For The NRA Freedom Means Being Heavily Armed And Scared To Death

But what will our schools look like when we are done? What will our schools feel like? Is this where we are to train and nurture a free society, in the midst of assault rifles and bulletproof armor? Those things signify and communicate something quite other than freedom.

They impose an environment of fear, which can be debilitating to our youth, whom we should want to be confident, open, honest and happy. These are not the kinds of things you see in a free society, but a society at war. How bizarre is it that we would willfully take on the trappings of a society at war, while countless nations around the world — embroiled in real, live civil wars — envy our peace?

This is madness, of course. The NRA’s logic dictates that we should make our schools look like war zones to accommodate unfettered gun rights.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...eans-being-heavily-armed-and-scared-to-death/

We only have two choices in this matter: Live with mass killings or do something to try and stop them. Trying to go against our Constitution and disarm 300 million Americans will not be the solution because it can't be done.

Disarming the population isn’t possible nor is it desireable, but you can put much tighter restrictions on the sale of weapons which have no purpose other than aggression and murder, and on who can buy a gun. Same with large clips.

You can also require anyone buying a gun to having training, a background check, and err on the side of caution.
 
You know after seeing the video below I have to admit

you liberals are right about gun control...

We need to get rid of all of them now...

 
But what will our schools look like when we are done? What will our schools feel like? Is this where we are to train and nurture a free society, in the midst of assault rifles and bulletproof armor? Those things signify and communicate something quite other than freedom.

They impose an environment of fear, which can be debilitating to our youth, whom we should want to be confident, open, honest and happy. These are not the kinds of things you see in a free society, but a society at war. How bizarre is it that we would willfully take on the trappings of a society at war, while countless nations around the world — embroiled in real, live civil wars — envy our peace?

This is madness, of course. The NRA’s logic dictates that we should make our schools look like war zones to accommodate unfettered gun rights.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...eans-being-heavily-armed-and-scared-to-death/

We only have two choices in this matter: Live with mass killings or do something to try and stop them. Trying to go against our Constitution and disarm 300 million Americans will not be the solution because it can't be done.

Disarming the population isn’t possible nor is it desireable, but you can put much tighter restrictions on the sale of weapons which have no purpose other than aggression and murder, and on who can buy a gun. Same with large clips.

You can also require anyone buying a gun to having training, a background check, and err on the side of caution.

And that's going to stop all mass shootings? After all, isn't that what we are talking about here?
 
But what will our schools look like when we are done? What will our schools feel like? Is this where we are to train and nurture a free society, in the midst of assault rifles and bulletproof armor? Those things signify and communicate something quite other than freedom.

They impose an environment of fear, which can be debilitating to our youth, whom we should want to be confident, open, honest and happy. These are not the kinds of things you see in a free society, but a society at war. How bizarre is it that we would willfully take on the trappings of a society at war, while countless nations around the world — embroiled in real, live civil wars — envy our peace?

This is madness, of course. The NRA’s logic dictates that we should make our schools look like war zones to accommodate unfettered gun rights.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...eans-being-heavily-armed-and-scared-to-death/

The first step to getting mentally healthy is recognizing that you indeed have a problem. Now that you've admitted to being frightened all of the time perhaps we can help you.
 
But what will our schools look like when we are done? What will our schools feel like? Is this where we are to train and nurture a free society, in the midst of assault rifles and bulletproof armor? Those things signify and communicate something quite other than freedom.

They impose an environment of fear, which can be debilitating to our youth, whom we should want to be confident, open, honest and happy. These are not the kinds of things you see in a free society, but a society at war. How bizarre is it that we would willfully take on the trappings of a society at war, while countless nations around the world — embroiled in real, live civil wars — envy our peace?

This is madness, of course. The NRA’s logic dictates that we should make our schools look like war zones to accommodate unfettered gun rights.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...eans-being-heavily-armed-and-scared-to-death/

We only have two choices in this matter: Live with mass killings or do something to try and stop them. Trying to go against our Constitution and disarm 300 million Americans will not be the solution because it can't be done.

Disarming the population isn’t possible nor is it desireable, but you can put much tighter restrictions on the sale of weapons which have no purpose other than aggression and murder, and on who can buy a gun. Same with large clips.

You can also require anyone buying a gun to having training, a background check, and err on the side of caution.

And that's going to stop all mass shootings? After all, isn't that what we are talking about here?

What an ignorant, ill-informed comment. This idea that if it doesn’t completely stop mass shootings then it shouldn’t be done.

