billion tonnes per year. Finally, East Antarctica, where mass balance fluctuations are primarily driven by snowfall accumulation, has remained close to a state of balance with a small gain of 5 ± 46 billion tonnes of ice per year between 1992 and 2017.

The Greenland Ice Sheet lost 3902 ± 342 billion tonnes of ice between 1992 and 2018. Over half of Greenland’s ice losses comes from increased meltwater runoff driven by warmer atmospheric conditions, with the remainder originating from dynamical imbalance. The Rate of ice loss has Dramatically Increased over the course of our survey, rising from 26 ± 27 billion tonnes per year in the early 1990s to 244 ± 28 billion tonnes per year between 2012 and 2017.

These two assessments reveal that ice losses from the Greenland and Antarctic Ice Sheets are currently tracking the upper range of the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report (AR5) sea level rise projections, which predicts an additional contribution to sea level rise between 14.5 and 23 cm above the central predictions by the end of the century."""
- - -

You can't debate me/the truth, only post/billboard your misleading picture shows.
`

The Antarctic Ice Sheet Lost 2720 ± 1390 billion tonnes of ice between 1992 and 2017,

That's terrible!!! How many tonnes are left?
 
The Antarctic Ice Sheet Lost 2720 ± 1390 billion tonnes of ice between 1992 and 2017,

That's terrible!!! How many tonnes are left?


The libs are exercising their right to remain silent on this. Providing context to their claim would eliminate its impact on the Low Information Majority that they are working on.
 
The libs are exercising their right to remain silent on this. Providing context to their claim would eliminate its impact on the Low Information Majority that they are working on.
Enough to cover my home in several feet of sea water.
The Antarctic Ice Sheet Lost 2720 ± 1390 billion tonnes of ice between 1992 and 2017,

That's terrible!!! How many tonnes are left?
Enough to cover my home in several feet of sea water.
 
Tell us when the Sea level actually starts to rise. Great Lakes shows you a Liar
!!! LOFL. !!!
The Great Lakes is NOT "Sea Level" YOU STUPENDOUS MORON.
Neither is the Great Salt Lake.
UN.. believable knee-Jerk dope.
Dropped out of the 3rd grade.
Trying to surpass FrusaderCrank and TrollsterParrot.

`
 
Last edited:
!!! LOFL. !!!
The great lakes is NOT "Sea Level" YOU STUPENDOUS MORON.
Neither is the Great Salt Lake.
UN.. believable knee-Jerk dope.

`
Crick said sea level is connected to the Great Lakes, now you say no? Make up your mind. Btw, moving goal posts is so cliché
 
Crick said sea level is connected to the Great Lakes, now you say no? Make up your mind. Btw, moving goal posts is so cliché
They are connected by the St Lawrence River. But that does not put the lakes at sea level. Why do you think the river flows?
 
From the polar caps to the glaciers of Europe, Asia and South America, global warming is melting the planet’s ice faster than ever and speeding the inundation of the world’s coastlines.

New research shows the annual melt rate grew from 0.8 trillion tons in the 1990s to 1.3 trillion tons by 2017, and has accelerated most in the places with the most ice—the Greenland and Antarctic ice shelves and sheets.

Those massive systems of land and sea-based ice are melting as fast as the worst-case climate scenarios in major global climate reports, said Thomas Slater, a co-author of the new study in The Cryosphere that measured the meltdown from 1994 to 2017, which covers a timespan when every decade was warmer than the previous one and also includes the 20 warmest years on record.




*****************
Thank Heaven’s we have a wonderful new President who is taking this threat seriously.


How come Venice's canals are running dry? Your heroes said Venice would be underwater....
 
How come Venice's canals are running dry? Your heroes said Venice would be underwater....

Simple answer is, the effects of climate change aren't linear. Different places experience different climate events at different times, but over time, the global mean impacts everyone.
 
Simple answer is, the effects of climate change aren't linear. Different places experience different climate events at different times, but over time, the global mean impacts everyone.


So, that's why Greenland froze while North America thawed, because Co2 clumped over North america and fled Greenland.

Thanks!!!
 
So, that's why Greenland froze while North America thawed, because Co2 clumped over North america and fled Greenland.

Thanks!!!

Like I said, it's not linear. But ask Europeans, North Africans, or South Asians if they believe climate change is a hoax.
 
Like I said, it's not linear. But ask Europeans, North Africans, or South Asians if they believe climate change is a hoax.


Wordsmithing again.

Climate change is not a hoax.

Co2 does not cause climate change.

Co2 did not freeze Greenland and thaw North America at the same time....

Co2 is the HOAX

and that HOAX is well documented....


To fudge or not to fudge, that was the question for the Co2 fraud in 2005, as highly correlated satellite and balloon data showed precisely NO WARMING in the atmosphere despite rising Co2 (and growing Urban Heat Sink Effect - cities warm as they grow, which is ALL the organic unfudged "warming" the Co2 fraud ever had).

Theory - increasing atmospheric Co2 causes warming

The data = NOPE

Science says THEORY REJECTED

The Co2 HOAX said FUDGE THE DATA


 
That's terrible!!! How many tonnes are left?

Crick has been shown the data many times, but he eats too many slices of Swiss Cheese to remember it, here is the true picture:

cumulative-ice-loss-antarctica-1992-2017.png


change-in-ice-mass-antarctica-1992-2017.png

LINK to the IMBIE Data Downloads
 
Climate change is not a hoax.

Okay, you're sane so far.

Co2 does not cause climate change.

The fuck it does not. The science on that dates back to the 19th Century, you scientifically

Co2 is the HOAX

Carbon dioxide is a hoax, eh? It's part of our atmosphere -- it was 300 ppm or 0.03% of our atmosphere in the early part of the 20th Century; it's now 0.04% (400+ ppm) and rapidly rising, and that is what causes the greenhouse effect. It's pure science. Our atmosphere is composed of gases. CO2 is a gas - a heat-trapping one at that. Increase CO2 in the atmosphere, and well, you increase the heat that fails to escape earth's atmosphere.

and that HOAX is well documented....

Nope. See a shrink and tell him/her to up your medication.
 

Forum List

Back
Top