Evangelical activists want LGBT people excluded from anti-lynching bill

[mdk]

The law does not concern itself with what a sex obsessed bigot considers perverted. The issue is what people are allowed to do, or not do based on whether or not there is a compelling government interest-or a least a rational basis for prohibiting it.

The rational basis for prohibiting gay marriage is at least twofold. 1. Because polygamists & incest couples still can’t marry: and the 14th doesn’t exclude or create arbitrarily abbreviated list of deviant sex behaviors & 2. Childrens’ benefit from marriage contracts has always been both vital (nonsubstitutable) mother & father. And that Obergefell painted their benefits of a marriage contract of primary concern. And that Obergefell not only did not invite separate representation of children to arguments, the Court went out of its way to deny inclusion of amicus briefs from adult children raised in these experimental fatherless/motherless homes because their briefs did not shine favorably on gay marriage.

No doubt Ginsburg had plenty to do with that last fact because she’s already announced to the press weeks before the Hearing that she believed America was ready for gay marriage. In other words she’d already decided on her own to overrule state powers avered 56 times in Windsor 2013 & declare like a monarch that her opinion was already the law of the land. Children weighing in to the contrary would’ve detracted from her/their goal. So the amicus briefs (the voices of kids) that detracted from that bias could not be allowed as part of proceedings. That fact is also rational means for denying gay marriage. Obergefell was illegally ruled upon.

You’re ever so concerned about children not having a father in their home and yet neither does your own household. Perhaps your time would be better spent worrying about your own fatherless home instead crafting silly conspiracies and lying about gays on the internet. That’s the problem with you busybodies, you’re so quick to look into the windows of your neighbors, but get all pissy and defensive when it’s visited upon you. Get a life and a husband.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

The law does not concern itself with what a sex obsessed bigot considers perverted. The issue is what people are allowed to do, or not do based on whether or not there is a compelling government interest-or a least a rational basis for prohibiting it.

The rational basis for prohibiting gay marriage is at least twofold. 1. Because polygamists & incest couples still can’t marry: and the 14th doesn’t exclude or create arbitrarily abbreviated list of deviant sex behaviors & 2. Childrens’ benefit from marriage contracts has always been both vital (nonsubstitutable) mother & father. And that Obergefell painted their benefits of a marriage contract of primary concern. And that Obergefell not only did not invite separate representation of children to arguments, the Court went out of its way to deny inclusion of amicus briefs from adult children raised in these experimental fatherless/motherless homes because their briefs did not shine favorably on gay marriage.

No doubt Ginsburg had plenty to do with that last fact because she’s already announced to the press weeks before the Hearing that she believed America was ready for gay marriage. In other words she’d already decided on her own to overrule state powers avered 56 times in Windsor 2013 & declare like a monarch that her opinion was already the law of the land. Children weighing in to the contrary would’ve detracted from her/their goal. So the amicus briefs (the voices of kids) that detracted from that bias could not be allowed as part of proceedings. That fact is also rational means for denying gay marriage. Obergefell was illegally ruled upon.

Same debunked hogwash, different day. Let me ask you something. Given the fact that there are still a fair number of living hysterical loons like you out there , how is it that no body- in the years since Obergefell- has brought a new case based on these bizarre legal theories to try to overturn it?

Following the Constitution is not a bizarre legal theory.

 

[Silhouette]

So personal attacks on posters are a go to for a losing argument? When the Court rules on this stuff, we will see who is laughing then. I assure you that you are wrong about my personal life. But I’m not wrong about where this new Court is going to come down on the various Rulings re: lgbt & the 14th heading their way.

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

Evangelical activists want LGBT people excluded from anti-lynching bill

Evangelical activists are pressing Republican lawmakers to strip protections for LGBT+ people from an anti-lynching bill.

The Justice for Victims of Lynching Act cleared the US Senate on December 20 in a rare unanimous vote.
The bill would allow lynchings—bias-motivated mob killings without legal authority—to be charged as a federal hate crime for the first time.

However, evangelical law firm Liberty Counsel is upset because a portion of the bill includes protections for LGBT people as well as ethnic minorities.

Just when you think they cant sink any further. How do these freaks get to call themselves Christian ?

Redundant bullshit.

 

[bodecea]

Shouldn't it be against the law to lynch anyone, not just protected groups/classes?

Included federal charges.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

So personal attacks on posters are a go to for a losing argument? When the Court rules on this stuff, we will see who is laughing then. I assure you that you are wrong about my personal life. But I’m not wrong about where this new Court is going to come down on the various Rulings re: lgbt & the 14th heading their way.

