tinydancer
Diamond Member
thank you for the offer but I don't do cyber sex.Engage me any time.
Neither do I. So back to the OP Tiller was a most interesting killer.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
thank you for the offer but I don't do cyber sex.Engage me any time.
try a lanolin based personal lubricant, it should soften you ageing camels toe.probably because its the only time you get moist.I am a Canadian you pompous ass. And I know this drill very well. I enjoy this debate yearly.
Alas I prefer leather and not just debate. Pity you.
what term was your abortion?One has to remember he believed he was doing the work of the Lord. Talk about freaky. He loved the babies he killed. He loved them dearly.
bollocks, 'Nathan was born at 23 weeks. If I'd known then what I do now, I'd have wanted him to die in my arms' | Society | The Observeram I supposed to shed a tear for a red blob of jelly?
RIP Dr Tiller
Late term. You know. The kid is kicking the shit out of your belly and rolling around inside you and you're making jokes that he's the next Beckham.
I'm against murder, even if the victim is a murderer. I would have favored dismemberment of Tiller instead. Let him feel the same kind of pain he inflicted on countless babies who could not defend themselves. The man was pure scum, as are the ghouls on this thread who think he was some kind of hero.
So Tiller loved bringing in bus loads of chicks and killed the babies .....and now according to Plas we should honor him.
Your people murdered him..
My People?
read the article dullard and understand that once the foetus is no longer attached to the host I regard it as life, the question then is viability as this poor woman found out.Well now you have gone from a blob of jelly to a human being havent you? Nice jump.
Late term abortions in the UK and America are legal if they are within the defining protocol.Medically assessed non viability is one of the reasons a woman in your country may exercise her constitutional right to abort .
I am a Canadian you pompous ass. And I know this drill very well. I enjoy this debate yearly.
Tell all Plasmaread the article dullard and understand that once the foetus is no longer attached to the host I regard it as life, the question then is viability as this poor woman found out.
Late term abortions in the UK and America are legal if they are within the defining protocol.Medically assessed non viability is one of the reasons a woman in your country may exercise her constitutional right to abort .
I am a Canadian you pompous ass. And I know this drill very well. I enjoy this debate yearly.
oh today you are just Canadian....I see
I really don't care what the law says...
Yes, which is typical of most on the right, and comes as no surprise.
But regardless your ignorance of, and contempt for, the Constitution and its case law, abortion is in fact not murder, nor criminal, where the state is appropriately and thankfully prohibited from interfering in the private lives of citizens.
That you and others on the right seek to expand the size and authority of government at the expense of individual liberty also comes as no surprise.
I really don't care what the law says...
Yes, which is typical of most on the right, and comes as no surprise.
But regardless your ignorance of, and contempt for, the Constitution and its case law, abortion is in fact not murder, nor criminal, where the state is appropriately and thankfully prohibited from interfering in the private lives of citizens.
That you and others on the right seek to expand the size and authority of government at the expense of individual liberty also comes as no surprise.
Taking me out of context. Not surprising from a left wing nut.
To me it is illegal and immoral to take a life, spin all you want. I respect the laws but I can disagree. To God it is murder, I respect the Constitution and the laws of the land. However, I did not say I wanted to expand anything, if you could quote my whole posts you would know that but that is your dishonesty and unethical tactics comes as no surprise.
Next time try to be honest in quoting, wait... You aren't smart enough to make points honestly.
I really don't care what the law says in excusing on or the other, they are both morally and criminally wrong.
Yes, which is typical of most on the right, and comes as no surprise.
But regardless your ignorance of, and contempt for, the Constitution and its case law, abortion is in fact not murder, nor criminal, where the state is appropriately and thankfully prohibited from interfering in the private lives of citizens.
That you and others on the right seek to expand the size and authority of government at the expense of individual liberty also comes as no surprise.
Taking me out of context. Not surprising from a left wing nut.
To me it is illegal and immoral to take a life, spin all you want. I respect the laws but I can disagree. To God it is murder, I respect the Constitution and the laws of the land. However, I did not say I wanted to expand anything, if you could quote my whole posts you would know that but that is your dishonesty and unethical tactics comes as no surprise.
