- Banned
- #181
First off..there has been zero proof of any collusion with the White House. This more seems to be a result of Citizen's United, a profound example of Legislating from the Bench. Scalia and his conservative block ruled in favor of reversing 100 years of legislation geared to remove the corrupting influence of wealth on the political process.
Second..these PACs have been breaking the law since the 1950s, when IRS rules were unmoored from the law. The law says that these groups must EXCLUSIVELY participate in social welfare projects and cannot become involved politically.
Third? The targeting of the NAACP and Charlie Rangel by the IRS had more overtones of political payback then the "targeting" of tea party groups. Which, like liberal groups, were 'targeted' because their names seemed political. All of these groups got their status, which was illegal.
[MENTION=25283]Sallow[/MENTION]
Meaning since YOU think they are breaking the law it would be ok IF it were found that Obama WAS involved in this, right?
[MENTION=40954]Antares[/MENTION]
Sorry but what?
It's already been established that the Tea Party groups were breaking the law.
IRC 501(c)(4) provides for exemption from federal income tax of civic leagues or organizations not organized for profit but operated exclusively for the promotion of social welfare
http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-tege/eotopicm95.pdf
That's the federal law.
What do you suppose the penalty should be?
[MENTION=25283]Sallow[/MENTION]
you posted the Law and stated the they were breaking it, you didn't "prove" anything.
Now, since you THINK you've PROVEN they were breaking the Law you'd cheer lead if Obama WAS directing this?