Ex-trump lawyer Ty Cobb suggested trump could be disqualified from office over his handling of January 6 riot

BertramN

Diamond Member
Jul 15, 2016
3,470
3,184
1,970
.
Ex-trump lawyer Ty Cobb suggested trump could be disqualified from office over his handling of January 6 riot

During 2017 and 2018, Cobb represented trump as part of the White House counsel. Also a former federal prosecutor, Cobb understands the true scope of the warrant authorized to search trump's Mar-a-Lago compound.

While speaking to CBS chief Washington correspondent Major Garrett, Cobb said, “The search warrant is unusually large and broad.” and that “It's very, very comprehensive in terms of the types of documents that the government could take.”

Continuing, Cobb explained, “For example, you can take any box that has a document. You can take any box adjacent to a box that has it.” He then added, "Those are pretty broad parameters."

Cobb feels the Justice Department investigation into whether trump mishandled White House documents, some of which are highly classified, is really about a broader inquiry into potential crimes related to the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot and efforts to overturn the 2020 election. So, the documents investigation is the hardly the biggest legal threat trump faces.

“‘I think the president is in serious legal water, not so much because of the search, but because of the obstructive activity he took in connection with the Jan. 6 proceeding,” Cobb said. “I think that and the attempts to interfere in the election count in Georgia, Arizona, Pennsylvania and perhaps Michigan. That was the first time in American history that a president unconstitutionally attempted to remain in power illegally.’”

Congress could easily bar trump from holding office again under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution, which provides that no one who "shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion" against a government body or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof" should serve in public office.

What Cobb has apparently forgotten is the voting record of the Senate during trump’s administration and since the voters removed him from office. The moderate Senate Democrats only voted against trump during his impeachment trials, like the moderate Democrats in the House, they were confident the Republican majority in the Senate would vote trump "not guilty".

The moderate Senate Democrats have Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema (and others if necessary) to protect Mitch McConnell and his Republican minority’s policies that serve only the greed of Big Business and the billionaires.

Cobb, as a former federal prosecutor, should know full well that trump is safe from any federal actions to end his corruption. A state-level prosecutor might succeed in getting a conviction against trump, but the appeals process will keep trump free to become POTUS in 2024, and shortly after, dictator.







.
 
.
Ex-trump lawyer Ty Cobb suggested trump could be disqualified from office over his handling of January 6 riot

During 2017 and 2018, Cobb represented trump as part of the White House counsel. Also a former federal prosecutor, Cobb understands the true scope of the warrant authorized to search trump's Mar-a-Lago compound.

While speaking to CBS chief Washington correspondent Major Garrett, Cobb said, “The search warrant is unusually large and broad.” and that “It's very, very comprehensive in terms of the types of documents that the government could take.”

Continuing, Cobb explained, “For example, you can take any box that has a document. You can take any box adjacent to a box that has it.” He then added, "Those are pretty broad parameters."

Cobb feels the Justice Department investigation into whether trump mishandled White House documents, some of which are highly classified, is really about a broader inquiry into potential crimes related to the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot and efforts to overturn the 2020 election. So, the documents investigation is the hardly the biggest legal threat trump faces.

“‘I think the president is in serious legal water, not so much because of the search, but because of the obstructive activity he took in connection with the Jan. 6 proceeding,” Cobb said. “I think that and the attempts to interfere in the election count in Georgia, Arizona, Pennsylvania and perhaps Michigan. That was the first time in American history that a president unconstitutionally attempted to remain in power illegally.’”

Congress could easily bar trump from holding office again under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution, which provides that no one who "shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion" against a government body or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof" should serve in public office.

What Cobb has apparently forgotten is the voting record of the Senate during trump’s administration and since the voters removed him from office. The moderate Senate Democrats only voted against trump during his impeachment trials, like the moderate Democrats in the House, they were confident the Republican majority in the Senate would vote trump "not guilty".

The moderate Senate Democrats have Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema (and others if necessary) to protect Mitch McConnell and his Republican minority’s policies that serve only the greed of Big Business and the billionaires.

Cobb, as a former federal prosecutor, should know full well that trump is safe from any federal actions to end his corruption. A state-level prosecutor might succeed in getting a conviction against trump, but the appeals process will keep trump free to become POTUS in 2024, and shortly after, dictator.







.
Nope.... Read the US Constitution... Then come back and tell me what is exclusionary for a candidate.
 
lmao-rofl.gif
 
:rolleyes: So... some former employee that is disgruntled and humiliated because Trump fired them for being incompetent is now saying mean things about the guy who fired them.

