Failed predictions of global warming deniers

Status
Not open for further replies.

Crick

Gold Member
May 10, 2014
27,875
5,291
290
N/A
1) Warming will end
2) Warming will end soon
3) Warming has ended
4) There has been no warming
5) Warming will be good for us
6) Just like the QAnon "Storm", the world will soon discover that scientists have been making it all up to simultaneously get rich and destroy human society which will lead to a bloody revolution that will end the global warming hysteria and put Trump back in the White House in charge of the entire planet regardless of any silly "election results".
 
OK so which is it?

R.c77c04c4a7054773f1eb58be6a778b98
 
Longer growing seasons, higher crop yields, fewer deaths from cold weather.

We're doomed!!!

Quick, stop using fossil fuels.
Some good, some bad. Here is some reading material for you Todd.

 
Scientists come to opposite conclusions about the causes of recent climate change depending on which datasets they consider. For instance, the panels on the left lead to the conclusion that global temperature changes since the mid-19th century have been mostly due to human-caused emissions, especially carbon dioxide (CO2), i.e., the conclusion reached by the UN IPCC reports. In contrast, the panels on the right lead to the exact opposite conclusion, i.e., that the global temperature changes since the mid-19th century have been mostly due to natural cycles, chiefly long-term changes in the energy emitted by the Sun.

1632186412722.png

Both sets of panels are based on published scientific data, but each uses different datasets and assumptions. On the left, it is assumed that the available temperature records are unaffected by the urban heat island problem, and so all stations are used, whether urban or rural. On the right, only rural stations are used. Meanwhile, on the left, solar output is modeled using the low variability dataset that has been chosen for the IPCC’s upcoming (in 2021/2022) 6th Assessment Reports. This implies zero contribution from natural factors to the long-term warming. On the right, solar output is modeled using a high variability dataset used by the team in charge of NASA’s ACRIM sun-monitoring satellites. This implies that most, if not all, of the long-term temperature changes are due to natural factors.

Here is the link to the full paper.
ShieldSquare Captcha
 
1) Warming will end
2) Warming will end soon
3) Warming has ended
4) There has been no warming
They said "warming will end, will end soon, has ended, has been no warming." They never predicted that Democrats would stop claiming warming was happening.
5) Warming will be good for us
6) Just like the QAnon "Storm", the world will soon discover that scientists have been making it all up to simultaneously get rich and destroy human society which will lead to a bloody revolution that will end the global warming hysteria and put Trump back in the White House in charge of the entire planet regardless of any silly "election results".
QAnon , again?
 
1) Warming will end
2) Warming will end soon
3) Warming has ended
4) There has been no warming
5) Warming will be good for us
6) Just like the QAnon "Storm", the world will soon discover that scientists have been making it all up to simultaneously get rich and destroy human society which will lead to a bloody revolution that will end the global warming hysteria and put Trump back in the White House in charge of the entire planet regardless of any silly "election results".

You really went there, huh?

 
Some good, some bad. Here is some reading material for you Todd.

All the things attributed to manmade Goebbels warming.....

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top