Bullypulpit
Senior Member
Originally posted by deciophobic
this is the most unimformed response i have ever read.
#1 The fossil record is NO proof of evolution, at all.
#2 Adaption of species on the galpagos(sp) islands, you said it yourself, it's adaption, NOT evolution
#3 there is absolutely NO scientific proof to disprove creation, while there are tons of facts to disprove evolution
shall i get into them?
#4 the pope only said he accepted evolution cuz it was such a fast growing theory and stated as fact, so the church had to find a way to let evolution work(changes in the bible for example)
1. Sorry, fossil evidence shows the definite progression of changes in species over time.
2. Adaptation IS natural selection IS evolution...Get over it.
3. Umm where did you get your science education? Out of a Cracker-jack box? There is no proof of the creation you describe, so there is nothing to disprove. Tolkien's cosmology laid out in "The Silmarillion" makes about as much sense as biblical creation, and is a more entertaining red. As for evolution, at least there is evidence to support it, and it has gone fro theory to accepted scientific fact. Your proof, as I stated earlier is the product of the fever dreams of deluded sicentist-wannbe religious zealots.
4. Who care why the pop accepted evolution. It only took the Mother Church 100 years to accept it as opposed to 500 for Gallileo's work.
Religion and science donnot and cannot occupy the same ground. Religion is the realm of the subjective...the spiritual...Mythos. Science is the realm of the objective...the empirical...Logos. Trying to fit them both into the same box just ain't gonna work.