Georgia To Bolster Gay Marriage Refusals ..Religious Grounds..Though Secular Grounds Compelling Too

[Katzndogz]

The only sensible solution is freedom. Gays have the freedom to marry and others have to freedom not to accept it. Certainly at the very least, not to participate.

 

[JakeStarkey]

State PA laws will make the determination.

 

[Preacher]

Good for my home state.

 

[Skylar]

And thread number 44. This board is becoming a monument to enabling mental illness.

 

[Skylar]

Everyone, meet Greg Kirk. Greg Kirk, everyone.

The Republican state senator out of Americus has officially become the face of Georgia’s opposition to same-sex marriage, as the AJC reports that the former Southern Baptist pastor plans on introducing legislation that would protect businesses and public employees who object to gay marriage on religious grounds....And Lt. Gov. Casey Cagle, who’s been throwing red meat to evangelicals by touting his opposition to same-sex marriage in recent fundraising efforts in the run-up to his bid for governor in 2018, appears to be on board with it... Georgia lawmakers striking back against same-sex marriage ruling - Georgia Voice - Gay & LGBT Atlanta

They might want to look up the Infant Doctrine/necessities and contract law....or this information: PRINCE'S TRUST 2010 YOUTH INDEX SURVEY or this thread: Is Gay Marriage Void? New York v Ferber (1982) Etc. or this thread: If States Defined Why They Give Tax Breaks to Marrieds....

Lets see. The 'Infancy Doctrine' is for children being obligated by contracts, such as child actors. No law nor court recognizes any child obligated to any contract when their parents get married. Rendering any citation of the 'Infancy Doctrine' pseudo-legal gibberish regarding marriage.

The Princes Trust Study never so much as mentions mothers. Fathers. Gays. Gay marriage. Same sex parents. Or measures the effects of any kind of parents. Making it irrelevant.

And New York v. Ferber was about kiddy porn. It never so much as mentions marriage. Making it irrelevant.

And lastly, the Supreme Court found that the right to marry isn't predicated on children or the ability to have them. And applies just as fully to those who can't have kids or choose not to have them. Rendering your entire argument irrelevant for like the 4th time.

There's a reason why every prediction you've ever made on the outcome of any case has been wrong: you genuinely don't know what the fuck you're talking about.

 

[SwimExpert]

They are more than welcome to try and pass this nonsense but don't be too shocked if the business community pushes back rather harshly.

I really think you should enter every one of Sil's threads with your devil gif.

 

[mdk]

They are more than welcome to try and pass this nonsense but don't be too shocked if the business community pushes back rather harshly.

I really think you should enter every one of Sil's threads with your devil gif.

43 threads could never fit into a gif. lol

 

[Skylar]

They are more than welcome to try and pass this nonsense but don't be too shocked if the business community pushes back rather harshly.

I really think you should enter every one of Sil's threads with your devil gif.

43 threads could never fit into a gif. lol

44. Sil had to appease the voices. And they commanded her to start a new one today.

 

[Silhouette]

They are more than welcome to try and pass this nonsense but don't be too shocked if the business community pushes back rather harshly.

I really think you should enter every one of Sil's threads with your devil gif.

Yes, because the devil is one who opposes motherless or fatherless marriages for kids and angels wish girls to be devoid of mothers and boys to be devoid of fathers...for life.

To be clear everyone, the devil is someone who opposes two men playing "husband and wife".. Angels support two men or two women playing husband and wife...
..now...repeat that to yourself 100 times until the opposite of reality becomes reality...see how that works!

LGBT gaslighting...give it a try! (or you're a BIGOT! and a HATER!..)

 

[JakeStarkey]

Sil, honey, we won't tolerate your gaslighting of the LGBT and their friends. You are not going to succeed.

 

[mdk]

They are more than welcome to try and pass this nonsense but don't be too shocked if the business community pushes back rather harshly.

I really think you should enter every one of Sil's threads with your devil gif.

Yes, because the devil is one who opposes motherless or fatherless marriages for kids and angels wish girls to be devoid of mothers and boys to be devoid of fathers...for life.

To be clear everyone, the devil is someone who opposes two men playing "husband and wife".. Angels support two men or two women playing husband and wife...
..now...repeat that to yourself 100 times until the opposite of reality becomes reality...see how that works!

LGBT gaslighting...give it a try! (or you're a BIGOT! and a HATER!..)

You're extra nutty today. I might have to get out an EpiPen. lol

 

[SwimExpert]

Yes, because the devil is one who opposes motherless or fatherless marriages for kids and angels wish girls to be devoid of mothers and boys to be devoid of fathers...for life.

