Exclusive: Fani Willis Possesses Evidence Exonerating Georgia’s Alternate Electors and Trump

[MAGA Macho Man]

This malicious prosecutor should be charged, tried, convicted, disbarred, and sentenced to prison.

Fani Willis withheld exculpatory evidence
Evidence Exonerating Georgia’s Alternate Electors

In her Aug. 14 laughable indictment of Trump, Fani Willis alleged
<><>the existence of Republican electors for Trump constituted an unlawful “conspiracy” to overturn 2020 election results.
<><>Willis falsely claimed these alternate electors “unlawfully falsely held themselves out” as Georgia’s “duly elected and qualified” presidential electors.
<><>She further insisted these electors intentionally attempted to “mislead.”

However, among the documents Willis has in her possession obtained during her years-long investigation of Republicans was a meeting transcript refuting her allegations which she willfully withheld.

<><>A transcript of the Georgia Republican electors’ Dec. 14, 2020, meeting, obtained by The Federalist, explicitly shows the intent

<><>that casting alternate electors was not to impersonate public officers, as Willis alleged, but to lawfully preserve Trump’s legal challenge to the state’s election results.

<><> documents specifically noted how the electors were acting as “Republican nominees for Presidential Elector,” not as “duly elected and qualified” presidential electors.

The same facts asserted in this Georgia case are applicable to those charged for a similar offense in Michigan. People forget (or never knew) that Hawaii sent three sets of electors to DC in the 1960 race, which was undecided when they left Hawaii for DC.

Fani Willis Has Evidence Exonerating Georgia's Alternate Electors

Fulton County DA Fani Willis possesses evidence exonerating Republicans she's targeting in her 98-page Georgia indictment.

thefederalist.com

 

[airplanemechanic]

But Drumph! He caused an erection on Jan 6th or something.

 

[playtime]

The Federalist – Bias and Credibility​

Found this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media:

---

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE​

A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

• Overall, we rate The Federalist Questionable and far-Right Biased based on story selection and editorial positions that always favor the right and promotion of propaganda, conspiracy theories, and numerous failed fact checks.

---

Detailed Report​

Questionable Reasoning: Conspiracy Theories, Propaganda, Failed Fact Checks
Bias Rating: RIGHT
Factual Reporting: MIXED
Country: USA
Press Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-federalist/

dismissed.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

This malicious prosecutor should be charged, tried, convicted, disbarred, and sentenced to prison.

Fani Willis withheld exculpatory evidence
Evidence Exonerating Georgia’s Alternate Electors

In her Aug. 14 laughable indictment of Trump, Fani Willis alleged
<><>the existence of Republican electors for Trump constituted an unlawful “conspiracy” to overturn 2020 election results.
<><>Willis falsely claimed these alternate electors “unlawfully falsely held themselves out” as Georgia’s “duly elected and qualified” presidential electors.
<><>She further insisted these electors intentionally attempted to “mislead.”

However, among the documents Willis has in her possession obtained during her years-long investigation of Republicans was a meeting transcript refuting her allegations which she willfully withheld.

<><>A transcript of the Georgia Republican electors’ Dec. 14, 2020, meeting, obtained by The Federalist, explicitly shows the intent

<><>that casting alternate electors was not to impersonate public officers, as Willis alleged, but to lawfully preserve Trump’s legal challenge to the state’s election results.

<><> documents specifically noted how the electors were acting as “Republican nominees for Presidential Elector,” not as “duly elected and qualified” presidential electors.

The same facts asserted in this Georgia case are applicable to those charged for a similar offense in Michigan. People forget (or never knew) that Hawaii sent three sets of electors to DC in the 1960 race, which was undecided when they left Hawaii for DC.

Fani Willis Has Evidence Exonerating Georgia's Alternate Electors

Fulton County DA Fani Willis possesses evidence exonerating Republicans she's targeting in her 98-page Georgia indictment.

thefederalist.com

I'm starting to lose track of all the "BREAKING" bombshells that you've been serving up here. So far, the only thing breaking is Rudy and Sidney's wind.
Look...they got them. May as well sit back and let the justice system handle them at this point.

 

[Curried Goats]

This malicious prosecutor should be charged, tried, convicted, disbarred, and sentenced to prison.

Fani Willis withheld exculpatory evidence
Evidence Exonerating Georgia’s Alternate Electors

In her Aug. 14 laughable indictment of Trump, Fani Willis alleged
<><>the existence of Republican electors for Trump constituted an unlawful “conspiracy” to overturn 2020 election results.
<><>Willis falsely claimed these alternate electors “unlawfully falsely held themselves out” as Georgia’s “duly elected and qualified” presidential electors.
<><>She further insisted these electors intentionally attempted to “mislead.”

