Those wars are not religious wars and have nothing to do with Christianity. Now, if you are referring to a Christian war like the crusades then we can talk but I have a feeling that you are referring to more recent events. You can protest the wars (and I would agree with you on the case of Iraq) but there is no equivalent in them to the terrorists.It's odd to me that people can take such a moral stance against a muslim killing dozens of innocent people with a suicide bomb or many suicide bombers killing hundreds of innocent people and at the same cheer on wars done by mostly christians that kill hundreds of thousands of innocent people and trade embargos that kill hundreds of thousands of innocent people.
Of course the trade embargos are another matter altogether. I have a problem when people seem to think that refusing to sell an item to someone somehow equates to what you are eluding to. There is no requirement for me to supply anyone with anything and saying that the USA has some bullshit moral obligation to feed another country is crap. To put it another way - if you are not sending support over to the starving in Africa then YOU are the reason that I continue to see advertisements of children with bloated bellies for lack of food. Not supplying something to a populous is not indicative to murdering them. Granted, this is a bit more complex than that but it is the simple version.
Then again, I am not a Christian. So, my question still stands:All goes back to the grip religion has on people's brains.
"My religion and my God are right, theirs is wrong so the people who share my God are automatically right and those who don't are automatically wrong."
What percentage of suicide bombers are NOT Muslim?
All you stated here is a straw man anyway. The facts are as they are presented and the main point is still there. You cannot face the problem and come up with a solution when the only thing you are interested in is denying the problem exists.
Your question doesn't still stand, you've conveniently changed it to better fit your agenda since your original question was so stupid. "What percentage of people kill a certain way?" What a useless question. What percentage of hunters use rifles compared to bow and arrow? Would that matter?
I don't care about motivation, but I'll bet a lot of our american soldiers say their God looks kindly upon what they're doing or of course they wouldn't be doing it.
Many of the battles of World War 2 meant certain death to the people who were first to arrive. Should we equate the first soldiers on the beach in Normandy as suicidal terrorists because they thought what they were doing was right in God's eyes and they faced certain death? I'm not understanding why in your brain style of killing is the most important thing in which trumps the numbers. Would you rather I kill your cousin in a weird manner or kill your entire family if faced with the choice?