Files seized at Mar-a-Lago include material on foreign nation’s nuclear capabilities

No the Traitor did say the F.B.I. did plant classifed material, you are attepting to quibble and you are failing. In other words YOU ARE A LIAR!
prove they didn't.

why else would you say TURN CAMERAS OFF AND DON'T WATCH US!!!???
 
That's how it works in he legal arena.....thanks for playing.

LOL!!! what? well if it weren't for the back pocket judge in FLA putting in motion to force the DOJ to appeal - now we see real legality kicking in.

& it looks like judge dearie ain't no bought off hack.
 
What exactly is the "it" you are claiming hasn't been proven?

And maybe you can elaborate on what you mean by "proven."

Do you mean it as in "has not risen to YOUR level of credible proof?"

And if so what would that be?

Because I have seen plenty of PROOF!

the troll also keeps harping on the 'classified' stuff ... when even if there wasn't ( there was though )...

.... the proven fact is donny stole several THOUSAND files that did not belong to him. AND that is already PROVEN by his lying fraudulent
( & in bigley trouble ) lawyer, who signed off on the retrieved GOVERNMENT files in their initial search months ago.
 
LOL!!! what? well if it weren't for the back pocket judge in FLA putting in motion to force the DOJ to appeal - now we see real legality kicking in.

& it looks like judge dearie ain't no bought off hack.
When a jidge makes a decision you don't like, you claim corruption.

Cute.
 
reuters & AP are excellent sources.
And they are both biased.

Reuters? They're the 'unbiased' rag that shitcanned a data scientist for revealing the truth.

White Thomson Reuters data scientist says he was FIRED from $350k role by woke bullies for sharing data showing cops kill more unarmed white people than black people - and claiming BLM contributed to deaths of thousands​

  • Thomson Reuters' former director of data science Zac Kriegman claimed he was fired after sharing his research on race and police killings with colleagues
  • Kriegman posted stats showing cops in the US killed more unarmed white people than black people since 2015
  • He said he was ridiculed and bullied by colleagues, and when he asked leadership for help, his post was taken down and he was fired
  • Kriegman said he wanted his research to spark a conversation amongst reporters at the company's newswire service about how to cover the issue
  • He's the latest person to claim they faced hostility from a woke mob running rampant in the workplace
  • Thomson Reuters data scientist said he was FIRED by woke BLM bullies
 
And they are both biased.

Reuters? They're the 'unbiased' rag that shitcanned a data scientist for revealing the truth.

White Thomson Reuters data scientist says he was FIRED from $350k role by woke bullies for sharing data showing cops kill more unarmed white people than black people - and claiming BLM contributed to deaths of thousands​

  • Thomson Reuters' former director of data science Zac Kriegman claimed he was fired after sharing his research on race and police killings with colleagues
  • Kriegman posted stats showing cops in the US killed more unarmed white people than black people since 2015
  • He said he was ridiculed and bullied by colleagues, and when he asked leadership for help, his post was taken down and he was fired
  • Kriegman said he wanted his research to spark a conversation amongst reporters at the company's newswire service about how to cover the issue
  • He's the latest person to claim they faced hostility from a woke mob running rampant in the workplace
  • Thomson Reuters data scientist said he was FIRED by woke BLM bullies

Reuters​



Reuters - Least Biased - Not Left - Not Right - Credible
Factual Reporting: Very High - Credible - Reliable


LEAST BIASED​

These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes). The reporting is factual and usually sourced. These are the most credible media sources. See all Least Biases sources.
  • Overall, we rate Reuters Least Biased based on objective reporting and Very High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing of information with minimal bias and a clean fact check record.

Detailed Report​

Bias Rating: LEAST BIASED
Factual Reporting: VERY HIGH
Country: United Kingdom
Press Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: News Agency
Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY

History

Founded in 1851, Reuters is the world’s leading international multimedia news agency. It is headquartered in London, United Kingdom.
Reuters was founded by Paul Julius Reuter, a German-born immigrant who moved to London and opened an office that transmitted stock market quotations between London and Paris via the new Calais-Dover cable. He had previously used pigeons to fly stock prices between Aachen and Brussels, which was also common to dispatch news. However, the Agence Havas (the predecessor of today’s AFP) was the first to start using the Morse telegraph. According to an article titled ”CHRONOLOGY: Reuters, from pigeons to multimedia merger,” overland telegraph and undersea cables enabled Reuters to expand its service beyond Europe to the Far East in 1872 and South America by 1874.
During both World Wars, Reuters came under pressure from the British government to serve British interests. In 1941 Reuters avoided this pressure by restructuring itself as a private company. Stephen J. Adler is the President and Editor-in-Chief of Reuters.
Read our government and media profile in the United Kingdom.

Reuters
 
Not in unsecured locations. Look at the idiotic shit you are willing to say for an orange pile of shit would wouldn't piss on you if you were in fire.
They had to break into a safe and a double locked room while ordering the secret service agents out..... just to get the documents... the FBI even brought a safecracker with them you fool.....
So go fuck yourself biden voter....
 

Reuters​



Reuters - Least Biased - Not Left - Not Right - Credible
Factual Reporting: Very High - Credible - Reliable


LEAST BIASED

These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes). The reporting is factual and usually sourced. These are the most credible media sources. See all Least Biases sources.
  • Overall, we rate Reuters Least Biased based on objective reporting and Very High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing of information with minimal bias and a clean fact check record.

Detailed Report​

Bias Rating: LEAST BIASED
Factual Reporting: VERY HIGH
Country: United Kingdom
Press Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: News Agency
Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY

History

Founded in 1851, Reuters is the world’s leading international multimedia news agency. It is headquartered in London, United Kingdom.
Reuters was founded by Paul Julius Reuter, a German-born immigrant who moved to London and opened an office that transmitted stock market quotations between London and Paris via the new Calais-Dover cable. He had previously used pigeons to fly stock prices between Aachen and Brussels, which was also common to dispatch news. However, the Agence Havas (the predecessor of today’s AFP) was the first to start using the Morse telegraph. According to an article titled ”CHRONOLOGY: Reuters, from pigeons to multimedia merger,” overland telegraph and undersea cables enabled Reuters to expand its service beyond Europe to the Far East in 1872 and South America by 1874.
During both World Wars, Reuters came under pressure from the British government to serve British interests. In 1941 Reuters avoided this pressure by restructuring itself as a private company. Stephen J. Adler is the President and Editor-in-Chief of Reuters.
Read our government and media profile in the United Kingdom.

Reuters

Bias is bias. Now they've gone woke in their reporting which will end up affecting their bias.

Your and many others of your persuasion, can not accept factual, sourced reporting from other sites on either side of your bias spectrum. That does not automatically make their factual, sourced reporting wrong.

Your 'least biased' sites, which are claimed to be biased, by your media fact checker, leave out key information which others from 'non officially least biased' sites do report.....but they're biased......LOL

You see this on legacy media which is famous to ignore certain stories and Fox or others end up reporting on. Great example was Eagle Pass in the early days of the Biden Presidential Experiment on Border Control. Legacy ignored the story only to be scooped when Biden had Fox camera helo's chased away......then it was a story.
 

Forum List

Back
Top