Funding of the Transcontinental Railroad

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Oct 6, 2008
124,904
60,285
2,300
Brooklyn, NY
The topic is the building of the transcontinental railroad.
I'm certain that many would believe this belongs in History...but my interest was in the relationship between private industry and government, in the financing of the transcontinental.

I had the opportunity to visit the Railroad Museum in Old Sacramento, California, last week...and heard an amazing lecture on the above. I'll give the book I picked up at the end.




1. Early on, most railroads were built by the private sector, government support took the form of various mechanisms, such as allowing companies to run lotteries, granting of monopolies, tax exemptions, and land grants.

a. This was a feeling-out period of a difficult relationship between government and the railroads.





2. The need and feasibility of a transcontinental railroad had been discussed as early as 1820, but not until the 1850's was it seriously considered.

3. On the one hand, it was delayed by the Civil War....but it was the absence of Southern politicians that allowed the necessary legislation to be passed by Congress.

a. The South was opposed because it meant more free-states to be formed.





4. It was the largest railroad project in the world, until the Trans-Siberian 30 years later. The transcontinental had the backing of Abraham Lincoln, and required huge subsidies in the form of both cash, and land grants to the two companies doing the building: the Union Pacific and the Central Pacific.

5. The Pacific Railroad Act of 1862, signed by Lincoln on July 1, 1862, gave the concession for building the transcontinental railroad to two companies: the Central Pacific was to start in Sacramento, Ca., and the Union Pacific, to begin at Council Bluffs, Iowa. These two became the biggest corporations in the country.

6. The deal offered the companies was good to start with...but even improved two years later!

a. For every mile that they completed in the plains, they received $16,000 in government bonds.
b. ...$32,000 in the hills...
c. ...and $48,000 in the mountains.
"The Great Railroad Revolution," by Christian Wolmar

7. This alone represented a potential loan of $60 million to the companies.

a. Further, there was a land grant representing more than 31,000 square miles, the size of South Carolina. The sale of said land allowed much of the railroad's financing.

b. This was distributed as 10 square miles per mile of track in strips alternating on either side of the right of way (which was, itself, 400 feet wide).

c. . No government funding until each company had raised millions of dollars, and built 40 miles of track.




8. Railroads began as a business venture....private, not government: Britain played a major role in funding the railroads. From the start, financing had been sought in Europe, and especially in England. Those states that provided support did so via bonds sold largely abroad.


9. Theodore Judah, chief engineer on the Sacramento Valley Line was the visionary, the fanatic, who was equal parts engineer and lobbyist. He had the plan to build the transcontinental through the Sierra Nevada mountain range.

10 . And Theodore Judah was an honest man. Based on the fact that building in the mountains brought three time the amount that the government loaned the company ($48,000 vs. $16,000), the business men claimed that the Sierra Nevadas began some 20 miles before it did....Judah had surveyed the mountains and refused to agree. As this was a difference of $640,000 to the company....Judah was out.
Bain, "Empire Express: Building the First Transcontinental Railroad," p.17.

a. Lincoln understood the cheating...but wanted the transcontinental built at all costs.

b. As they got more per mile for mountains, the railroad men hired surveyors who claimed that the Sierra Nevadas began miles before they actually did.....Lincoln caught on, and said 'I've heard of men who move mountains....these men move whole mountain ranges.'
He wanted the railroad built.

And so it was.





Know where the two lines met?


Lincoln set the gauge, the distance between rails, as different lines heretofore had different widths....
...know the standard width he set?
 
Last edited:
yea, the land along the railroad was the biggest advantage. that was turned into a very sustainable profit through development.
 
yea, the land along the railroad was the biggest advantage. that was turned into a very sustainable profit through development.



"...a very sustainable profit..."


Oh, yeah.



1. In 1849 no railroad company operated more than 250 miles, but by 1855 at least 16 railroads controlled over 200 miles.

2. The large companies were becoming the nation's biggest businesses.
By 1861, at the outbreak of the Civil War, at least 10 railroad companies had at least $10 million in capital.
No other enterprise came close.
 
yea, the land along the railroad was the biggest advantage. that was turned into a very sustainable profit through development.



"...a very sustainable profit..."


Oh, yeah.



1. In 1849 no railroad company operated more than 250 miles, but by 1855 at least 16 railroads controlled over 200 miles.

2. The large companies were becoming the nation's biggest businesses.
By 1861, at the outbreak of the Civil War, at least 10 railroad companies had at least $10 million in capital.
No other enterprise came close.

you have the means of transport. you own the property ajacent ot the means of transport which means you own the distribution hubs. You own the property and most of the businesses on those properties that service those hubs. if people want their goods moved they pay you to move them and handle them. you need supplies and equipment to run your business you pay the railroads to move them and handle them. they were a near monopoly at the time. roads were poor and the highway network did not yet exist. even if they were available a mode to transport large quantities of goods did not yet exist. the only game in town not only set the rates but set the rules. add to that a government pushing expansion westward and you have a recipe for success
 
Lincoln set the gauge, the distance between rails, as different lines heretofore had different widths....
...know the standard width he set?


The answer is 4 feet, 8 and a half inches....