So fucking what?

I'm sure a lot of the people I had to fire may hold a grudge too. BFD.
 
Congress could easily bar trump from holding office again under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution, which provides that no one who "shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion" against a government body or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof" should serve in public office.
There's a little problem this supposition. The legislative branch of our government does not have the power to disqualify a citizen from running to be president. The Constitution is the ULTIMATE authority and the basis for all laws. It is very clear concerning the qualifications for being the POTUS. It's also crystal clear about disqualifying factors.

Disqualification comes from being Impeached and REMOVED by Senate conviction (that's a no, X2) OR being convicted of Treason against the U.S.

Were you aware that our Constitution only specifically defines one single crime? Just one. It goes into great detail about the necessary elements for a prosecution for treason. You should give it a read. Basically it comes down to the president actively funding or mustering TROOPS to fight against America in war OR to give "aid and comfort" for the same situation. IOW, Treason has nothing at all to do with political decisions, or even expressing hate for the nation. In fact, you can even be part of a conspiracy to harm the nation and STILL not meet the standard for Treason. It is defined by ACTIONS during time of war. In short, you got nothin' and he's running in '24.
 
Uh huh, sure. :itsok:

Ever notice how first these boobs all tell you that everyone on Trump's team or around him are a criminal, incompetent and not to be believed about anything, yet they constantly go out trying to find these very same people to side with them in some way on some issue so they can then QUOTE THEM as an unimpeachable authority???! :cuckoo:
 
There's a little problem this supposition. The legislative branch of our government does not have the power to disqualify a citizen from running to be president. The Constitution is the ULTIMATE authority and the basis for all laws. It is very clear concerning the qualifications for being the POTUS. It's also crystal clear about disqualifying factors.

Disqualification comes from being Impeached and REMOVED by Senate conviction (that's a no, X2) OR being convicted of Treason against the U.S.

Were you aware that our Constitution only specifically defines one single crime? Just one. It goes into great detail about the necessary elements for a prosecution for treason. You should give it a read. Basically it comes down to the president actively funding or mustering TROOPS to fight against America in war OR to give "aid and comfort" for the same situation. IOW, Treason has nothing at all to do with political decisions, or even expressing hate for the nation. In fact, you can even be part of a conspiracy to harm the nation and STILL not meet the standard for Treason. It is defined by ACTIONS during time of war. In short, you got nothin' and he's running in '24.


Section 3 in the 14th Amendment. They've floated the idea before.


However, it appears to me that it does NOT apply to running for President. But as I say, they've floated this idea before.
 
Yes, that is the best way to address a very angry electorate. Tell them who they can vote for.

The idiocy in these types of proposals cannot be understated.
 
.Cobb, as a former federal prosecutor, should know full well that trump is safe from any federal actions to end his corruption. A state-level prosecutor might succeed in getting a conviction against trump, but the appeals process will keep trump free to become POTUS in 2024, and shortly after, dictator.

If Trump wins in 2024 and tried to become a real dictator, he would be overthrown in a heartbeat just as Joe will be if he tries to take over the entire government and rule by executive authority alone.
 
Once Trump is prohibited from running, enemy democrats can turn their attention to whoever is next. Ron DeSantis comes to mind.
 
Trump might have trouble finding a vice prez considering the shit he pulled on Mike Pence. You know, the day trump tried to overthrow our government?
 
.
Ex-trump lawyer Ty Cobb suggested trump could be disqualified from office over his handling of January 6 riot

During 2017 and 2018, Cobb represented trump as part of the White House counsel. Also a former federal prosecutor, Cobb understands the true scope of the warrant authorized to search trump's Mar-a-Lago compound.

While speaking to CBS chief Washington correspondent Major Garrett, Cobb said, “The search warrant is unusually large and broad.” and that “It's very, very comprehensive in terms of the types of documents that the government could take.”

Continuing, Cobb explained, “For example, you can take any box that has a document. You can take any box adjacent to a box that has it.” He then added, "Those are pretty broad parameters."

Cobb feels the Justice Department investigation into whether trump mishandled White House documents, some of which are highly classified, is really about a broader inquiry into potential crimes related to the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot and efforts to overturn the 2020 election. So, the documents investigation is the hardly the biggest legal threat trump faces.