 

[bodecea]

So personal attacks on posters are a go to for a losing argument? When the Court rules on this stuff, we will see who is laughing then. I assure you that you are wrong about my personal life. But I’m not wrong about where this new Court is going to come down on the various Rulings re: lgbt & the 14th heading their way.

How's that ruling going for you?

 

[Yarddog]

Evangelical activists want LGBT people excluded from anti-lynching bill

Evangelical activists are pressing Republican lawmakers to strip protections for LGBT+ people from an anti-lynching bill.

The Justice for Victims of Lynching Act cleared the US Senate on December 20 in a rare unanimous vote.
The bill would allow lynchings—bias-motivated mob killings without legal authority—to be charged as a federal hate crime for the first time.

However, evangelical law firm Liberty Counsel is upset because a portion of the bill includes protections for LGBT people as well as ethnic minorities.

Just when you think they cant sink any further. How do these freaks get to call themselves Christian ?

Where are these lynchings taking place? I would think there would be marches in the street.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Evangelical activists want LGBT people excluded from anti-lynching bill

Evangelical activists are pressing Republican lawmakers to strip protections for LGBT+ people from an anti-lynching bill.

The Justice for Victims of Lynching Act cleared the US Senate on December 20 in a rare unanimous vote.
The bill would allow lynchings—bias-motivated mob killings without legal authority—to be charged as a federal hate crime for the first time.

However, evangelical law firm Liberty Counsel is upset because a portion of the bill includes protections for LGBT people as well as ethnic minorities.

Just when you think they cant sink any further. How do these freaks get to call themselves Christian ?

Where are these lynchings taking place? I would think there would be marches in the street.

Since you asked Bubba

Hate Crimes and Violence Against LGBTQ People | Human Rights Campaign

 

[mdk]

So personal attacks on posters are a go to for a losing argument? When the Court rules on this stuff, we will see who is laughing then. I assure you that you are wrong about my personal life. But I’m not wrong about where this new Court is going to come down on the various Rulings re: lgbt & the 14th heading their way.

I know, right? Doesn’t it just suck when you’re held the very same standards you set for others? You busybodies always get so cranky when the spotlight you shine on others gets pointed in your direction.

 

[Yarddog]

Evangelical activists want LGBT people excluded from anti-lynching bill

Evangelical activists are pressing Republican lawmakers to strip protections for LGBT+ people from an anti-lynching bill.

The Justice for Victims of Lynching Act cleared the US Senate on December 20 in a rare unanimous vote.
The bill would allow lynchings—bias-motivated mob killings without legal authority—to be charged as a federal hate crime for the first time.

However, evangelical law firm Liberty Counsel is upset because a portion of the bill includes protections for LGBT people as well as ethnic minorities.

Just when you think they cant sink any further. How do these freaks get to call themselves Christian ?

Where are these lynchings taking place? I would think there would be marches in the street.

Since you asked Bubba

Hate Crimes and Violence Against LGBTQ People | Human Rights Campaign

I was asking Tommy for something specific. I hadn't heard about these new hangings. they didn't make the news?

 

[Lysistrata]

Evangelical activists want LGBT people excluded from anti-lynching bill

Evangelical activists are pressing Republican lawmakers to strip protections for LGBT+ people from an anti-lynching bill.

The Justice for Victims of Lynching Act cleared the US Senate on December 20 in a rare unanimous vote.
The bill would allow lynchings—bias-motivated mob killings without legal authority—to be charged as a federal hate crime for the first time.

However, evangelical law firm Liberty Counsel is upset because a portion of the bill includes protections for LGBT people as well as ethnic minorities.

Just when you think they cant sink any further. How do these freaks get to call themselves Christian ?

They call themselves Christian. They are not Christian. They are freaks out to trash people and nations.

 

[JoeMoma]

Shouldn't it be against the law to lynch anyone, not just protected groups/classes?

Included federal charges.

Only if not covered at the state level. Murder is already illegal.

 

[bodecea]

We could even use hemp rope, just to calm down the libs that we lynch.

And here we have those threats of physical violence we get from the Right on this message board.

 

[bodecea]

Liberals would be against lynching Jeffery Dahlmer?

Why would YOU be afraid of a trial for the likes of J. Dahlmer?

