Fox News says Tucker Carlson breached his contract

[DudleySmith]

So, nothing. Just you citing yourself as labor law.

I accept your concession with all the grace and patience it deserves.

lol good luck with that. Most people have already looked it up, and can even cite the cases, while you just babble idiot crap you got from some hack site.

 

[Skylar]

The only reason they're still paying him is merely a weak attempt at keeping him from other employment. Almost no court is going to rule he can't seek employment elsewhere, as it is their own refusal to allow him access to practice his profession, no this own actions.

All meaningless psuedo-legal gibberish.

The courts have long upheld non-compete agreements. And you don't even know what they are.

No court is bound to your imagination. While tucker is bound to his contract with Fox News. And they to him. They're meeting their obligations by paying him.

 

[Skylar]

A cheap gimmick that won't stand up in court, too bad for you; you don't know anything.

Says you, citing you. And you're clueless, citing yourself as labor law.

Back in reality, Carlson's contract with Fox binds them both. And Fox is meeting their obligation by paying Carlson.

 

[Skylar]

lol good luck with that. Most people have already looked it up, and can even cite the cases, while you just babble idiot crap you got from some hack site.

Laughing......you've only cited yourself, buddy. Your imagination isn't the law, no matter how hard you lean into the Dunning Kruger effect.

Meanwhile, non-competes have long since been upheld by the court. And you don't even know what a non-compete agreement is.

And Fox is STILL paying Carlson, who is under contract until at least 2025.

Remember.....you don't actually know what you're talking about.

 

[DudleySmith]

Laughing......you've only cited yourself, buddy. Your imagination isn't the law, no matter how hard you lean into the Dunning Kruger effect.

Meanwhile, non-competes have long since been upheld by the court. And you don't even know what a non-compete agreement is.

And Fox is STILL paying Carlson, who is under contract until at least 2025.

Remember.....you don't actually know what you're talking about.

Remember, you're triggered moron who is just parroting some tripe he read and doesn't understand what he read to boot. Citing actual cases is way above your reading level, of course, so no point in it. Those who are informed already know how it will play out.

 

[Skylar]

Remember, you're triggered moron who is just parroting some tripe he read and doesn't understand what he read to boot.

Silly rabbit....you're still quoting yourself as labor laws. And still don't know what a non-compete is.

How's that working out for you?

 

[DudleySmith]

All meaningless psuedo-legal gibberish.

The courts have long upheld non-compete agreements. And you don't even know what they are.

No court is bound to your imagination. While tucker is bound to his contract with Fox News. And they to him. They're meeting their obligations by paying him.

You have a copy of Tucker's contract? lol of course not, and you couldn't read it if you did. You're just talking out of your ass, as usual.

 

[Skylar]

You have a copy of Tucker's contract? lol of course not, and you couldn't read it if you did. You're just talking out of your ass, as usual.

Says the guy that's literally citing himself as labor laws.

Back in reality, non-compete agreements are quite legal, quite enforceable.

"Non-compete agreements are contracts between an employer and an employee that are typically signed at the start of their business relationship. Essentially, a non-compete agreement prohibits the employee from competing with the business directly or indirectly for a specific duration of time after their employment has ended."

The basics of non-compete agreements

Non-compete agreements: what are they? What do they mean for employers and for employees? And, are they enforceable?

legal.thomsonreuters.com

But you know better, huh?

Laughing....good luck with that.

 

[DudleySmith]

Says the guy that's literally citing himself as labor laws.

Back in reality, non-compete agreements are quite legal, quite enforceable.

"Non-compete agreements are contracts between an employer and an employee that are typically signed at the start of their business relationship. Essentially, a non-compete agreement prohibits the employee from competing with the business directly or indirectly for a specific duration of time after their employment has ended."

The basics of non-compete agreements

Non-compete agreements: what are they? What do they mean for employers and for employees? And, are they enforceable?

legal.thomsonreuters.com

But you know better, huh?

Laughing....good luck with that.

Yes, I do know better, and you seem to believe if you repeat idiot nonsense many many times it will become true. lol you don't even understand your own cites.

 

[OKTexas]

The only reason they're still paying him is merely a weak attempt at keeping him from other employment. Almost no court is going to rule he can't seek employment elsewhere, as it is their own refusal to allow him access to practice his profession, no this own actions.

Sure he can seek employment elsewhere, just not in video media. He was in print media before Fox, I see no reason he can do that.

.

 

[Skylar]

Yes, I do know better, and you seem to believe if you repeat idiot nonsense many many times it will become true. lol you don't even understand your own cites.