However, among the documents Willis has in her possession obtained during her years-long investigation of Republicans was a meeting transcript refuting her allegations which she willfully withheld.

<><>A transcript of the Georgia Republican electors’ Dec. 14, 2020, meeting, obtained by The Federalist, explicitly shows the intent

<><>that casting alternate electors was not to impersonate public officers, as Willis alleged, but to lawfully preserve Trump’s legal challenge to the state’s election results.

<><> documents specifically noted how the electors were acting as “Republican nominees for Presidential Elector,” not as “duly elected and qualified” presidential electors.

The same facts asserted in this Georgia case are applicable to those charged for a similar offense in Michigan. People forget (or never knew) that Hawaii sent three sets of electors to DC in the 1960 race, which was undecided when they left Hawaii for DC.

Fani Willis Has Evidence Exonerating Georgia's Alternate Electors

Fulton County DA Fani Willis possesses evidence exonerating Republicans she's targeting in her 98-page Georgia indictment.

thefederalist.com

Did they have the legal authority to preserve Trump's legal challenges? If so where did this legal authority come from?

 

[surada]

This malicious prosecutor should be charged, tried, convicted, disbarred, and sentenced to prison.

Fani Willis withheld exculpatory evidence
Evidence Exonerating Georgia’s Alternate Electors

In her Aug. 14 laughable indictment of Trump, Fani Willis alleged
<><>the existence of Republican electors for Trump constituted an unlawful “conspiracy” to overturn 2020 election results.
<><>Willis falsely claimed these alternate electors “unlawfully falsely held themselves out” as Georgia’s “duly elected and qualified” presidential electors.
<><>She further insisted these electors intentionally attempted to “mislead.”

However, among the documents Willis has in her possession obtained during her years-long investigation of Republicans was a meeting transcript refuting her allegations which she willfully withheld.

<><>A transcript of the Georgia Republican electors’ Dec. 14, 2020, meeting, obtained by The Federalist, explicitly shows the intent

<><>that casting alternate electors was not to impersonate public officers, as Willis alleged, but to lawfully preserve Trump’s legal challenge to the state’s election results.

<><> documents specifically noted how the electors were acting as “Republican nominees for Presidential Elector,” not as “duly elected and qualified” presidential electors.

The same facts asserted in this Georgia case are applicable to those charged for a similar offense in Michigan. People forget (or never knew) that Hawaii sent three sets of electors to DC in the 1960 race, which was undecided when they left Hawaii for DC.

Fani Willis Has Evidence Exonerating Georgia's Alternate Electors

Fulton County DA Fani Willis possesses evidence exonerating Republicans she's targeting in her 98-page Georgia indictment.

thefederalist.com

It's the Federalist. .. Lacks all credibility. It's just another tabloid rag.

 

[Anomalism]

The Federalist – Bias and Credibility​

Found this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media:

---

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE​

A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

• Overall, we rate The Federalist Questionable and far-Right Biased based on story selection and editorial positions that always favor the right and promotion of propaganda, conspiracy theories, and numerous failed fact checks.

---

Detailed Report​

Questionable Reasoning: Conspiracy Theories, Propaganda, Failed Fact Checks
Bias Rating: RIGHT
Factual Reporting: MIXED
Country: USA
Press Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-federalist/

dismissed.

Fact checking is irrelevant when there are two completely different versions of reality. Of course they're just going to laugh at your post.

 

[BluesLegend]

Dem DA illegally withholds exculpatory evidence? It's not the first time a Dem DA has broken that law. Dem DA breaks a law, news at never in a million years.

 

[airplanemechanic]

The Federalist – Bias and Credibility​

Found this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media:

---

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE​

A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

• Overall, we rate The Federalist Questionable and far-Right Biased based on story selection and editorial positions that always favor the right and promotion of propaganda, conspiracy theories, and numerous failed fact checks.

---

Detailed Report​

Questionable Reasoning: Conspiracy Theories, Propaganda, Failed Fact Checks
Bias Rating: RIGHT
Factual Reporting: MIXED
Country: USA
Press Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-federalist/

dismissed.

Your dismissal because you don't like the source is dismissed.

Here is a copy of the transcript that the Federalist is talking about.

"With the challenges to the election outcome not yet heard in court, even had Trump prevailed in his challenge, without an alternate slate of electors nominated, the victory would be moot, as there would be no electors on Trump's side to count."

In 1960 Hawaii sent 3 sets of electors in, not knowing the outcome of the election at the time.

 

[surada]

The Federalist – Bias and Credibility​

Found this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media:

---

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE​

A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

• Overall, we rate The Federalist Questionable and far-Right Biased based on story selection and editorial positions that always favor the right and promotion of propaganda, conspiracy theories, and numerous failed fact checks.

