Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
the only way to create jobs in the U.S. is to get the poor to pay for it. Such as through tax breaks.
and your point is???????But I doubt if it would pay off the national debt. Also, why should it. Health care didn't cause our national debt.
our health care is socialist so it costs 5 times more than it should. The saving could pay off the national debt in 6 years. It's truly a win win!!
Do we have universal, single payer health care? No. So you can't call our health care "socialist." Also, I will SHOW you what cost what. In terms of the true measure of wealth. Which is the GDP. You can compare the percentage of the national GDP that countries with universal health care pat compared to what our country pays.
the last you heard?? Did you hear from the authors of the 3 books I gave you???No. China is still a communist country. .
Here are 3 books with which to begin your education:
"Capitalism With Chinese Characteristics"
"How China Became Capitalist"
In his new book titled Markets over Mao: The rise of private businesses in China, Lardy argues that even though SOEs still enjoy monopoly positions in some key sectors in China, such as energy and telecommunications, their role in the overall economy has diminished significantly over the years. Here are some of the facts he presents to back his thesis: in 2011, China’s state-controlled firms only accounted for about a quarter of the country’s industrial output; and their share in exports has dropped to about 11% today; in 2012, state firms were only responsible for about one-tenth of fixed investment in manufacturing. And in terms of employment, SOEs employed about 13% of China’s labor force in 2011, a dramatic decline compared with the 60% figure recorded in 1999.
The last I heard, China was still a communist country. Regardless of how they decided to tweak their economy.
No. China is still a communist country. .
Here are 3 books with which to begin your education:
"Capitalism With Chinese Characteristics"
"How China Became Capitalist"
In his new book titled Markets over Mao: The rise of private businesses in China, Lardy argues that even though SOEs still enjoy monopoly positions in some key sectors in China, such as energy and telecommunications, their role in the overall economy has diminished significantly over the years. Here are some of the facts he presents to back his thesis: in 2011, China’s state-controlled firms only accounted for about a quarter of the country’s industrial output; and their share in exports has dropped to about 11% today; in 2012, state firms were only responsible for about one-tenth of fixed investment in manufacturing. And in terms of employment, SOEs employed about 13% of China’s labor force in 2011, a dramatic decline compared with the 60% figure recorded in 1999.
The last I heard, China was still a communist country. Regardless of how they decided to tweak their economy.
the only way to create jobs in the U.S. is to get the poor to pay for it. Such as through tax breaks.
1) new jobs come new inventions
2) what govt can do is cut taxes and regulation if it wants to help
3) top 1% pay 42% of all income tax so there is plenty of room to cut taxes.
Do you understand now??
The wealthy most likely pay FAR LESS in taxes than the poor. Why? Because they can afford expensive lawyers and accountants to hide their money.
the last you heard?? Did you hear from the authors of the 3 books I gave you???No. China is still a communist country. .
Here are 3 books with which to begin your education:
"Capitalism With Chinese Characteristics"
"How China Became Capitalist"
In his new book titled Markets over Mao: The rise of private businesses in China, Lardy argues that even though SOEs still enjoy monopoly positions in some key sectors in China, such as energy and telecommunications, their role in the overall economy has diminished significantly over the years. Here are some of the facts he presents to back his thesis: in 2011, China’s state-controlled firms only accounted for about a quarter of the country’s industrial output; and their share in exports has dropped to about 11% today; in 2012, state firms were only responsible for about one-tenth of fixed investment in manufacturing. And in terms of employment, SOEs employed about 13% of China’s labor force in 2011, a dramatic decline compared with the 60% figure recorded in 1999.
The last I heard, China was still a communist country. Regardless of how they decided to tweak their economy.
. There was a big deal made when communism collapsed in Russia.
I haven't heard a peep about that happening in China.
For example, did you ever hear about Tiananmen square?.
Also, at one time the communist government mandated a one child per couple policy. They recently "mandated" that couples could have two children if they choose to.
No. China is still a communist country. .
Here are 3 books with which to begin your education:
"Capitalism With Chinese Characteristics"
"How China Became Capitalist"
In his new book titled Markets over Mao: The rise of private businesses in China, Lardy argues that even though SOEs still enjoy monopoly positions in some key sectors in China, such as energy and telecommunications, their role in the overall economy has diminished significantly over the years. Here are some of the facts he presents to back his thesis: in 2011, China’s state-controlled firms only accounted for about a quarter of the country’s industrial output; and their share in exports has dropped to about 11% today; in 2012, state firms were only responsible for about one-tenth of fixed investment in manufacturing. And in terms of employment, SOEs employed about 13% of China’s labor force in 2011, a dramatic decline compared with the 60% figure recorded in 1999.
The last I heard, China was still a communist country. Regardless of how they decided to tweak their economy.
tweak???? switching from socialism wherein 60 million starved to death to Republican capitalism wherein 60 million are getting rich is far more than tweaking. Do you understand?
There was a famine in China under Mao. .
Compared to shitting in a rice patty, it doesn't take much to become "rich."
Also, we don't import their cheap products because their workers are rolling in dough.
Lol, this thread is so laughable! Free market healthcare is what we had before the ACA! lol
He apparently has no idea that Medicare Medicaid schip VA tricare community clinics etc. are not private organizationsor that liberals made free enterprise illegal in healthcare in 1945 with the McCarren FergusonLol, this thread is so laughable! Free market healthcare is what we had before the ACA! lol
When have we had a free market in health care? Certainly not for the last hundred years or so.
as if govt regs are helpful?? 120 million slowly starved to death in USSR and Red China.Hell, free market healthcare without government regs is even worse.
The cold hard truth is the government already regulates the healthcare system anyways for a high standard and to prevent the abuses
