rtwngAvngr
Senior Member
- Jan 5, 2004
- 15,755
- 513
- 48
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #41
Originally posted by NewGuy
You just don't like my absolute rigid moral stance.
turnabout IS fair play!
I just don't see a constitutional crisis in any of this.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Originally posted by NewGuy
You just don't like my absolute rigid moral stance.
Originally posted by NewGuy
Which is better?
Winning when you are wrong?
or
Taking a chance you COULD win and be right?
Originally posted by rtwngAvngr
turnabout IS fair play!
I just don't see a constitutional crisis in any of this.
Originally posted by Zhukov
There is no chance.
Work within a viable party to achieve your goals. That is the logical choice.
Originally posted by rtwngAvngr
Yes. The whole thing is broken. You're going to choose the moment when we're in war and at risk to fix the whole system? Absurd. More of your appeal to apathy. There is no fate. THE U.S. is the wild card they left out. It's not over, til it's over. Acceptance? fuck that.
Originally posted by NewGuy
There is always chance when there is a choice. You kow this. It is logical.
You didn't answer the question.
Originally posted by NewGuy
If only we could rally your spirit into a direction of direct action, we would have something.
Originally posted by rtwngAvngr
Originally posted by Mustafa
The most incomprehensible thing about the universe is that it is comprehensible.
All paths in the Quantum Mechanics world of uncertainty lead back to an ultimate fate. It is just the many ways that uncertainty can take to get there.
Originally posted by rtwngAvngr
Please provide a link to proofs for fate.
Originally posted by ajwps
Uncertainty Principle and Fate
http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cach...s2002623/ms2002623.pdf+fate+uncertainty&hl=en
Originally posted by rtwngAvngr
This is about mathematical techniques for reducing uncertainty in physical system. This doesn't PROVE fate, in the way we're talking about.
Originally posted by NewGuy
He is notorious for derailing things when having no proof.
Originally posted by rtwngAvngr
Some people.
Originally posted by ajwps
Unless you are a physicist, you have no way of knowing anything about this post.
It is always nice to deny that which you don't understand or wish that fate or causality has to be proved to exist.
Originally posted by ajwps
Unless you are a physicist, you have no way of knowing anything about this post.
It is always nice to deny that which you don't understand or wish that fate or causality has to be proved to exist.