---

Detailed Report​

Questionable Reasoning: Conspiracy Theories, Propaganda, Failed Fact Checks
Bias Rating: RIGHT
Factual Reporting: MIXED
Country: USA
Press Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-federalist/

dismissed.

Thanks for posting. The Federalist is a very poor source.

 

[BluesLegend]

Thanks for posting. The Federalist is a very poor source.

Your source is Joe Biden, the guy with a 6 out of 5 Pinocchio honesty rating.

 

[playtime]

I'm starting to lose track of all the "BREAKING" bombshells that you've been serving up here. So far, the only thing breaking is Rudy and Sidney's wind.
Look...they got them. May as well sit back and let the justice system handle them at this point.

 

[playtime]

Fact checking is irrelevant when there are two completely different versions of reality.

you mean like

"Just remember, what you are seeing and what you are reading is not what's happening," Trump said. "Just stick with us..." ~ DJT

^^^ that ^^^ ?

Of course they're just going to laugh at your post.

okey dokey!

 

[playtime]

Your dismissal because you don't like the source is dismissed.

Here is a copy of the transcript that the Federalist is talking about.

"With the challenges to the election outcome not yet heard in court, even had Trump prevailed in his challenge, without an alternate slate of electors nominated, the victory would be moot, as there would be no electors on Trump's side to count."

In 1960 Hawaii sent 3 sets of electors in, not knowing the outcome of the election at the time.

except for the FACT that georgia had THREE RECOUNTS... ALL resulting in dark brandon WINNING THE STATE.

Why Hawaii 1960 isn’t the same as Trump 2020​

Although the three Democratic electors in Hawaii took the same action — signing false certificates — it does not appear they ever faced similar scrutiny, in part because of what happened next. Namely, that Hawaii’s recount ultimately did reverse the state’s election outcome.
See the 1960 Electoral College certificates that the false Trump electors say justify their gambit

Does a Decades-Old Hawaii Decision Justify Georgia’s ‘Alternate’ Electors?​

Attorneys of outgoing chairman of the state’s GOP David Shafer argue that an “act of statesmanship” in Hawaii in 1960 is justification for Shafer’s 2020 decision to convene a meeting of “alternate” electors in favor of Donald Trump.​

June 14, 2023 •

Among the possible charges, some legal analysts say, are making false statements, forgery, racketeering or conspiracy to commit election fraud.

one of those observers said they viewed the comparison of Hawaii 1960 and Georgia in 2020 as specious.


“While it’s an interesting defense, it’s also a complete nonsensical one,” said Anthony Michael Kreis, an assistant professor of law at Georgia State University. “In Hawaii in 1960, there was a legitimate debate about who had won… and that was just not the case in Georgia.”

In Georgia, we didn’t “have the secretary of state saying there’s been a mistake and officially certifying two slates,” Gardner said. “What we have is one slate of (Democratic) electors that is selected and certified according to completely lawful processes and then another slate that appoints themselves an opposing slate and decides that they’re going to just show up and hope that the vice president acts illegally and counts their votes.”
Does a Decades-Old Hawaii Decision Justify Georgia’s ‘Alternate’ Electors?

 

[airplanemechanic]

except for the FACT that georgia had THREE RECOUNTS... ALL resulting in dark brandon WINNING THE STATE.

Why Hawaii 1960 isn’t the same as Trump 2020​

Although the three Democratic electors in Hawaii took the same action — signing false certificates — it does not appear they ever faced similar scrutiny, in part because of what happened next. Namely, that Hawaii’s recount ultimately did reverse the state’s election outcome.
See the 1960 Electoral College certificates that the false Trump electors say justify their gambit

Does a Decades-Old Hawaii Decision Justify Georgia’s ‘Alternate’ Electors?​

Attorneys of outgoing chairman of the state’s GOP David Shafer argue that an “act of statesmanship” in Hawaii in 1960 is justification for Shafer’s 2020 decision to convene a meeting of “alternate” electors in favor of Donald Trump.​

June 14, 2023 •

Among the possible charges, some legal analysts say, are making false statements, forgery, racketeering or conspiracy to commit election fraud.

one of those observers said they viewed the comparison of Hawaii 1960 and Georgia in 2020 as specious.


“While it’s an interesting defense, it’s also a complete nonsensical one,” said Anthony Michael Kreis, an assistant professor of law at Georgia State University. “In Hawaii in 1960, there was a legitimate debate about who had won… and that was just not the case in Georgia.”