“‘I think the president is in serious legal water, not so much because of the search, but because of the obstructive activity he took in connection with the Jan. 6 proceeding,” Cobb said. “I think that and the attempts to interfere in the election count in Georgia, Arizona, Pennsylvania and perhaps Michigan. That was the first time in American history that a president unconstitutionally attempted to remain in power illegally.’”

Congress could easily bar trump from holding office again under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution, which provides that no one who "shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion" against a government body or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof" should serve in public office.

What Cobb has apparently forgotten is the voting record of the Senate during trump’s administration and since the voters removed him from office. The moderate Senate Democrats only voted against trump during his impeachment trials, like the moderate Democrats in the House, they were confident the Republican majority in the Senate would vote trump "not guilty".

The moderate Senate Democrats have Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema (and others if necessary) to protect Mitch McConnell and his Republican minority’s policies that serve only the greed of Big Business and the billionaires.

Cobb, as a former federal prosecutor, should know full well that trump is safe from any federal actions to end his corruption. A state-level prosecutor might succeed in getting a conviction against trump, but the appeals process will keep trump free to become POTUS in 2024, and shortly after, dictator.




.
Glenn Kirschner, former federal prosecutor and critic of trump recently accused the former president of committing crimes "in the harsh light of day" and reiterated his calls for an indictment.

Like another former federal prosecutor, Ty Cobb, it seems Kirschner has also forgotten the voting record of the Senate during trump’s administration, and in the months since the voters removed him from office. As stated in the OP, moderate Senate Democrats only voted against trump during his impeachment trials, like the moderate Democrats in the House, they were confident the Republican majority in the Senate would vote trump "not guilty". None of these corporate-owned Republicans or moderate Democrats serving in Congress truly wish to see trump punished for his many crimes. These elected criminals don’t really want trump investigated, and certainly not indicted. A trump conviction could be a severe blow to all the kleptocrats, Republican and Democrat, populating all three branches of government.

Insiders in D.C. understand the January 6 investigative committee is nothing more than political theater to kill time while mollifying voters opposed to ending democracy in this country. Following the January 3, 2023, start of the next congressional session, led by a GOP majority, the five decades of increasing corruption in the nation’s capital will achieve its ultimate goal of an oppressive (fascist) plutocracy with trump as führer.


.
 
.
Ex-trump lawyer Ty Cobb suggested trump could be disqualified from office over his handling of January 6 riot

During 2017 and 2018, Cobb represented trump as part of the White House counsel. Also a former federal prosecutor, Cobb understands the true scope of the warrant authorized to search trump's Mar-a-Lago compound.

While speaking to CBS chief Washington correspondent Major Garrett, Cobb said, “The search warrant is unusually large and broad.” and that “It's very, very comprehensive in terms of the types of documents that the government could take.”

Continuing, Cobb explained, “For example, you can take any box that has a document. You can take any box adjacent to a box that has it.” He then added, "Those are pretty broad parameters."

Cobb feels the Justice Department investigation into whether trump mishandled White House documents, some of which are highly classified, is really about a broader inquiry into potential crimes related to the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot and efforts to overturn the 2020 election. So, the documents investigation is the hardly the biggest legal threat trump faces.

“‘I think the president is in serious legal water, not so much because of the search, but because of the obstructive activity he took in connection with the Jan. 6 proceeding,” Cobb said. “I think that and the attempts to interfere in the election count in Georgia, Arizona, Pennsylvania and perhaps Michigan. That was the first time in American history that a president unconstitutionally attempted to remain in power illegally.’”

Congress could easily bar trump from holding office again under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution, which provides that no one who "shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion" against a government body or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof" should serve in public office.

What Cobb has apparently forgotten is the voting record of the Senate during trump’s administration and since the voters removed him from office. The moderate Senate Democrats only voted against trump during his impeachment trials, like the moderate Democrats in the House, they were confident the Republican majority in the Senate would vote trump "not guilty".

The moderate Senate Democrats have Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema (and others if necessary) to protect Mitch McConnell and his Republican minority’s policies that serve only the greed of Big Business and the billionaires.

Cobb, as a former federal prosecutor, should know full well that trump is safe from any federal actions to end his corruption. A state-level prosecutor might succeed in getting a conviction against trump, but the appeals process will keep trump free to become POTUS in 2024, and shortly after, dictator.







.

It is hilarious to watch the left wing clowns doing everything in their power to get Trump disqualified. All because they know they can't beat him in a fair election. Pretty pathetic when that is what you have to resort to, rather than having superior ideas that appeal Americans.
 

Forum List

Back
Top