archangel said:then again maybe not....willis just sounded to bland...willard is more macho...don't ya think.....
Willard was the guy who trained RATS in the movie "Willard and the Rats"
!! LOL
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
archangel said:then again maybe not....willis just sounded to bland...willard is more macho...don't ya think.....
Bonnie said:Willard was the guy who trained RATS in the movie "Willard and the Rats"
!! LOL
archangel said:you never cease to amaze me...ya catch on fast! :cof:
Trigg said:In English as a second language they're teaching proper English, in the Ebonics class are they teaching the kids to speak properly?? Because if they arn't they are doing these kids more harm than good.
Speaking only Ebonics limits the kind of work a person can get, certainly in higher paying careers. I don't understand when black leaders embrace this kind of thing. You would think they'd find it insulting.
Bonnie said:I wonder what Bill Cosby would say to all this? Doubt he'd be pleased since he wants to see black children have the best chance possible to compete for high paying jobs. I don't think Ebonics is the way to achieve that, but when he speaks out he will be called racist not by other blacks, but by white elitists.
MissileMan said:I'm not so sure...he's been taking a lot of flack from the black community. They don't want to hear the truth that blacks aren't being held back by whitie, they are being held back by themselves.
hylandrdet said:The biggest problem with history is that nobody learns from it. Our american "english" was a result of slangs, from other cultures, mixed into our "Queen's English"...
So you must ask yourself... Why not have a little "black" in our language?
Just a simple question, I just need a simple answer?
hylandrdet said:The biggest problem with history is that nobody learns from it. Our american "english" was a result of slangs, from other cultures, mixed into our "Queen's English"...
So you must ask yourself... Why not have a little "black" in our language?
Just a simple question, I just need a simple answer?
nucular said:There is more than a little "black" in almost everybody's version of American English. Among other things Blacks invented blues, jazz and rock and roll, so any terms that have come out of that idiom are black.
I don't think anybody has a problem with that (although on this board, who knows?). The problem is that if someone can only speak slang and not speak standard English as well it is difficult for this person to find a job or attain an education in this country. Then it's probably hard to succeed or make money. So to allow or encourage someone to speak only slang does that person a disservice.
Would you like to try to get a mortgage from or study literature with someone who can only speak slang?
-=d=- said:I'd say Ebonics isn't even Slang. It's people being too lazy to ask "Who are you with?", so they say 'Who you Be with?"
It's pure laziness and worthlessness. I take that back - there IS some worth in Ebonics...it's fun. F'oh shizzle.
hylandrdet said:The biggest problem with history is that nobody learns from it. Our american "english" was a result of slangs, from other cultures, mixed into our "Queen's English"...
So you must ask yourself... Why not have a little "black" in our language?
Just a simple question, I just need a simple answer?
GotZoom said:Simple answer:
There is a big difference between language and slang and dialect.
Ebonics is dialect. Just as people from Alabama (southern)and Boston (Bostonian ?), etc....
What the people behind Ebonics want is equivilent to people from Boston or Alabama wanting to teach their "accent." Can you see your child coming home from school with a spelling test like this:
1. Ka - something you drive in.
2. Paak - something you play in.
1. Fixin - getting ready to do something
2. Klect - to gather something (money, etc) that belongs to you.