...and the reason for that is interesting:

1.From "Gordian Knot: Political Gridlock on the Information Highway," by W. Russell Neuman, Lee McKnight, and Richard Jay Solomon:
[A]s an accident of history most road carriages in the the Middle Ages inherited the old Roman cart gauge of approximately 4 feet, 8-1/2 inches. Julius Caesar set this width under Roman law so that vehicles could traverse Roman villages and towns without getting caught in stone ruts of differing widths. Over the centuries this became the traditional standard.



2. Here is a far simpler explanation:

The dimension common to both locomotives manufactured by English railroad pioneer George Stephenson, and about Roman war chariots was that of a cart axle pulled by two horses in harness (about 1.4m or 4ft 8in). This determined both the Roman gauge and Stephenson's, which derived from the horsedrawn wagon ways of south Northumberland and County Durham coalfields.
The Straight Dope: Was standard railroad gauge (4'8½") determined by Roman chariot ruts?
 
Last edited:
And of course the government funded railroads were notorious for corruption and constantly losing money, as opposed to James J. Hill's private Great Northern Railway which outcompeted them at every step of the way.
 
And of course the government funded railroads were notorious for corruption and constantly losing money, as opposed to James J. Hill's private Great Northern Railway which outcompeted them at every step of the way.

The graft and corruption was staggering.

Beside the fake surveys that claimed that they were going through mountains when they weren't, both companies- since they were being advanced loans per mile- built circuitous routes with no reason to meet directly nor quickly.


So....where did they finally meet?
 
You missed the story of the role the railroad played in starting the Civil War. By the end of 1850 it looked like another compromise had been reached, masterfully engineered by Senator Stephen A Douglas. Douglas was chairman of the Committee on Territories and with the deaths of Calhoun Webster and Clay in a short period had become the pre-eminent legislator and orator in the Senate.

For more than a decade Douglas had twin passions: to become president of the United States and to secure a transcontinental railroad. Now both seemed in reach. Having lost the contest for the hand of Mary Todd to a local rival, he had married in 1847 Martha Martin. A year later Martha's father died, leaving them a 2500 acre plantation and 100 slaves on the banks of the Pearl River in Lawrence County Mississippi, not far from where the Warren Hood Scout Reservation is now located. Thus Douglas had covered his southern flank, he was by proxy a member of the planter class. In fact he set aside 20% of the income of the plantation to finance his political efforts!

The North in general and the Republican Party in particular had an economic program with three legs: a homestead bill, a protective tariff, and a Pacific Railroad. Since the Civil War the politics of the1850's have been viewed as a monomaniacal concentration on the slavery issue to the exclusion of all other issues. This is a false view, for other issues also divided North and South. The economic program of the North was opposed by the South, who saw a homestead bill as benefitting small farmers (with a 160 acre limit) but not workable plantations; the tariff as a tax on southern imports (the South had a miniscule industrial base compared to the North), and no interest in helping pay for a railroad that would link the North to the Pacific. But a southern route might be another matter.

Engineering studies in the 1840's had identified three feasible routes, with the eastern terminus at Vicksburg for the southern route (incidentally within 50 miles of Douglas' plantation!), Chicago for the central route, and St Paul for the northern route. Of course the railroad would be a bonanza for land owners near the railroad, and especially the terminus; a great land bubble began. While Douglas was just a civic-minded legislator promoting the interests of his voter and of the country as a whole, there was no law that required him to abstain from extending his land holdings outside of Mississippi. Douglas invested heavily in real estate in Chicago and in Superior City, Michigan where a far north route might end.

Now one problem with these routes was that the central and northern routes would pass through unorganized Indian territory. To make room for the railroad, the Indians would have to be moved and replaced with settlers. Those settlers needed to be organized into a territory, and that was Douglas' job as Chairman of the Committee on Territories. Toward the end of the short session in March 1853, with two days remaining, the territorial issue and railroad issue were intertwined. Eastern interests were opposed to any railroad, so in quick succession a southern route was voted down by Easterners and Westerners and a central route was voted down by Easterners and Southerners. Senator David Atchison of Missouri spoke in support of a railroad bill, but added that he could not support creation of a territory west of Missouri in which slaveholders would be excluded. So the future of the railroad was now hostage to Douglas' ability to secure enough votes to form the new territory.

In 1854 the result was the Kansas-Nebraska Act. Soon after the fighting began in Kansas. But the railroad was built. Douglas died before it was completed, shortly after his failed campaign for president. His children inherited the Mississippi plantation and the Chicago real estate.
 
yea, the land along the railroad was the biggest advantage. that was turned into a very sustainable profit through development.



"...a very sustainable profit..."


Oh, yeah.



1. In 1849 no railroad company operated more than 250 miles, but by 1855 at least 16 railroads controlled over 200 miles.

2. The large companies were becoming the nation's biggest businesses.
By 1861, at the outbreak of the Civil War, at least 10 railroad companies had at least $10 million in capital.
No other enterprise came close.

you have the means of transport. you own the property ajacent ot the means of transport which means you own the distribution hubs. You own the property and most of the businesses on those properties that service those hubs. if people want their goods moved they pay you to move them and handle them. you need supplies and equipment to run your business you pay the railroads to move them and handle them. they were a near monopoly at the time. roads were poor and the highway network did not yet exist. even if they were available a mode to transport large quantities of goods did not yet exist. the only game in town not only set the rates but set the rules. add to that a government pushing expansion westward and you have a recipe for success




http://www.usmessageboard.com/economy/306874-progressive-government-kills-capitalism.html
 

Forum List

Back
Top