Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Shame you hate science so much.So they found a skull and they know it laid eggs and suckled its young. Great example of how evolutionists work. They take their fictional story, impose it on the evidence, and make up another fairy tale claim that they have some sort of transitional form.
Discovery of 'reptilian-mammal' fossil could rewrite history
umm ok lol“They” can say anything and because they have a white lab coat some go along without thinking.They know if it was a mammal or not. They can tell if it was a reptile or bird.Yeah, it can tell you predator or pray, carnivores or herbivores but it can’t say it laid eggs and had tits.A skull is one of the most important parts of a carcus when determining information about it.
It can tell you if it was a herbivore, omnivore, mammal, reptile, predator or prey etc
They know if it was a mammal or not. They can tell if it was a reptile or bird.Yeah, it can tell you predator or pray, carnivores or herbivores but it can’t say it laid eggs and had tits.A skull is one of the most important parts of a carcus when determining information about it.
It can tell you if it was a herbivore, omnivore, mammal, reptile, predator or prey etc
“They” can say anything and because they have a white lab coat some go along without thinking.They know if it was a mammal or not. They can tell if it was a reptile or bird.Yeah, it can tell you predator or pray, carnivores or herbivores but it can’t say it laid eggs and had tits.A skull is one of the most important parts of a carcus when determining information about it.
It can tell you if it was a herbivore, omnivore, mammal, reptile, predator or prey etc
Dude, I made my fortune in science. Better pick a new strawman.“They” can say anything and because they have a white lab coat some go along without thinking.They know if it was a mammal or not. They can tell if it was a reptile or bird.Yeah, it can tell you predator or pray, carnivores or herbivores but it can’t say it laid eggs and had tits.A skull is one of the most important parts of a carcus when determining information about it.
It can tell you if it was a herbivore, omnivore, mammal, reptile, predator or prey etc
"They" can say anything because of their deep distrust of science and the facts.
Like you do with the bible?“They” can say anything and because they have a white lab coat some go along without thinking.They know if it was a mammal or not. They can tell if it was a reptile or bird.Yeah, it can tell you predator or pray, carnivores or herbivores but it can’t say it laid eggs and had tits.A skull is one of the most important parts of a carcus when determining information about it.
It can tell you if it was a herbivore, omnivore, mammal, reptile, predator or prey etc
They can compare it. Its not 100% though. Look at the dinocephalosaurusThey know if it was a mammal or not. They can tell if it was a reptile or bird.Yeah, it can tell you predator or pray, carnivores or herbivores but it can’t say it laid eggs and had tits.A skull is one of the most important parts of a carcus when determining information about it.
It can tell you if it was a herbivore, omnivore, mammal, reptile, predator or prey etc
If I found a skull of a tiger- would i be able to tell whether the animal it came from laid eggs or had tits?
They can compare it. Its not 100% though. Look at the dinocephalosaurusThey know if it was a mammal or not. They can tell if it was a reptile or bird.Yeah, it can tell you predator or pray, carnivores or herbivores but it can’t say it laid eggs and had tits.A skull is one of the most important parts of a carcus when determining information about it.
It can tell you if it was a herbivore, omnivore, mammal, reptile, predator or prey etc
If I found a skull of a tiger- would i be able to tell whether the animal it came from laid eggs or had tits?
Dude, I made my fortune in science. Better pick a new strawman.“They” can say anything and because they have a white lab coat some go along without thinking.They know if it was a mammal or not. They can tell if it was a reptile or bird.Yeah, it can tell you predator or pray, carnivores or herbivores but it can’t say it laid eggs and had tits.A skull is one of the most important parts of a carcus when determining information about it.
It can tell you if it was a herbivore, omnivore, mammal, reptile, predator or prey etc
"They" can say anything because of their deep distrust of science and the facts.
They can compare it. Its not 100% though. Look at the dinocephalosaurusThey know if it was a mammal or not. They can tell if it was a reptile or bird.Yeah, it can tell you predator or pray, carnivores or herbivores but it can’t say it laid eggs and had tits.A skull is one of the most important parts of a carcus when determining information about it.
It can tell you if it was a herbivore, omnivore, mammal, reptile, predator or prey etc
If I found a skull of a tiger- would i be able to tell whether the animal it came from laid eggs or had tits?
Hilarious. Tigers exist so we know all about them.They can compare it. Its not 100% though. Look at the dinocephalosaurusThey know if it was a mammal or not. They can tell if it was a reptile or bird.Yeah, it can tell you predator or pray, carnivores or herbivores but it can’t say it laid eggs and had tits.A skull is one of the most important parts of a carcus when determining information about it.
It can tell you if it was a herbivore, omnivore, mammal, reptile, predator or prey etc
If I found a skull of a tiger- would i be able to tell whether the animal it came from laid eggs or had tits?