You cannot prevent every crime or even every shooting. But you can substantially reduce the number of murders and mass shootings just by making guns more difficult to get, and banning assault style weapons.

It’s worked in every country that has banned assault type weapons and large magazines.
 
The only thing that concerns me is the number of people who have probably never held a gun much less fired one lecturing to us about guns if you had asked people what a bump stock was before Las Vegas the vast majority would have likely thought it was someting that went on the bumper of a car.
 
But what will our schools look like when we are done? What will our schools feel like? Is this where we are to train and nurture a free society, in the midst of assault rifles and bulletproof armor? Those things signify and communicate something quite other than freedom.

They impose an environment of fear, which can be debilitating to our youth, whom we should want to be confident, open, honest and happy. These are not the kinds of things you see in a free society, but a society at war. How bizarre is it that we would willfully take on the trappings of a society at war, while countless nations around the world — embroiled in real, live civil wars — envy our peace?

This is madness, of course. The NRA’s logic dictates that we should make our schools look like war zones to accommodate unfettered gun rights.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...eans-being-heavily-armed-and-scared-to-death/

We only have two choices in this matter: Live with mass killings or do something to try and stop them. Trying to go against our Constitution and disarm 300 million Americans will not be the solution because it can't be done.

Disarming the population isn’t possible nor is it desireable, but you can put much tighter restrictions on the sale of weapons which have no purpose other than aggression and murder, and on who can buy a gun. Same with large clips.

You can also require anyone buying a gun to having training, a background check, and err on the side of caution.

And that's going to stop all mass shootings? After all, isn't that what we are talking about here?

What an ignorant, ill-informed comment. This idea that if it doesn’t completely stop mass shootings then it shouldn’t be done.

You cannot prevent every crime or even every shooting. But you can substantially reduce the number of murders and mass shootings just by making guns more difficult to get, and banning assault style weapons.

It’s worked in every country that has banned assault type weapons and large magazines.

No, it hasn't. And what do you think the Democrats would do if we created all these new restrictions and still had mass shootings? Think they would be happy just having less of them? Of course not. They would be insisting on more regulations, and after the next shooting, more regulations. And keep making regulations until it was nearly impossible for law abiding citizens to reasonably buy or own a gun.

Here's the thing: the only difference between an AR and a semi-automatic handgun is the AR looks scarier. That's all. They both shoot bullets as fast as you can squeeze the trigger, they are both high powered depending on the pistol you buy, and they both have the ability to kill the same amount of people. So nothing gets solved.

We had an assault weapons ban for ten years in this country, and after those ten years, the statistics showed it didn't do any good. Why should we inflict our government with millions of dollars of costs to start a program that didn't work the first time?
 
If I walk down the street and am gunned downed by a guy who drops his AR-15 on the street and it discharges into my face, the gun nuts would blame me for not wearing full body armor.


If you're walking down the street with your AR-15 and a round in the chamber your name is probably Murphy. If you drop it and it goes off hitting you we would just nominate you for a Darwin award. Hope that helps your understanding.

Interesting lesson in handling an AR-15, but you should tell it to someone who ownes one. I got over playing "solider" when I was 7.
 
It may have been only you that mutated. Every generation is different, work ethic for example, current batch of kids appear to have less of a work ethic than their parents, parents different from their parents. I'd say 200 years ago a lot was different.
No each generation is still human. The only thing thats changed is the killing power and efficiency of the weapons.

No, someone good with a Japanese Katana even from 500 years ago could easily kill more than 17 in that time frame.
With a blunderbuss from 1600 one could kill 17 people with a single shot.
Hand held weapons have not changed much in killing power or efficiency.
In fact, after WWI, there was a huge surplus of unused Thompson Machineguns they were selling mail order for $25.
If someone had an 1890 pump shotgun, they would easily have killed 30 or more in the same time frame.

The false notion it is the fault of the tools somehow, is just totally wrong.
The problem is the students bulling victims like Cruz and causing the violence.
Its not the fault of the tool I just said thats the thing that changed the most.

Which brings us back to it's people that have changed the most.
People havent changed. Their environment has changed. The people that are doing this feel that they are exacting revenge.

Ok, then their environment has changed them.
 
It may have been only you that mutated. Every generation is different, work ethic for example, current batch of kids appear to have less of a work ethic than their parents, parents different from their parents. I'd say 200 years ago a lot was different.
No each generation is still human. The only thing thats changed is the killing power and efficiency of the weapons.

