Hillary Who?
Elizabeth Warren or Bernie Sanders? Or both?
How about neither. Ones a socialist moron, the other is an unethical moron. They do have one thing in common though! I'll let you figure out what it is!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Hillary Who?
Elizabeth Warren or Bernie Sanders? Or both?
Oh you guys always want to run unopposed. Pick some better GOP candidates then you won't have to worry so much about ours.Hillary Who?
Elizabeth Warren or Bernie Sanders? Or both?
How about neither. Ones a socialist moron, the other is an unethical moron. They do have one thing in common though! I'll let you figure out what it is!
Maria Cantwell would be a fine choice. Been in the Senate for over a decade. Unlike her buddy Bernie, she is actually a member of the Democratic Party. And the right-wing propagandists can't use that tired "no executive experience" line.
The Senate does not confer executive experience. Executive experience means being in control of a large organization, with proven leadership, vision, and delegation skills. Longevity in Congress means you have become good at being a part of a group, not the above. It's the difference between being the CEO and being on the Board of Trustees.
What a choice between those two
One an avowed Socialist, the other a communist
as for Hillary, she's just a power hungry witch who rode her hubby's coattails into the positions she's ever held. She's done nothing outstanding but be a career politician
but If a nobody like Obama can elected it seems any NOBODY is good enough for you on the left
Oh you guys always want to run unopposed. Pick some better GOP candidates then you won't have to worry so much about ours.Hillary Who?
Elizabeth Warren or Bernie Sanders? Or both?
How about neither. Ones a socialist moron, the other is an unethical moron. They do have one thing in common though! I'll let you figure out what it is!
No man has a chance of getting the dnc nod.Hillary Who?
Elizabeth Warren or Bernie Sanders? Or both?
The next Pres will be whatever woman the dems pick.
calling us all racist worked for years, so calling us all sexist should work wonders.
nothing like creating hate and division to bring a country to ruins
Thats the ticket dems and libs--------------Warren/Sanders. Lets do it. Get some genuine libs on the ticket. Its what you want and believe to so have the courage to do it.
Warren/Sanders-----------2016 YEEEEE, HAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
She's a nut. She's a lunatic. She's certifiable.She's the female Obama: a pathological liar with a shady past, a hatred for American Freedom and free enterprise and a true believer in Marxism.
Sure thing franky. She (Warren) also tears the heads off of kittens and puppies and EATS THEM.
Oh god, the depths of depravity that Indian will go to is amazing isn't it?
Hope she's the next President. And I like puppies and kittens.
She's a nut. She's certifiable. Her "high cheekbones" should make her a laughing stock, and if she were a Republican, she'd have been shamed into resigning.
But she's a Progressive and in the post Obama world, she will be the Nutty Nominee in 16
So the Hard Right don't like her, So she is pissing off the right people... She ticks the right box there.
In short, she's perfect for the Dems in 2016
Sent from smartphone using my wits and Taptalk
Totally, fucking nuts
Im liking a Hillary vs Rand Paul right now.Thats the ticket dems and libs--------------Warren/Sanders. Lets do it. Get some genuine libs on the ticket. Its what you want and believe to so have the courage to do it.
Warren/Sanders-----------2016 YEEEEE, HAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Sanders vs. Ron Paul.
Inform America on both perspectives.
It's interesting that someone with your limited intellect would comment on the intellect of post Neanderthal Homo Sapiens.Its not beating Hillary that is the problem with Warren though. I don't think she can but I also think a lot of that has to do with the fact that most Democrats are well aware she will not win the general.Hillary has a good chance of winning if she runs, though it would be down to her connections and Democratic donors. She wouldn't win on popularity, but on the candidates opposing her being less popular.
If Warren runs she would be immediately popular among Democrats, and even score some donors. But up against Hillary, I am not sure she organize as effectively, unless she could get grassroots support to counter Hillary's corporate backers.
Its interesting to see the democrats dealing with what the republicans are much better known for - quacks that have a real chance in the primary without a wisp of a hope in the general.
It's interesting to see you trying to equate someone of Warren's intellect with quacks on the right.
The morons will never get it.Hillary Who?
Elizabeth Warren or Bernie Sanders? Or both?
How about neither. Ones a socialist moron, the other is an unethical moron. They do have one thing in common though! I'll let you figure out what it is!
Since neither of them are morons I guess Lefties don't get it. I have these fat cousins who call everyone else fat. Its like listening to some of you calling others morons.The morons will never get it.Hillary Who?
Elizabeth Warren or Bernie Sanders? Or both?
How about neither. Ones a socialist moron, the other is an unethical moron. They do have one thing in common though! I'll let you figure out what it is!
She's a nut. She's a lunatic. She's certifiable.She's the female Obama: a pathological liar with a shady past, a hatred for American Freedom and free enterprise and a true believer in Marxism.
Sure thing franky. She (Warren) also tears the heads off of kittens and puppies and EATS THEM.
Oh god, the depths of depravity that Indian will go to is amazing isn't it?
Hope she's the next President. And I like puppies and kittens.
She's a nut. She's certifiable. Her "high cheekbones" should make her a laughing stock, and if she were a Republican, she'd have been shamed into resigning.
But she's a Progressive and in the post Obama world, she will be the Nutty Nominee in 16
So the Hard Right don't like her, So she is pissing off the right people... She ticks the right box there.
In short, she's perfect for the Dems in 2016
Sent from smartphone using my wits and Taptalk
Seems there is no informative attacks on her except "high cheek bones" which consists of dozens of GOP political NEWBS saying she is crazy because of something her mother said.
Totally, fucking nuts
I'm curious why this makes her "Totally nuts".......
Not very much substance there. But I'll notate that you are attacking something that has nothing to do with politics at all.......maybe you can learn from that.
You did hear her say that "her grandma told her". It's 2014, I can rant off lot's of things my grandma told me that weren't facts.
Congradulations on trying to take your party back.I am stating that I will not cast a vote for Hillary Clinton no matter what maniac the republicans nominate. At this point I would rather have a government that despises my ideology than spend any more time trying to support another "third way" neo-con democrat that only plays lip service to the progressive movement that elected them.Really?If Hillary is nominated she will have to do without my vote in the presidential election. Tired of Neo-Cons masquerading as liberals.
Are you being honest here?
Assume that Bachmann is running. Are you really stating that you would not vote Warren in that instance?