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Evangelical activists want LGBT people excluded from anti-lynching bill

Evangelical activists are pressing Republican lawmakers to strip protections for LGBT+ people from an anti-lynching bill.

The Justice for Victims of Lynching Act cleared the US Senate on December 20 in a rare unanimous vote.
The bill would allow lynchings—bias-motivated mob killings without legal authority—to be charged as a federal hate crime for the first time.

However, evangelical law firm Liberty Counsel is upset because a portion of the bill includes protections for LGBT people as well as ethnic minorities.

Just when you think they cant sink any further. How do these freaks get to call themselves Christian ?

Redundant bullshit.

And yet another rightist dullard misses the point.

 

[Rustic]

Evangelical activists want LGBT people excluded from anti-lynching bill

Evangelical activists are pressing Republican lawmakers to strip protections for LGBT+ people from an anti-lynching bill.

The Justice for Victims of Lynching Act cleared the US Senate on December 20 in a rare unanimous vote.
The bill would allow lynchings—bias-motivated mob killings without legal authority—to be charged as a federal hate crime for the first time.

However, evangelical law firm Liberty Counsel is upset because a portion of the bill includes protections for LGBT people as well as ethnic minorities.

Just when you think they cant sink any further. How do these freaks get to call themselves Christian ?

Redundant bullshit.

And yet another rightist dullard misses the point.

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

Evangelical activists want LGBT people excluded from anti-lynching bill

Evangelical activists are pressing Republican lawmakers to strip protections for LGBT+ people from an anti-lynching bill.

The Justice for Victims of Lynching Act cleared the US Senate on December 20 in a rare unanimous vote.
The bill would allow lynchings—bias-motivated mob killings without legal authority—to be charged as a federal hate crime for the first time.

However, evangelical law firm Liberty Counsel is upset because a portion of the bill includes protections for LGBT people as well as ethnic minorities.

Just when you think they cant sink any further. How do these freaks get to call themselves Christian ?

Redundant bullshit.

And yet another rightist dullard misses the point.

Right so we need more laws that make something that is already illegal .... more illegal ? It hasn't been legal to lynch someone since the time when the KKK was the Democratic Parties militant arm.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Evangelical activists want LGBT people excluded from anti-lynching bill

Evangelical activists are pressing Republican lawmakers to strip protections for LGBT+ people from an anti-lynching bill.

The Justice for Victims of Lynching Act cleared the US Senate on December 20 in a rare unanimous vote.
The bill would allow lynchings—bias-motivated mob killings without legal authority—to be charged as a federal hate crime for the first time.

However, evangelical law firm Liberty Counsel is upset because a portion of the bill includes protections for LGBT people as well as ethnic minorities.

Just when you think they cant sink any further. How do these freaks get to call themselves Christian ?

Redundant bullshit.

And yet another rightist dullard misses the point.

Right so we need more laws that make something that is already illegal .... more illegal ? It hasn't been legal to lynch someone since the time when the KKK was the Democratic Parties militant arm.

Obviously your politicians think so.
But you are missing the point in epic fashion. Wether its good or bad law is not material. The issue is that these fake Christians want to exclude Gays from its protection. that is sick.

 

[deanrd]

Let's post what we know:

Republicans applauded when a baker refused to serve a gay customer.

Republican preachers post sermons on Youtube calling for death to gays.

Republicans don't believe gays should have the same rights as hetros.

Republicans on the USMB use gay slurs.

And yet, many Republicans insist the GOP is not the homophobe party.

If it walks like a duck, talks like a duck...........then...........

The real story is this, Dean. Homosexuals aren't discriminated against at all. They have been recently granted Special Rights,including the new social institution of Gay Marriage.

As far as businesses "discriminating" against homosexuals, its impossible. Homosexuals look the same as anyone else. If someone is walking down the street, or comes into a store, there is no way to know they are taking it up the ass unless they tell you. The problem is that a lot of homosexuals somehow feel compelled to tell others about it. Truthfully, gays who tell people of their sexuality on a "need to know" basis only never have to fear being discriminated against.

When did marriage become a "special right"? If you are married and you appear in public together, we all assume that you are f*cking. Do you feel compelled to tell others about it? How do you do this. You have rings. We all know.Take the Duggars. With all of those kids, we know that they are f*cking. There is no "problem" with sex.

I'm not talking about marriage at all. Marriage is between a man and a broad. I'm talking about Gay Marriage, which is a new societal institution that no one ever heard of when I was a kid- a recent invention and a result of societal de-evolutiion.

A “broad”?