Each generation is still human? Hmmm...the weapon is still a gun.
A more powerful and efficient killing weapon nowdays. I dont see that same change or even rate of change reflected in humans.

That is totally wrong.
School shootings are not only fairly new, but rising drastically, and that has nothing at all to do with weapons. It has to do entirely with heightened emotions and lack of responsibility.
Here is the graph of school shootings. Back around 1920 is when full auto weapons were the cheapest and easiest to get, without any licensing requirements at all.

29uo8wg.jpg
In the 1920's was the environment that Drumpf harkens to when he says MAGA.

In the 1920's liberals weren't as wacked out as they are now.
 
We had no problem with gun rights until democrat lunatics took over. There were no mass shootings and no school shootings.
One of the first things they did was to take prayer out of school. Been downhill since then.

Oh, there is student prayer in schools! You should see them right before I give them a test!
 
But what will our schools look like when we are done? What will our schools feel like? Is this where we are to train and nurture a free society, in the midst of assault rifles and bulletproof armor? Those things signify and communicate something quite other than freedom.

They impose an environment of fear, which can be debilitating to our youth, whom we should want to be confident, open, honest and happy. These are not the kinds of things you see in a free society, but a society at war. How bizarre is it that we would willfully take on the trappings of a society at war, while countless nations around the world — embroiled in real, live civil wars — envy our peace?

This is madness, of course. The NRA’s logic dictates that we should make our schools look like war zones to accommodate unfettered gun rights.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...eans-being-heavily-armed-and-scared-to-death/

We only have two choices in this matter: Live with mass killings or do something to try and stop them. Trying to go against our Constitution and disarm 300 million Americans will not be the solution because it can't be done.

Disarming the population isn’t possible nor is it desireable, but you can put much tighter restrictions on the sale of weapons which have no purpose other than aggression and murder, and on who can buy a gun. Same with large clips.

You can also require anyone buying a gun to having training, a background check, and err on the side of caution.


Is that what you use to smoke your marijuana? Your ignorance of guns is showing again.
 
People havent changed. Their environment has changed. The people that are doing this feel that they are exacting revenge.

You are not going to solve the real problem until you see people have changed. Identify what has changed in them and start a better change.
The real problem is that they no longer feel in control. I'm not going to pander to their wishes.
 
But what will our schools look like when we are done? What will our schools feel like? Is this where we are to train and nurture a free society, in the midst of assault rifles and bulletproof armor? Those things signify and communicate something quite other than freedom.

They impose an environment of fear, which can be debilitating to our youth, whom we should want to be confident, open, honest and happy. These are not the kinds of things you see in a free society, but a society at war. How bizarre is it that we would willfully take on the trappings of a society at war, while countless nations around the world — embroiled in real, live civil wars — envy our peace?

This is madness, of course. The NRA’s logic dictates that we should make our schools look like war zones to accommodate unfettered gun rights.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...eans-being-heavily-armed-and-scared-to-death/


HUH???????????????? So let's see: You're a teacher in a school and you hear shots being fired and students screaming. Will you be scared to death if you are heavily armed or if you are defenseless?
Depends. The cop was armed and he was shaking in his boots.
 
But what will our schools look like when we are done? What will our schools feel like? Is this where we are to train and nurture a free society, in the midst of assault rifles and bulletproof armor? Those things signify and communicate something quite other than freedom.

They impose an environment of fear, which can be debilitating to our youth, whom we should want to be confident, open, honest and happy. These are not the kinds of things you see in a free society, but a society at war. How bizarre is it that we would willfully take on the trappings of a society at war, while countless nations around the world — embroiled in real, live civil wars — envy our peace?

This is madness, of course. The NRA’s logic dictates that we should make our schools look like war zones to accommodate unfettered gun rights.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...eans-being-heavily-armed-and-scared-to-death/

I think you're missing two points.

1) We're already scared to death.

2) The purpose of the "heavily-armed" is BECAUSE being helpless and defenseless justifiably scares anyone sane.
Why are you scared?

Why do you think being heavily armed will keep a bullet from striking you?
 
The real problem is that they no longer feel in control. I'm not going to pander to their wishes.

Control is sought by the weak. Understanding that you make the best of every situation is power.
Not true. Everyone seeks control. The problem that drives some people bat shit is loss of control or loss of perceived control.

Ah, you fell for the trap, this is good. More power for me.
There was no trap. You just didnt know what you were talking about. :rolleyes:
 

Forum List

Back
Top