In Georgia, we didn’t “have the secretary of state saying there’s been a mistake and officially certifying two slates,” Gardner said. “What we have is one slate of (Democratic) electors that is selected and certified according to completely lawful processes and then another slate that appoints themselves an opposing slate and decides that they’re going to just show up and hope that the vice president acts illegally and counts their votes.”
Does a Decades-Old Hawaii Decision Justify Georgia’s ‘Alternate’ Electors?

At the time of this meeting there had not been 100 recounts. This was done before then. Trump had strong reason, as we all do, that something was amiss in GA. He did nothing that Hawaii didn't do in 1960. At the time of this meeting, NONE of his challenges had been heard in court.

Triggered?

 

[MAGA Macho Man]

except for the FACT that georgia had THREE RECOUNTS... ALL resulting in dark brandon WINNING THE STATE.

Why Hawaii 1960 isn’t the same as Trump 2020​

Although the three Democratic electors in Hawaii took the same action — signing false certificates — it does not appear they ever faced similar scrutiny, in part because of what happened next. Namely, that Hawaii’s recount ultimately did reverse the state’s election outcome.
See the 1960 Electoral College certificates that the false Trump electors say justify their gambit

Does a Decades-Old Hawaii Decision Justify Georgia’s ‘Alternate’ Electors?​

Attorneys of outgoing chairman of the state’s GOP David Shafer argue that an “act of statesmanship” in Hawaii in 1960 is justification for Shafer’s 2020 decision to convene a meeting of “alternate” electors in favor of Donald Trump.​

June 14, 2023 •

Among the possible charges, some legal analysts say, are making false statements, forgery, racketeering or conspiracy to commit election fraud.

one of those observers said they viewed the comparison of Hawaii 1960 and Georgia in 2020 as specious.


“While it’s an interesting defense, it’s also a complete nonsensical one,” said Anthony Michael Kreis, an assistant professor of law at Georgia State University. “In Hawaii in 1960, there was a legitimate debate about who had won… and that was just not the case in Georgia.”

In Georgia, we didn’t “have the secretary of state saying there’s been a mistake and officially certifying two slates,” Gardner said. “What we have is one slate of (Democratic) electors that is selected and certified according to completely lawful processes and then another slate that appoints themselves an opposing slate and decides that they’re going to just show up and hope that the vice president acts illegally and counts their votes.”
Does a Decades-Old Hawaii Decision Justify Georgia’s ‘Alternate’ Electors?

All Georgia did was recount the same fraudulent votes/ballots. Nothing was authenticated forensically.

 

[MAGA Macho Man]

At the time of this meeting there had not been 100 recounts. This was done before then. Trump had strong reason, as we all do, that something was amiss in GA. He did nothing that Hawaii didn't do in 1960.

All true!

 

[Hossfly]

Your dismissal because you don't like the source is dismissed.

Here is a copy of the transcript that the Federalist is talking about.

"With the challenges to the election outcome not yet heard in court, even had Trump prevailed in his challenge, without an alternate slate of electors nominated, the victory would be moot, as there would be no electors on Trump's side to count."

In 1960 Hawaii sent 3 sets of electors in, not knowing the outcome of the election at the time.

Demofascists always dispute the source even when the source presents official documents. The source is always fake news. Now, if CNN or WaPo is the source, well........ But CNN or WaPo never reports the same news as Fake News sites because fake news.

 

[Lastamender]

The Federalist – Bias and Credibility​

Found this insightful? Please consider sharing on your Social Media:

---

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE​

A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

• Overall, we rate The Federalist Questionable and far-Right Biased based on story selection and editorial positions that always favor the right and promotion of propaganda, conspiracy theories, and numerous failed fact checks.

---

Detailed Report​

Questionable Reasoning: Conspiracy Theories, Propaganda, Failed Fact Checks
Bias Rating: RIGHT
Factual Reporting: MIXED
Country: USA
Press Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-federalist/

dismissed.

Same rating CNN has. Next.

 

[playtime]

At the time of this meeting there had not been 100 recounts. This was done before then. Trump had strong reason, as we all do, that something was amiss in GA.

why? cause he thought GA was in the bag? after 4 years of his sliming all over the constitution? how did kemp win over stacy abrahms & Q anon betty & any other (R) that won down ticket?

huh? huh huh HUH???

He did nothing that Hawaii didn't do in 1960.

'cept completely make up lies - such as suitcases with fake ballots? yada yada yada & the 2 black ladies who were poll workers thatn he & squid boy defamed? & why did the fake electors get nailed if everything were all kosher?

HUH HUH HUH???

the time of this meeting, NONE of his challenges had been heard in court.

Triggered?

i'm not triggered at all' cause the truth is allllll gonna come out LIVE & ON TV.

october 23, streamed on youtube & probably on the regular networks too.