For those who insist abortion should be a right

[mamooth]

Don't be such a punk. Where in this thread does it imply the Declaration of Independence applies to chickens? You made it up, and now you're lying about it.

Why did you highlight LIFE as the most important thing?

 

[progressive hunter]

Where did that idea come from Progressive Hunter?

The Declaration of independence has no authority in law.

it is and always will be our founding document,,

 

[boevans]

it is and always will be our founding document,,

So what? It has no authority in American law.

 

[progressive hunter]

So what? It has no authority in American law.

depends on what you mean by that,,

 

[Couchpotato]

Common enough that people knew it existed. And they had no problems with it.

I'm aware that Euthanasia exists. Would you say it's common? I'm aware that nuclear explosions exist. Are they common? Being aware of something's existence isn't proof of it's commonality. Albino deer exist. I've even seen one, and yet they are exceedingly rare.

So you're okay with a ban at 20 weeks?

Sure

What you wrote does show that the founders certainly did not think that a new person was formed at conception.

And?

 

[IDIOCRACY]

Why did you highlight LIFE as the most important thing?

Could it be because abortion ends a life? Try using your head.

 

[boevans]

depends on what you mean by that,,

I am writing slowly for you. It means no authority in the law.

 

[mamooth]

Could it be because abortion ends a life? Try using your head.

Yeah, like me eating a chicken sandwich.

Thanks for confirming my point.

 

[progressive hunter]

I am writing slowly for you. It means no authority in the law.

and who or when did someone try and convict someone based on what it says??

it is our founding document,,

 

[IDIOCRACY]

Yeah, like me eating a chicken sandwich.

Thanks for confirming my point.

You stupid *&%(%. You only confirmed you're an imbecile. I bolded mankind and life. You turned it into a chicken.

 

[boevans]

and who or when did someone try and convict someone based on what it says??

it is our founding document.

So what? It is a sentiment, nothing more.

 

[progressive hunter]

So what? It is a sentiment, nothing more.

you are more than welcome to consider it in any way you want,,

the fact remains its our founding document that sets the goals and understandings on why we left and what we intend for the future,,

 

[whitehall]

What is the argument about? Abortion is still legal and it is still a bad option for birth control. Even the horror show of late term abortion can't be outlawed in the liberal male dominated political world. The truth of the matter is that the faction of society that benefits most from abortion is liberal men who see their future responsibilities ended at the stroke of a scalpel. The liberal dominated media will probably never do a survey but it's likely that women are relieved that abortion on demand isn't as widely available as it used to be and they don't have to worry as much about being bullied into signing the papers.

 

[boevans]

Progressive Hunter admits the DoI s not law.

Yes, it does lists our principles as a people.

 

[progressive hunter]

Progressive Hunter admits the DoI s not law.

Yes, it does lists our principles as a people.

why are you so afraid to respond directly to me??

 

[boevans]

why are you so afraid to respond directly to me??

You? You're nothing. Your comments are being responded to in order to correct their mistakes.

 

[progressive hunter]

You? You're nothing. Your comments are being responded to in order to correct their mistakes.

what mistakes did I make that you could even correct??

the DoI is our founding document,,

 

[boevans]

what mistakes did I make that you could even correct??

the DoI is our founding document,,

No, it is a statement of principles, but it has no authority in law.

 

[progressive hunter]

No, it is a statement of principles, but it has no authority in law.

its the document used to separate us from our previous controller that also set standards for our future,,

how is that not our founding document??

I never said anything about authority of law,,

thats you trying to control and change the narrative,,

 

[boevans]

its the document used to separate us from our previous controller that also set standards for our future,,

how is that not our founding document??

I never said anything about authority of law,,

thats you trying to control and change the narrative,,

That's me making sense of your pontifications.