Gays in the millitary?? No fair!!

Do you even have any stats on how many soldiers will be uncomfortable with gays or not?

Do you even have any stats that state that most soldiers have a problem with the current DADT policy? The policy only seems problematic for gays.

So if most soldiers don't mind it must be a good policy?

You have any real arguments instead of appeal to majority?

The Bass' argument is simple, DADT is not causing the military any problems, its only problematic for faggots that want to tell everyone and their mama that they're gay but what about those troops who don't want to know?
 
Hetero people don't talk about sex?

Are you SURE you served in the military rather than the Boy Scouts?


Hetero troops don't wear their sexuality on their foreheads you jackass, most troops served and do their jobs and don't use their sexuality as activism. Faggots will not. They already have the option to serve and keep their homosexuality to themselves, thats what the rules are and they know this when they signed up. All people who join the service have to forfeit and sacrifice something when they join because they are no longer a part of the civilian world, if faggots can't do it they don't need to join, simple and plain.
 
So telling straights to suck it up= evil. Telling gays to suck it up=OK.

People in the military have to suck up a lot and to ask them to suck up feeling uncomfortable in a communal shower full of people that are attracted to people of the same sex is retarded and violates their privacy.

:lol: You're getting desperate. Especially when you keep insisting that if it was repealed suddenly it would be full of gay man. How exactly does the current system not violate their privacy?

You liberals are under the false impression that lifting DADT is going to go real smooth without any problems despite not nearing the majority of the troops voice their opinions on the matter.

What proof do you have that most troops would hate it as much as you do?

Heteros don't make openly professing their sexuality a big deal, most don't even discuss, what good is it going to do the military and gays if they're allowed to say they're gay? Its of no benefit to the military whatsoever.

Except they'd have more troops and translators.

The military id an organization thats suppose to protect our country, not a proving ground for gay activism.

Straw man. You know that's not what it would make it.

gays know the rules, if they can't follow the rules they shouldn't join, end of story,

No, we can always try to change the warrantless rules.

the military is not a democracy and those of us who have joined and served in the military know this.

Non-Sequiter. Stop trying to deflect.

Everyone, gay and straight, that joins the military joins with the understanding that for the time they will be serving they will have to give up and forfeit a number of freedoms that are not permissible once they swear in. Once you swear in you're bound to a contract and you have already agreed to obey every rule and regulation that comes with it, so its the faggots that need to suck it up

So we should just blindly follow the rules that are there? There's a name for thickies like you.

Lawful Stupid - Television Tropes & Idioms

You're whole argument of why we should keep the rules basically amounts to a.troops will feel uncomfortable (how many, you won't say, nor any indication on how much). and b. That it's all ready a rule.

You're starting to sound more and more like the fuckers who didn't want blacks in the military either.


The straights may be uncomfortable but I'd give them a week.

Based on what?

Based on the fact that most soldiers are not as obsessed over homosexuals as you are and that they're not as weak as you'd take them for.
 
Hetero people don't talk about sex?

Are you SURE you served in the military rather than the Boy Scouts?


Hetero troops don't wear their sexuality on their foreheads you jackass, most troops served and do their jobs and don't use their sexuality as activism. Faggots will not. They already have the option to serve and keep their homosexuality to themselves, thats what the rules are and they know this when they signed up. All people who join the service have to forfeit and sacrifice something when they join because they are no longer a part of the civilian world, if faggots can't do it they don't need to join, simple and plain.

Really? Hetero troops don't wear their sexuality on their foreheads?

Shit........that means all the really hot chicks I was stationed with were all wrong then, as most of them kinda did that very same thing if they were single.

Oh yeah........let's talk about the integration of women in the military to combat units. Remember the problems that caused? Shit........for a while, it was kinda being worn on their sleeves douchebag.

Then..........there's the times that I've gone and gotten in a contest with some of my fellow sailors to see who could get laid the most times while in the red light district.

In Alicante Spain, I held the record. 7 times in one night, between sunset and 4 am.

Then........there's the single dudes who talk about all the ass they'd gotten over the weekend......

Like I said, are you SURE you were in the military and not the Cub Scouts?
 
