I did explain it. The shooters did it for their own good or what they perceived was their good.Can't do better than the truth. People do not do evil for the sake of evil.It pleases them to do that. People do things that please them for their own good.First of all evil is not extant. It doesn't exist in and of itself. Evil is the absence of good.
So men do not do "evil" for evil's sake. The do evil for the sake of their own good.
Then they rationalize that what they did was not "evil."
Been going on for thousands of years.
"...men do not do "evil" for evil's sake. The do evil for the sake of their own good."
Show me.
a. "Las Vegas shooting motive eludes investigators as new details emerge about gunman Stephen Paddock"
Las Vegas shooting motive eludes investigators as new details emerge about gunman Stephen Paddock
b. "Texas Church Shooting: More Than Two Dozen Parishioners Killed Federal officials said the motive for the shooting was unclear. " More than two dozen parishioners killed in rural Texas church shooting
You can do better than this......I hope.
This:
a. "Las Vegas shooting motive eludes investigators as new details emerge about gunman Stephen Paddock"
Las Vegas shooting motive eludes investigators as new details emerge about gunman Stephen Paddock
And this:
b. "Texas Church Shooting: More Than Two Dozen Parishioners Killed Federal officials said the motive for the shooting was unclear. " More than two dozen parishioners killed in rural Texas church shooting
....provide no benefit to either individual.
But, do, to the Prince of Darkness.
"Therefore do not let sin reign in your mortal body so that you obey its evil desires."
Romans 6:12
"its" may be "his"
Since you were unable to explain the two examples I provided, and they run counter to the cliches you propounded, you certainly won't be able to deal with post # 55.
Seems I'll just have to await a more astute observer of the human condition.