To be clear everyone, the devil is someone who opposes two men playing "husband and wife".. Angels support two men or two women playing husband and wife...
..now...repeat that to yourself 100 times until the opposite of reality becomes reality...see how that works!

LGBT gaslighting...give it a try! (or you're a BIGOT! and a HATER!..)

So angsty.

 

[Silhouette]

Well, how do you feel about respecting the beliefs & practices of Christians if they are required to respect your beliefs & practices?

 

[JakeStarkey]

Well, how do you feel about respecting the beliefs & practices of Christians if they are required to respect your beliefs & practices?

You have to follow the PA laws. Go into a gay bakery and demand a wedding cake celebrating only hetero marriage.

 

[Silhouette]

Well, how do you feel about respecting the beliefs & practices of Christians if they are required to respect your beliefs & practices?

You have to follow the PA laws. Go into a gay bakery and demand a wedding cake celebrating only hetero marriage.

You also have to follow 1st Amendment laws... hmmm...I wonder which would be dominant when tested?

 

[JakeStarkey]

Well, how do you feel about respecting the beliefs & practices of Christians if they are required to respect your beliefs & practices?

You have to follow the PA laws. Go into a gay bakery and demand a wedding cake celebrating only hetero marriage.

You also have to follow 1st Amendment laws... hmmm...I wonder which would be dominant when tested?

There is no 1st Amendment right in relation overthrowing LGBT marriage. SCOTUS has spoken. The states are rewriting the laws. Courts cases will rule on those cases. Until SCOTUS overturns its ruling (very unlikely), LGBT marriage remains.

 

[Silhouette]

There is no 1st Amendment right in relation overthrowing LGBT marriage. SCOTUS has spoken. The states are rewriting the laws. Courts cases will rule on those cases. Until SCOTUS overturns its ruling (very unlikely), LGBT marriage remains.

1. There is a 1st Amendment right that says LGBT beliefs cannot force Christian beliefs to bow before them or enable them when strictly forbidden in the Bible. You're aware the Bible's Old and New Testament hold reminders of the account of an entire city destroyed because of the spread of the homosexual CULTure within it? And how Christians were reminded in Jude 1 of the New Testament of Jesus Christ (not old weird jewish laws from the Old Testament...a history citation for the New) to never enable the spread of a homosexual culture under threat of eternal damnation of their soul?

2. New York vs Ferber (1982) found that a person's constitutional right is affirmed..unless in a very specific case. And that case is, unless their right harms children either physically or psychologically. Guess what "gay marriage" does? It strips a child even of the hope, for LIFE, of having either a mother or father present. And since children come in both genders...this study poses a huge problem for "LGBT marriage"... PRINCE'S TRUST 2010 YOUTH INDEX SURVEY A psychological prison without the possibility of parole for life, is unusual cruelty. At least with single parents the children can maintain hope that they will see their gender as a parent one day.

 

[mdk]

Too bad Sil is unfamiliar with Proverbs 12:22

 

[JakeStarkey]

Sil is so unfamiliar with the Bible, our Constitution, social history, and so on.

 

[Debra K]

]Everyone, meet Greg Kirk. Greg Kirk, everyone.

The Republican state senator out of Americus has officially become the face of Georgia’s opposition to same-sex marriage, as the AJC reports that the former Southern Baptist pastor plans on introducing legislation that would protect businesses and public employees who object to gay marriage on religious grounds....And Lt. Gov. Casey Cagle, who’s been throwing red meat to evangelicals by touting his opposition to same-sex marriage in recent fundraising efforts in the run-up to his bid for governor in 2018, appears to be on board with it. . . .

[snip]

. . . How can one set of behaviors or beliefs force another set of beliefs to bow before it?

Silhouette: You appear to be a one-issue "red meat" poster. In many threads you have exposed both your hatred of people who are different from you and your opposition to those people enjoying equal rights under the law. Thus, your question is ironic. Clearly, you relish the thought of imposing your "set of behaviors or beliefs" on everyone else in society through the operation of our laws (and forcing the rest of us to bow before you). You want everyone to bow before your bigoted theory that heterosexual marriages & parents are somehow better than homosexual marriages & parents. Accordingly, you demonize homosexuals and seek the abuse the power of government as a means to place them into a class of individuals who are undeserving of the same rights secured by our federal constitution that you enjoy. Bigotry & hypocrisy, even when it comes wrapped in Jesus paper and adorned with a religious bow, is still bigotry & hypocrisy.