anotherlife
Gold Member
Most world leaders if not all, agree that all wars are about energy resources. But is this true? Let's challenge this deeply held dogmatic convention, that all politicians and political scientists believe.
For example, let's take Kaliningrad/Konigsberg. That place was continuously declining and emigrating to central Germany even before the Russians took it away. Also it has almost no resources. But yet most Germans would demand it back. Can this be explained by arguments for resources and energy?
For example, let's take Kaliningrad/Konigsberg. That place was continuously declining and emigrating to central Germany even before the Russians took it away. Also it has almost no resources. But yet most Germans would demand it back. Can this be explained by arguments for resources and energy?