Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
She should keep going, he could be jailed or get sick lol...Put a fork in her.
If the Koch Bros. have abandoned thee, your curry's cooked.
JUST IN: Koch network stops spending on Nikki Haley’s campaign for president
The Koch network has decided to cease its financial support for her campaign.thepostmillennial.com
For the record, I would name another ethnic dish of any white guy or gal in the same predicament.
Sheesh.
Looked like the liberal three on the court view the issue in similar fashion as your paid for corporate six.......duh.They will simply do as they are told and damn the Constitution.
Every single justice on the court is corrupt. They all had the chance to adopt a code of ethics and it was universally voted down.Looked like the liberal three on the court view the issue in similar fashion as your paid for corporate six.......duh.
tRump is not a legitimate candidate. He is Constitutionally disqualified.
He is not an officer as defined under the 14th Sec 3.No, because the Constitution says so.
Put a fork in her.
If the Koch Bros. have abandoned thee, your curry's cooked.
JUST IN: Koch network stops spending on Nikki Haley’s campaign for president
The Koch network has decided to cease its financial support for her campaign.
For the record, I would name another ethnic dish of any white guy or gal in the same predicament.
Sheesh.
YOu have got to be shitting me.He is not an officer as defined under the 14th Sec 3.
Well Pal, tell ya what I learned in watching segments of the Colorado ballot hearing at SCOTUS. The exact claim came up from Colorado and it was either Justice Kagan or Jackson that told the atty that the president isn't an officer of the United States under the 14th, sec three.YOu have got to be shitting me.
That's the best you can do?
Demoting the commander in chief to "not an officer"?
All to save your orange idol from the consequences of his own actions?
You've just lost your right to claim to be an American.
Get your sorry-ass self outta my country.
www.usa.gov
"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God."
"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."
Then they are just as retarded as you.Well Pal, tell ya what I learned in watching segments of the Colorado ballot hearing at SCOTUS. The exact claim came up from Colorado and it was either Justice Kagan or Jackson that told the atty that the president isn't an officer of the United States under the 14th, sec three.
She said the oath for officers is different than the president......and that doesn't apply to the president as he has his own oath....therefore the section doesn't apply to the president.
Congress oath of office:
I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.
Presidents oath of office:
"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."
Inauguration of the president of the United States | USAGov
Learn about Inauguration Day in the U.S., when the president-elect and vice-president-elect are sworn in and take office.
So they are correct, it doesn't apply to the president.
Any questions?
What is the presidential oath of office?
The vice-president-elect is sworn in first, and repeats the same oath of office, in use since 1884, as senators, representatives, and other federal employees:
Around noon, the president-elect recites the following oath, in accordance with Article II, Section I of the U.S. Constitution:
Looking quite like you are full of shit via a couple liberal Justices questions.Then they are just as retarded as you.
Dude, I have said for months they are all corrupt. This is a rare case of "both sides". It's time to flush the court completely and start fresh.Looking quite like you are full of shit via a couple liberal Justices questions.
Please show us where I am wrong.
Yeah, and Dems could tell the truth.She should keep going, he could be jailed or get sick lol...
Only your fellow dupes in the world believe you're not ignorant nut jobs....Yeah, and Dems could tell the truth.
You are in the minority opinion, very minor.Only your fellow dupes in the world believe you're not ignorant nut jobs....
They have contributed to Rinos and Democrats.Even though the Kochs were considered to be "evil incarnate" by the great unwashed leftist mob back in the day, they're pretty much RINOs and Trump-haters by today's standards.
They have contributed to Rinos and Democrats.
Just because you disagree with their possible interpretation? That's their main function, interpreting the law.Dude, I have said for months they are all corrupt. This is a rare case of "both sides". It's time to flush the court completely and start fresh.
And they should stick to that instead of legislating.That's their main function, interpreting the law.
Well that's what they were doing in questioning oral arguments in Colorado vs Trump.And they should stick to that instead of legislating.
Well no, not really. They were justifying.Well that's what they were doing in questioning oral arguments in Colorado vs Trump.
Informing the Co atty on how the 14th is actually interpreted is justifying?Well no, not really. They were justifying.
