Fox Lies Again, Claims Obama Is Trying To Strip Voting Rights To The Troops

Stop being stupid. Show me why a person in the military cannot commit the kind of fraud you're describing,

then show me how the law allows one set of voting rules for some Ohioans and one set for another.

Show me where the Constitution allows a state to arbitrarily give one group more days to vote than another,

without cause.

Someone stationed in Afghanistan can come in and vote early and also vote absentee? :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

You are a certified idiot!

And also you show your contempt for our military, contending they would fight and die for our rights but then try to thwart them by vote stealing.

That is what Democrats do. Not our military.

You are talking about Progressives....The same people that called soldiers baby killers.

Their contempt for the military just oozes out of this law suit.

Then they have the gall to claim it's about "equality."

What an insult to the truth!
 
More liberal websites!

:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

You have not used one source in any of your arguments in this thread that isn't a right wing hack source, yet several times you make fun of the liberal sources.

You make fun of media matters or talking points memo or politico or Juan Willimas or Real Clear Politics polls, etc.

BUT you will use Rasmussen polling, Washington Examiner, Michelle Malkin, Lou Dobbs, etc. and see those as legitimate sources.

If can't see a problem with this, then there really is no point in discussing this with you.

Oh well, your loss.

Keep laughing.
 
Someone stationed in Afghanistan can come in and vote early and also vote absentee? :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

You are a certified idiot!

And also you show your contempt for our military, contending they would fight and die for our rights but then try to thwart them by vote stealing.

That is what Democrats do. Not our military.

You are talking about Progressives....The same people that called soldiers baby killers.

Their contempt for the military just oozes out of this law suit.

Then they have the gall to claim it's about "equality."

What an insult to the truth!

Perhaps they think since they're in the military? They're not really citizens, or should be treated as 2nd/3rd class...:eusa_whistle:
 
More liberal websites!

:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

You have not used one source in any of your arguments in this thread that isn't a right wing hack source, yet several times you make fun of the liberal sources.

You make fun of media matters or talking points memo or politico or Juan Willimas or Real Clear Politics polls, etc.

BUT you will use Rasmussen polling, Washington Examiner, Michelle Malkin, Lou Dobbs, etc. and see those as legitimate sources.

If can't see a problem with this, then there really is no point in discussing this with you.

Oh well, your loss.

Keep laughing.
So we can be clear on this.....If it is the truth is is a republican hack news source?
 
More liberal websites!

:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

You have not used one source in any of your arguments in this thread that isn't a right wing hack source, yet several times you make fun of the liberal sources.

You make fun of media matters or talking points memo or politico or Juan Willimas or Real Clear Politics polls, etc.

BUT you will use Rasmussen polling, Washington Examiner, Michelle Malkin, Lou Dobbs, etc. and see those as legitimate sources.

If can't see a problem with this, then there really is no point in discussing this with you.

Oh well, your loss.

Keep laughing.
So we can be clear on this.....If it is the truth is is a republican hack news source?

Why are the right wing sites truthful and the left wing ones lying?
 
More liberal websites!

:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

You have not used one source in any of your arguments in this thread that isn't a right wing hack source, yet several times you make fun of the liberal sources.

You make fun of media matters or talking points memo or politico or Juan Willimas or Real Clear Politics polls, etc.

BUT you will use Rasmussen polling, Washington Examiner, Michelle Malkin, Lou Dobbs, etc. and see those as legitimate sources.

If can't see a problem with this, then there really is no point in discussing this with you.

Oh well, your loss.

Keep laughing.
So we can be clear on this.....If it is the truth is is a republican hack news source?

Radical right wing propaganda outlets never tell the truth. If they did, they would completely cease to exist.
 
You have not used one source in any of your arguments in this thread that isn't a right wing hack source, yet several times you make fun of the liberal sources.

You make fun of media matters or talking points memo or politico or Juan Willimas or Real Clear Politics polls, etc.

BUT you will use Rasmussen polling, Washington Examiner, Michelle Malkin, Lou Dobbs, etc. and see those as legitimate sources.

If can't see a problem with this, then there really is no point in discussing this with you.

Oh well, your loss.

Keep laughing.
So we can be clear on this.....If it is the truth is is a republican hack news source?

Radical right wing propaganda outlets never tell the truth. If they did, they would completely cease to exist.

I have noticed that the right lies way more than the left. I can only guess it is because they want to keep people uninformed.

Sad, that people don't all use factual information to get their news instead of being consumed by hatred for those they disagree with.
 