Mr Bass and the GayBiker can't even spell it correctly. It's HETRO not "hetero". Both of you are obviously products of the failed public schiool system. Mr Bass has an excuse in that he is a Negro and the majority of Negro people have great difficulty spelling words that don't start with the phrase "Hey man...". On the other hand the GayBiker is just plain mentally incompetent.
 
Mr Bass and the GayBiker can't even spell it correctly. It's HETRO not "hetero". Both of you are obviously products of the failed public schiool system. Mr Bass has an excuse in that he is a Negro and the majority of Negro people have great difficulty spelling words that don't start with the phrase "Hey man...". On the other hand the GayBiker is just plain mentally incompetent.

Yeah...........you're a hell of a spokesperson..........considering that this observation is being made by a gay pedophile priest who was kicked out of the church, and is now hiding out in Canada.

Sure.......you're really mentally competent.

By the way, why the rift with Chucked Ass? He refuse to blow you last nite?
 
Do you even have any stats that state that most soldiers have a problem with the current DADT policy? The policy only seems problematic for gays.

So if most soldiers don't mind it must be a good policy?

You have any real arguments instead of appeal to majority?

The Bass' argument is simple, DADT is not causing the military any problems, its only problematic for faggots that want to tell everyone and their mama that they're gay but what about those troops who don't want to know?

Third person references to one's self are gay.... just sayin ... It's queer.
 
Third person references were originally used by royalty, as they didn't want to have any connection to the peasants, and so they referred to themselves in the third person, to keep themselves apart from the conversation.

Eventually, here in America, it started to be used by the top 5 percent of the people, as they considered themselves royalty.

Nowadays? Its used exclusively by third rate douchebags who are doing the rest of us a favor, by keeping their douchebaggery to themselves.

Chucking Ass is the self proclaimed King of Douchebaggery! All hail Chucked Ass, Douchebag King for Life!
 
Last edited:
Personally? I'd like to know who is and isn't.

That way, if I was a homophobic racist asshole like Ass Chucker, I could avoid the shower when they were in there.

I think the reason he doesn't like the policy, is because now, his bullshit is gonna be known by everyone.
 
Personally? I'd like to know who is and isn't.

That way, if I was a homophobic racist asshole like Ass Chucker, I could avoid the shower when they were in there.

I think the reason he doesn't like the policy, is because now, his bullshit is gonna be known by everyone.

Personal attack, personal attack, thats all you can muster up. Perhaps you want DADT lifted to mnake up for your 20 years of pent up frustration.
 
Last edited:
So if most soldiers don't mind it must be a good policy?

You have any real arguments instead of appeal to majority?

The Bass' argument is simple, DADT is not causing the military any problems, its only problematic for faggots that want to tell everyone and their mama that they're gay but what about those troops who don't want to know?

Third person references to one's self are gay.... just sayin ... It's queer.

More personal attacks, the Bass rests his case, until you faggots and faggot lovers come up with a convicing argument other than liberal BS propaganda and gay activism the Bass will not waste his time chastise grown adults incapable of putting up a valid argument.
 
Mr Bass and the GayBiker can't even spell it correctly. It's HETRO not "hetero". Both of you are obviously products of the failed public schiool system. Mr Bass has an excuse in that he is a Negro and the majority of Negro people have great difficulty spelling words that don't start with the phrase "Hey man...". On the other hand the GayBiker is just plain mentally incompetent.

Have you went to professional help to cure your pedophilia?
 
In the "new" politically correct USA Mr Bass, being a Negro, is a member of the "protected" race of people. White Americans are just plain old people with no special privileges. Too bad.............
 
The Bass' argument is simple, DADT is not causing the military any problems, its only problematic for faggots that want to tell everyone and their mama that they're gay but what about those troops who don't want to know?

Third person references to one's self are gay.... just sayin ... It's queer.

More personal attacks, the Bass rests his case, until you faggots and faggot lovers come up with a convicing argument other than liberal BS propaganda and gay activism the Bass will not waste his time chastise grown adults incapable of putting up a valid argument.

When you consider that all other NATO countries allow openly gay people to serve, then couple that with the fact that we currently have a war with Saudi speaking people, and some of the gays they want to kick out are Arabic language experts, of which we have only 500 in the military.

Compound that to the fact there are 2 wars on, and it takes a lot of manpower, which means allowing gays to serve openly, so that we don't need to institute another draft.