The article in Nature- though dense- explains how they reached the conclusion that the animal that the skull comes from belongs to the Haramiyida,
While far more complex- we would know that any animal of the group Haramiyida lays eggs and suckled its young, just as we would know from the skull of a Tiger- that it didn't lay any eggs and that the species would have suckled its young.
View attachment 196981They can compare it. Its not 100% though. Look at the dinocephalosaurusThey know if it was a mammal or not. They can tell if it was a reptile or bird.Yeah, it can tell you predator or pray, carnivores or herbivores but it can’t say it laid eggs and had tits.A skull is one of the most important parts of a carcus when determining information about it.
It can tell you if it was a herbivore, omnivore, mammal, reptile, predator or prey etc
If I found a skull of a tiger- would i be able to tell whether the animal it came from laid eggs or had tits?
what is thatView attachment 196981They can compare it. Its not 100% though. Look at the dinocephalosaurusThey know if it was a mammal or not. They can tell if it was a reptile or bird.Yeah, it can tell you predator or pray, carnivores or herbivores but it can’t say it laid eggs and had tits.A skull is one of the most important parts of a carcus when determining information about it.
It can tell you if it was a herbivore, omnivore, mammal, reptile, predator or prey etc
If I found a skull of a tiger- would i be able to tell whether the animal it came from laid eggs or had tits?
So they found a skull and they know it laid eggs and suckled its young. Great example of how evolutionists work. They take their fictional story, impose it on the evidence, and make up another fairy tale claim that they have some sort of transitional form.
Discovery of 'reptilian-mammal' fossil could rewrite history
They've deluded themselves into believing they can make up whatever they want these days.
And what's this rubbish? ...
“For a long time, we thought early mammals from the Cretaceous (145 to 66 million years ago) were anatomically similar and not ecologically diverse,” Huttenlocker said, in the statement. “This finding by our team and others reinforce that, even before the rise of modern mammals, ancient relatives of mammals were exploring specialty niches: insectivores, herbivores, carnivores, swimmers, gliders.”
lol now they're claiming that in the past these creatures were deliberately choosing what they wanted to be when they grew up??? Isn't that 'intelligent design', and by the creatures themselves? lol They're really desperate now..
No- you are just lying about what they said.
This finding by our team and others reinforce that, even before the rise of modern mammals, ancient relatives of mammals were exploring specialty niches: insectivores, herbivores, carnivores, swimmers, gliders.
Nothing about intelligent design or that the creatures were making a conscious decision to be an insectivore.
No- you are just lying about what they said.
This finding by our team and others reinforce that, even before the rise of modern mammals, ancient relatives of mammals were exploring specialty niches: insectivores, herbivores, carnivores, swimmers, gliders.
Nothing about intelligent design or that the creatures were making a conscious decision to be an insectivore
Everyone knows it was really the Sky Father.
l
So they found a skull and they know it laid eggs and suckled its young. Great example of how evolutionists work. They take their fictional story, impose it on the evidence, and make up another fairy tale claim that they have some sort of transitional form.
Discovery of 'reptilian-mammal' fossil could rewrite history
They've deluded themselves into believing they can make up whatever they want these days.
And what's this rubbish? ...
“For a long time, we thought early mammals from the Cretaceous (145 to 66 million years ago) were anatomically similar and not ecologically diverse,” Huttenlocker said, in the statement. “This finding by our team and others reinforce that, even before the rise of modern mammals, ancient relatives of mammals were exploring specialty niches: insectivores, herbivores, carnivores, swimmers, gliders.”
lol now they're claiming that in the past these creatures were deliberately choosing what they wanted to be when they grew up??? Isn't that 'intelligent design', and by the creatures themselves? lol They're really desperate now..
No- you are just lying about what they said.
This finding by our team and others reinforce that, even before the rise of modern mammals, ancient relatives of mammals were exploring specialty niches: insectivores, herbivores, carnivores, swimmers, gliders.
Nothing about intelligent design or that the creatures were making a conscious decision to be an insectivore.
No- you are just lying about what they said.
This finding by our team and others reinforce that, even before the rise of modern mammals, ancient relatives of mammals were exploring specialty niches: insectivores, herbivores, carnivores, swimmers, gliders.
Nothing about intelligent design or that the creatures were making a conscious decision to be an insectivore
lol you always fail at these attempts. It's getting almost comical.
Everyone knows it was really the Sky Father.
Are atoms self aware?
Everyone knows it was really the Sky Father.
Are atoms self aware?
Is Odin self aware?
Everyone knows it was really the Sky Father.
Are atoms self aware?
Is Odin self aware?
My question hurt you, I know.
