Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
therightscoop.com
So, the usual. When asked for evidence, you pissed yourself and ran. Same as you do every time.*yawn* How much are you getting paid for this ludicrous gas-lighting, Comrade?
What injury did Schumer threaten?Was he gonna beat him up? Shoot him? Slap him with his dick?Yes, we're talking about Schumer's that you insist aren't there.
Is anybody buying your bullshit?
So what Schumer said wasn't a threat?What injury did Schumer threaten?Was he gonna beat him up? Shoot him? Slap him with his dick?
Is this the "threat" you're talking about?
“I want to tell you Gorsuch. I want to tell you Kavanaugh. You have released the whirlwind and you will pay the price. You won’t know what hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions.”
I was kind of looking for a proper threat, like "Gorsuch and Kavanaugh, I'm going to shoot your wives" or something like that, but all I could find was this non-threat he said.
You will pay the price,and you won't know what hit you isn't a very specific threat, now, is it?So what Schumer said wasn't a threat?
Sorry but liberals set the standard when they claimed "peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard" as being a threat.
You have no conscience. Everything the left is guilty of, you accuse the right. No one believes it. It's simply not credible.So, the usual. When asked for evidence, you pissed yourself and ran. Same as you do every time.
How do you manage to look in the mirror without puking? If I was as gutless as you are, I'd off myself out of shame. But then, I have a conscience.
Now, run along. Putin's member won't polish itself, you know.
Never mind. You're incapable of criticizing your fellow Democrats.What injury did Schumer threaten?Was he gonna beat him up? Shoot him? Slap him with his dick?
That's not what he said try again.You will pay the price,and you won't know what hit you isn't a very specific threat, now, is it?
I can tell you really want that to be a specific threat, but it isn't.That's not what he said try again.
“I want to tell you Gorsuch. I want to tell you Kavanaugh. You have released the whirlwind and you will pay the price. You won’t know what hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions.”
you will pay the price. What price?
you want know what hit you. (The what )bullet car firebomb
How wasn't it a threat? Threat of impeachment, threat of death both are threat's. You will pay the price.I can tell you really want that to be a specific threat, but it isn't.
Schumer wasn't joking neither was Maxine waters get in their faceAugust 9 2016
Donald J. Trump on Tuesday appeared to raise the possibility that gun rights supporters could take matters into their own hands if Hillary Clinton is elected president and appoints judges who favor stricter gun control measures.
“If she gets to pick her judges, nothing you can do, folks,” Mr. Trump said, as the crowd began to boo. He quickly added: “Although the Second Amendment people — maybe there is, I don’t know.”
NOTHING to see there, of course, the orange retard was 'joking".
“I want to tell you Gorsuch. I want to tell you Kavanaugh. You have released the whirlwind and you will pay the price. You won’t know what hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions.”
you will pay the price. What price?
you want know what hit you.
OMG! Lock him up.
Like I stated..............................."LOCK HIM UP".Schumer wasn't joking neither was Maxine waters get in their face
All threats are not equal. The threat of impeachment was included in the constitution, and every Supreme Court justice knows his every ruling could be subject to that. Are you too dumb to understand that?How wasn't it a threat? Threat of impeachment, threat of death both are threat's. You will pay the price.
So now we can parse words and demand a high standard of proof. Let a Republican say to protest peacefully and the nuts think he's inciting insurrection.And what part of that was a threat instead of a statement of fact?
I think Schumer's sycophants are too dumb to understand that.All threats are not equal. The threat of impeachment was included in the constitution, and every Supreme Court justice knows his every ruling could be subject to that. Are you too dumb to understand that?