Oh yeah.........never mind the fact that it would make our military just that much stronger, because racist douchebag homophobic people such as yourself would get out, taking along their old standards and ancient mores with them.

Yep.........getting rid of racists and homophobic people is a good start in my opinion.
 
:lol: You're getting desperate. Especially when you keep insisting that if it was repealed suddenly it would be full of gay man. How exactly does the current system not violate their privacy?

Sounds like someone is very unfamiliar with the military and was talking out of their anus. The military probably has a lot of faggots and as long as they're not openly serving and letting everyone know.



What proof do you have that most troops would hate it as much as you do?

What proof do have that its not going to cause any problems and that troops wouldn't care? The Bass was in the military and you have not served so don't you think the bass is speaking from experience?



Except they'd have more troops and translators.

The military can get more troops and translators all they like, they're not exactly starving for them. Anyone that violates the regulation is subject to separation anyways and more people get put out for reasons other than being gay, so whats the point?



Straw man. You know that's not what it would make it.

Thats what they are making it and have already done so, but when you head is stuck in the sand its not hard to realize why you can't see it.



No, we can always try to change the warrantless rules.

To join the military is a choice and the military is not subject to change anything to accommodate anyone, most people who serve realize this, lazy, fat civilians don't know. The military is not a democracy.



Non-Sequiter. Stop trying to deflect.

Stop trolling and accept the facts, the military is not a democracy, all people who join must adapt and conform to it, those who can't must be separated for failure to adapt.



So we should just blindly follow the rules that are there? There's a name for thickies like you.

When you sign up thats what you're supposed to do, again, the military is not subject to change its rules for the benefit of others, it changes only for the benefit of itself.




Based on the fact that most soldiers are not as obsessed over homosexuals as you are and that they're not as weak as you'd take them for.

Most troops are not as tolerant of homosexuals as you stupid liberals think, but hey, you liberals have a history of shoving your progressive BS onto others, BS that not even you believe would work, just as long as you all don't have to deal with it.
 
Third person references to one's self are gay.... just sayin ... It's queer.

More personal attacks, the Bass rests his case, until you faggots and faggot lovers come up with a convicing argument other than liberal BS propaganda and gay activism the Bass will not waste his time chastise grown adults incapable of putting up a valid argument.

When you consider that all other NATO countries allow openly gay people to serve, then couple that with the fact that we currently have a war with Saudi speaking people, and some of the gays they want to kick out are Arabic language experts, of which we have only 500 in the military.

Compound that to the fact there are 2 wars on, and it takes a lot of manpower, which means allowing gays to serve openly, so that we don't need to institute another draft.

Oh yeah.........never mind the fact that it would make our military just that much stronger, because racist douchebag homophobic people such as yourself would get out, taking along their old standards and ancient mores with them.

Yep.........getting rid of racists and homophobic people is a good start in my opinion.

The US military is unique and way more disciplined than all the other NATO countries and whats works best for them may not work best for the US military because different countries equal different cultures. Some NATO countries allow their troops to have strippers and drink alcohol while deployed, should the US military follow suit just because they do it? Real leaders and people who set bar lead from the front, not follow. Allowing faggots to serve openly is not going to make the world's greatest military any stronger, faggots are not the glue that holds the military together, they are not the heart and soul of the military.
 
Actually Ass Chucker, ALL NATO countries (ours included) allow our sailors, Marines and soldiers to "have strippers and drink beer".

Ever actually BEEN in a military town? Lots of strip clubs dude. Lots of bars as well.

I really wonder if you ever did serve?
 
Actually Ass Chucker, ALL NATO countries (ours included) allow our sailors, Marines and soldiers to "have strippers and drink beer".

Ever actually BEEN in a military town? Lots of strip clubs dude. Lots of bars as well.

I really wonder if you ever did serve?

No, the other NATO countries allow their troops to drink alcohol have strippers while deployed, not that ship cruise crap you faggoty squids have. A fellow officer of mine who was in Bosnia 1996-1997 observed German and Danish soldiers having strippers and alcohol and being allowed to visit prostitutes while deployed, US troops are not allowed to do such undisciplined acts and the US military leads from the front, we don't follow others you stupid Bikerfaggot.
 

Forum List

Back
Top