No, buddy....you don't. You don't even know what non-compete agreements are. And you have no idea what labor laws say.

You're literally citing yourself AS labor laws. And you're nobody.

Back in reality, non-compete agreements exist, they're enforceable, and the courts have long upheld them.

"Non-compete agreements are contracts between an employer and an employee that are typically signed at the start of their business relationship. Essentially, a non-compete agreement prohibits the employee from competing with the business directly or indirectly for a specific duration of time after their employment has ended."

The basics of non-compete agreements

Non-compete agreements: what are they? What do they mean for employers and for employees? And, are they enforceable?

legal.thomsonreuters.com

You simply have no idea what you're talking about.

 

[DudleySmith]

Sure he can seek employment elsewhere, just not in video media. He was in print media before Fox, I see no reason he can do that.

.

Actually he was a regular on PBS shows before Fox, McLaughlin Group for one, as well as a print journalist. In any case, Fox will lose the suit; all the legal precedents say so. As I said, they keep paying him in order to confuse the issue, but as a media personality they have essentially terminated him and voided their contracts. He didn't quit. He is free to pursue employment as he wishes. The 'branding' he had was developed before he went to Fox, its all his, not theirs.

 

[Skylar]

Actually he was a regular on PBS shows before Fox, McLaughlin Group for one, as well as a print journalist. In any case, Fox will lose the suit; all the legal precedents say so.

More meaningless pseudo-legal gibberish.

You're not citing legal precedent. You're citing yourself. And you have no idea what you're talking about. You don't even know what a non-compete agreement is.

Your imagination isn't precedent. Your imagination isn't labor laws. You're nobody.

Back in reality.......non-compete agreements exist, they're enforceable, and the courts have long since upheld them.

'A non-competition agreement (“non-compete”) prohibits an employee from working for a competitor or opening a competing business, typically for a certain period of time after an employee leaves a job. A non-compete may be one section of an employment contract or a standalone contract that an employee signs before or after employment begins."

Https://ag.ny.gov/sites/default/files/non-competes.pdf

Says who? Says the Attorney General of the State of New York.

 

[OKTexas]

Actually he was a regular on PBS shows before Fox, McLaughlin Group for one, as well as a print journalist. In any case, Fox will lose the suit; all the legal precedents say so. As I said, they keep paying him in order to confuse the issue, but as a media personality they have essentially terminated him and voided their contracts. He didn't quit. He is free to pursue employment as he wishes. The 'branding' he had was developed before he went to Fox, its all his, not theirs.

How about you provide a link to these precedents. Just in case you don't know, that would be to the actual court decisions.

.

 

[Skylar]

How about you provide a link to these precedents. Just in case you don't know, that would be to the actual court decisions.

.

He doesn't know.

Dud is literally just making up his pseudo-legal nonsense as he goes along.

Contract law typically falls under state jurisdiction. And Fox is based in NYC. The Attorney General of NY confirms that non-competes exist, and they're enforceable.

 

[OKTexas]

He doesn't know.

Dud is literally just making up his pseudo-legal nonsense as he goes along.

Contract law typically falls under state jurisdiction. And Fox is based in NYC. The Attorney General of NY confirms that non-competes exist, and they're enforceable.

That's why the xiden EO in that one link is laughable.

.

 

[Skylar]

That's why the xiden EO in that one link is laughable.

.

And irrelevant to what we're discussing.

 

[DudleySmith]

How about you provide a link to these precedents. Just in case you don't know, that would be to the actual court decisions.

.

How about you educate yourself with basic knowledge before posting in threads, so you don't have to rely on others to educate you.

 

[DudleySmith]

Contract law typically falls under state jurisdiction. And Fox is based in NYC. The Attorney General of NY confirms that non-competes exist, and they're enforceable.

Actually he merely claims some cases are enforceable; since you don't know squat you have no idea what the distinctions are.

 

[Skylar]

How about you educate yourself with basic knowledge before posting in threads, so you don't have to rely on others to educate you.

So, no OKTexas. Dud has jackshit for precedent. Dud's only source.....is Dudley.

Meanwhile, the NY Attorney General is clear as a bell as to what non-compete agreements are.

A non-competition agreement (“non-compete”) prohibits an employee from working for a competitor or opening a competing business, typically for a certain period of time after an employee leaves a job. A non-compete may be one section of an employment contract or a standalone contract that an employee signs before or after employment begins."

https://ag.ny.gov/sites/default/files/non-competes.pdf