Evolution Scam 43,582

So they found a skull and they know it laid eggs and suckled its young. Great example of how evolutionists work. They take their fictional story, impose it on the evidence, and make up another fairy tale claim that they have some sort of transitional form.

Discovery of 'reptilian-mammal' fossil could rewrite history

They've deluded themselves into believing they can make up whatever they want these days.

And what's this rubbish? ...

“For a long time, we thought early mammals from the Cretaceous (145 to 66 million years ago) were anatomically similar and not ecologically diverse,” Huttenlocker said, in the statement. “This finding by our team and others reinforce that, even before the rise of modern mammals, ancient relatives of mammals were exploring specialty niches: insectivores, herbivores, carnivores, swimmers, gliders.”

lol now they're claiming that in the past these creatures were deliberately choosing what they wanted to be when they grew up??? Isn't that 'intelligent design', and by the creatures themselves? lol They're really desperate now.

Note they can still never produce any chain of evolution from one era to another.
 
So they found a skull and they know it laid eggs and suckled its young. Great example of how evolutionists work. They take their fictional story, impose it on the evidence, and make up another fairy tale claim that they have some sort of transitional form.

Discovery of 'reptilian-mammal' fossil could rewrite history

They've deluded themselves into believing they can make up whatever they want these days.

And what's this rubbish? ...

“For a long time, we thought early mammals from the Cretaceous (145 to 66 million years ago) were anatomically similar and not ecologically diverse,” Huttenlocker said, in the statement. “This finding by our team and others reinforce that, even before the rise of modern mammals, ancient relatives of mammals were exploring specialty niches: insectivores, herbivores, carnivores, swimmers, gliders.”

lol now they're claiming that in the past these creatures were deliberately choosing what they wanted to be when they grew up??? Isn't that 'intelligent design', and by the creatures themselves? lol They're really desperate now.

Note they can still never produce any chain of evolution from one era to another.
It's the effort to gain headlines with outlandish claims in the hopes more funding pours in.
 
So they found a skull and they know it laid eggs and suckled its young. Great example of how evolutionists work. They take their fictional story, impose it on the evidence, and make up another fairy tale claim that they have some sort of transitional form.

Discovery of 'reptilian-mammal' fossil could rewrite history

They've deluded themselves into believing they can make up whatever they want these days.

And what's this rubbish? ...

“For a long time, we thought early mammals from the Cretaceous (145 to 66 million years ago) were anatomically similar and not ecologically diverse,” Huttenlocker said, in the statement. “This finding by our team and others reinforce that, even before the rise of modern mammals, ancient relatives of mammals were exploring specialty niches: insectivores, herbivores, carnivores, swimmers, gliders.”

lol now they're claiming that in the past these creatures were deliberately choosing what they wanted to be when they grew up??? Isn't that 'intelligent design', and by the creatures themselves? lol They're really desperate now.

Note they can still never produce any chain of evolution from one era to another.
It's the effort to gain headlines with outlandish claims in the hopes more funding pours in.

But but gee, 'rationalists' and 'scientists' never lie n stuff, right?
 
So they found a skull and they know it laid eggs and suckled its young. Great example of how evolutionists work. They take their fictional story, impose it on the evidence, and make up another fairy tale claim that they have some sort of transitional form.

Discovery of 'reptilian-mammal' fossil could rewrite history
^ has absolutely zero understanding of the science that goes into his own topic
Please edjewmicate is on how you can tell a creature laid eggs and suckled it’s young by looking at a partial skull fragment.

I’ll wait here while you draw a creative story for us.
 
So they found a skull and they know it laid eggs and suckled its young. Great example of how evolutionists work. They take their fictional story, impose it on the evidence, and make up another fairy tale claim that they have some sort of transitional form.

Discovery of 'reptilian-mammal' fossil could rewrite history
^ has absolutely zero understanding of the science that goes into his own topic
Please edjewmicate is on how you can tell a creature laid eggs and suckled it’s young by looking at a partial skull fragment.

I’ll wait here while you draw a creative story for us.
Because they can tell its relationship to other fossils that have been discovered, and can estimate the nature of the species using the information they have.. It’s much harder than an internet turd looking at a picture saying it’s a lie because he’s completely ignorant of the topic.
 
So they found a skull and they know it laid eggs and suckled its young. Great example of how evolutionists work. They take their fictional story, impose it on the evidence, and make up another fairy tale claim that they have some sort of transitional form.

Discovery of 'reptilian-mammal' fossil could rewrite history

They've deluded themselves into believing they can make up whatever they want these days.

And what's this rubbish? ...

“For a long time, we thought early mammals from the Cretaceous (145 to 66 million years ago) were anatomically similar and not ecologically diverse,” Huttenlocker said, in the statement. “This finding by our team and others reinforce that, even before the rise of modern mammals, ancient relatives of mammals were exploring specialty niches: insectivores, herbivores, carnivores, swimmers, gliders.”

lol now they're claiming that in the past these creatures were deliberately choosing what they wanted to be when they grew up??? Isn't that 'intelligent design', and by the creatures themselves? lol They're really desperate now.

Note they can still never produce any chain of evolution from one era to another.

As opposed to deluding themselves that a book of fairy tales explains life on earth.
 
So they found a skull and they know it laid eggs and suckled its young. Great example of how evolutionists work. They take their fictional story, impose it on the evidence, and make up another fairy tale claim that they have some sort of transitional form.