Next time try to be honest in quoting, wait... You aren't smart enough to make points honestly.
Nothings taken out of context, youre simply being held accountable for your positions, something most on the right refuse to do:
I really don't care what the law says in excusing on or the other, they are both morally and criminally wrong.
And this backpedal post doesnt mitigate the fact that you and most on the right have nothing but contempt for the privacy rights jurisprudence that prohibits the state from interfering with personal decisions.
Either that or you dont understand what the term criminally wrong means and what it implies.
read the article dullard and understand that once the foetus is no longer attached to the host I regard it as life, the question then is viability as this poor woman found out.
Well now you have gone from a blob of jelly to a human being havent you? Nice jump.
Late term abortions in the UK and America are legal if they are within the defining protocol.Medically assessed non viability is one of the reasons a woman in your country may exercise her constitutional right to abort .
Taking me out of context. Not surprising from a left wing nut.
To me it is illegal and immoral to take a life, spin all you want. I respect the laws but I can disagree. To God it is murder, I respect the Constitution and the laws of the land. However, I did not say I wanted to expand anything, if you could quote my whole posts you would know that but that is your dishonesty and unethical tactics comes as no surprise.
Next time try to be honest in quoting, wait... You aren't smart enough to make points honestly.
Nothing’s ‘taken out of context,’ you’re simply being held accountable for your positions, something most on the right refuse to do:
I really don't care what the law says in excusing on or the other, they are both morally and criminally wrong.
And this backpedal post doesn’t mitigate the fact that you and most on the right have nothing but contempt for the privacy rights jurisprudence that prohibits the state from interfering with personal decisions.
Either that or you don’t understand what the term “criminally wrong” means and what it implies.
More dishonesty from you, I have no contempt for the privacy rights. The law is what it is, that is the way it goes. What you do in your bedroom or what you wanting to kill a child is on you, not me. My conscience is clean, you have to deal with it.
I don't think government should pay for personal decisions in birth control or paying for your personal decisions on what type of birth control to use. They should not be involved in paying for your personal decision to abort a child. They government should not pay for your personal decision to use drugs, when on welfare. The government should not pay for your unemployment to get unemployment when you decide to use drugs and fail the drug test.
I'm all for privacy, it is not the government's business if I make a personal decision to purchase a gun. It is not the government's business if I make a personal decision to make phone calls and to who I make them to.
The killing of the unborn is as wrong as killing the doctor that choose to kill babies. Neither is right.
As far as the rest of the right, I don't know what or imply I know what they believe. You seem to like to lump everyone on one side or the other.
Not seem why you are upset that I hate the killing of the unborn, seems a little over the top.
Sent from my iPad using an Android.
I'm a sicko for suggesting it, but Tiller wasn't a sicko for DOING it? I think the sicko here is you.I'm against murder, even if the victim is a murderer. I would have favored dismemberment of Tiller instead. Let him feel the same kind of pain he inflicted on countless babies who could not defend themselves. The man was pure scum, as are the ghouls on this thread who think he was some kind of hero.
yes because dismemberment is totally better than being shot...sicko
I'm a sicko for suggesting it, but Tiller wasn't a sicko for DOING it? I think the sicko here is you.I'm against murder, even if the victim is a murderer. I would have favored dismemberment of Tiller instead. Let him feel the same kind of pain he inflicted on countless babies who could not defend themselves. The man was pure scum, as are the ghouls on this thread who think he was some kind of hero.
yes because dismemberment is totally better than being shot...sicko
I'm a sicko for suggesting it, but Tiller wasn't a sicko for DOING it? I think the sicko here is you.yes because dismemberment is totally better than being shot...sicko
til wasn't a murderer.... murder is a legally defined term and he was acting legally.....
and your verbiage and the verbiage of the radical right ends up revving its sickos into doing something like murdering a doctor.
and then you say you're somehow better than terrorists. they think their religious zealotry justifies murder, too.