So we can be clear on this.....If it is the truth is is a republican hack news source?

Radical right wing propaganda outlets never tell the truth. If they did, they would completely cease to exist.

I have noticed that the right lies way more than the left. I can only guess it is because they want to keep people uninformed.

Sad, that people don't all use factual information to get their news instead of being consumed by hatred for those they disagree with.

Very true, the right wing propaganda machine spreads nothing but lies and hate, which their obedient sheep lap up and parrot without question.

The right wing machine appeals to the most ignorant and easily misled amount us to spread their stupidity.
 
I don't think any of these lawsuits would of occurred if the GOP didn't spend so much time passing laws that suppressed voters rights to vote.

I have a real problem with that and every American should also have a problem with it too.

NO ONE is suppressing any rights to vote. And if you mean laws that require picture ID? YOU are wrong it suppresses nothing.

What Obama is doing to the military is WRONG and a REAL threat to voting rights of people that protect the sorry asses of the left that loathe the military anyway. Obama and Holder are showing just how much they do too.:eusa_hand:

YOU are dismissed. :eusa_hand:

He's not doing anything to the military. They can still vote early.

I do not see anything wrong with it either. Even if Obama wins the lawsuit the voting rights of the military do not change.
 
You have not used one source in any of your arguments in this thread that isn't a right wing hack source, yet several times you make fun of the liberal sources.

You make fun of media matters or talking points memo or politico or Juan Willimas or Real Clear Politics polls, etc.

BUT you will use Rasmussen polling, Washington Examiner, Michelle Malkin, Lou Dobbs, etc. and see those as legitimate sources.

If can't see a problem with this, then there really is no point in discussing this with you.

Oh well, your loss.

Keep laughing.
So we can be clear on this.....If it is the truth is is a republican hack news source?

Why are the right wing sites truthful and the left wing ones lying?

Because Progressives lie .....
 
cartoon-foxnews-jan13.gif.gif

Great pictures did you copy them from and NBC or MSNBC story. Grow up this is not one sided. Both parties are lying throught their teeth. Any thing is fair in an election year.
 
It's proven beyond all doubt that Obama did NOT try to take voting rights from the troops.

The phase this thread is in now is the classic phase where the rightwingers think they can win the argument just by not admitting they lost.
 
Fox flat out lie the truth? :eusa_eh:

That doesn't even make sense! :eusa_eh:

I KNOW you are desperate to save face after losing so badly, but try to string together comprehensible sentences in your desperation.

Come on now, it's OK to admit that your propaganda masters were lying. Of course unless you are nothing but a radical right wing hack that doesn't care that Fox is flat out lying,..

I'm lying?

Why won't you answer the question? If this is about equality, WHY ONLY SUE ONE STATE, AND NOT ALL 32 STATES THAT HAVE THE SAME LAW?????????

Why, when this law has been on the books a year does Obama wait until less than 100 days before an election to file this suit??????

And how can you idiots laughingly say there is EQUALITY, between someone stationed in Afghanistan and someone living in the state as far as opportunites to vote!

You won't address those questions because they expose the LIE of the Obama law suit.

Obama didn't sue anyone. He's not a plaintiff in the Ohio lawsuit.
 
Yeah, because Media Matters is soooooooooooooooooooo truthful!

And then he wonders why we are laughing at him!

:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

Posting a video of a fox broadcast is not factual? Was it a fake broadcast? Don't like that you were put in your place again after all that trolling and now you're all butthurt?

All you are saying is Fox News didn't broadcast it according to YOUR OPINION OF THE LAW SUIT!

And it all boils down to this.

Does someone living in the state have the same opportunity to vote as someone stationed in Afghanistan.

Hell does someone LIVING IN THE COUNTRY have the same opportunity to vote as someone stationed in Afghanistan???????

This makes it clear what a JOKE is this law suit!

There is NOTHING equal about being in the military stationed on all over the world, as compared to someone living in the country, or in the state.

You libs keep avoiding this, because you know it puts the lie to your "equality" claim.

Listen carefully. The law applies to in-person voting. A soldier being in Afghanistan is not in any way affected by this.

They took away 3 days of early IN-PERSON voting IN OHIO, AT OHIO POLLING PLACES, from everyone except military personnel.

The lawsuit wants the 3 days back for EVERYONE. There is nothing in the lawsuit whatsoever that attempts to reduce military voting.

You really need to show a little class and common sense and concede that you were wrong here...

...you know, no one is going to think less of you for accepting the indisputable truth. You should consider that while you're thinking this over.
 

Forum List

Back
Top