Discovery of 'reptilian-mammal' fossil could rewrite history

They've deluded themselves into believing they can make up whatever they want these days.

And what's this rubbish? ...

“For a long time, we thought early mammals from the Cretaceous (145 to 66 million years ago) were anatomically similar and not ecologically diverse,” Huttenlocker said, in the statement. “This finding by our team and others reinforce that, even before the rise of modern mammals, ancient relatives of mammals were exploring specialty niches: insectivores, herbivores, carnivores, swimmers, gliders.”

lol now they're claiming that in the past these creatures were deliberately choosing what they wanted to be when they grew up??? Isn't that 'intelligent design', and by the creatures themselves? lol They're really desperate now.

Note they can still never produce any chain of evolution from one era to another.
It's the effort to gain headlines with outlandish claims in the hopes more funding pours in.

Does that explain all of your threads of headlines with outlandish claims?
 
So they found a skull and they know it laid eggs and suckled its young. Great example of how evolutionists work. They take their fictional story, impose it on the evidence, and make up another fairy tale claim that they have some sort of transitional form.

Discovery of 'reptilian-mammal' fossil could rewrite history
^ has absolutely zero understanding of the science that goes into his own topic
Please edjewmicate is on how you can tell a creature laid eggs and suckled it’s young by looking at a partial skull fragment.

I’ll wait here while you draw a creative story for us.
Because they can tell its relationship to other fossils that have been discovered, and can estimate the nature of the species using the information they have.. It’s much harder than an internet turd looking at a picture saying it’s a lie because he’s completely ignorant of the topic.
Amazing how some will believe fiction if it fits their brainwashing.
 
A skull is one of the most important parts of a carcus when determining information about it.
It can tell you if it was a herbivore, omnivore, mammal, reptile, predator or prey etc
 
So they found a skull and they know it laid eggs and suckled its young. Great example of how evolutionists work. They take their fictional story, impose it on the evidence, and make up another fairy tale claim that they have some sort of transitional form.

Discovery of 'reptilian-mammal' fossil could rewrite history

So Wheatherboy- what theory has more evidence explaining the diversity of life on earth- than the theory of evolution?
The diversity of life is a baffling issue for evolutionists. Didn’t know that, did you?
 
A skull is one of the most important parts of a carcus when determining information about it.
It can tell you if it was a herbivore, omnivore, mammal, reptile, predator or prey etc
Yeah, it can tell you predator or pray, carnivores or herbivores but it can’t say it laid eggs and had tits.
 
So they found a skull and they know it laid eggs and suckled its young. Great example of how evolutionists work. They take their fictional story, impose it on the evidence, and make up another fairy tale claim that they have some sort of transitional form.

Discovery of 'reptilian-mammal' fossil could rewrite history

They've deluded themselves into believing they can make up whatever they want these days.

And what's this rubbish? ...

“For a long time, we thought early mammals from the Cretaceous (145 to 66 million years ago) were anatomically similar and not ecologically diverse,” Huttenlocker said, in the statement. “This finding by our team and others reinforce that, even before the rise of modern mammals, ancient relatives of mammals were exploring specialty niches: insectivores, herbivores, carnivores, swimmers, gliders.”

lol now they're claiming that in the past these creatures were deliberately choosing what they wanted to be when they grew up??? Isn't that 'intelligent design', and by the creatures themselves? lol They're really desperate now..

No- you are just lying about what they said.
This finding by our team and others reinforce that, even before the rise of modern mammals, ancient relatives of mammals were exploring specialty niches: insectivores, herbivores, carnivores, swimmers, gliders.

Nothing about intelligent design or that the creatures were making a conscious decision to be an insectivore.

No- you are just lying about what they said.
This finding by our team and others reinforce that, even before the rise of modern mammals, ancient relatives of mammals were exploring specialty niches: insectivores, herbivores, carnivores, swimmers, gliders.

Nothing about intelligent design or that the creatures were making a conscious decision to be an insectivore
 
Last edited:
So they found a skull and they know it laid eggs and suckled its young. Great example of how evolutionists work. They take their fictional story, impose it on the evidence, and make up another fairy tale claim that they have some sort of transitional form.

Discovery of 'reptilian-mammal' fossil could rewrite history

So Wheatherboy- what theory has more evidence explaining the diversity of life on earth- than the theory of evolution?
The diversity of life is a baffling issue for evolutionists. Didn’t know that, did you?
So Wheatherboy- what theory has more evidence explaining the diversity of life on earth- than the theory of evolution?
 
A skull is one of the most important parts of a carcus when determining information about it.
It can tell you if it was a herbivore, omnivore, mammal, reptile, predator or prey etc
Yeah, it can tell you predator or pray, carnivores or herbivores but it can’t say it laid eggs and had tits.
They know if it was a mammal or not. They can tell if it was a reptile or bird.
 
A skull is one of the most important parts of a carcus when determining information about it.
It can tell you if it was a herbivore, omnivore, mammal, reptile, predator or prey etc
Yeah, it can tell you predator or pray, carnivores or herbivores but it can’t say it laid eggs and had tits.
They know if it was a mammal or not. They can tell if it was a reptile or bird.
“They” can say anything and because they have a white lab coat some go along without thinking.
 

Forum List

Back
Top