It's something "everybody knows" so it's no use harping on it. All they have to say is that they will support the eventual gop nominee. If they press then let them eat static....Easy-Peasy.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Gee, I don't remember "mean tweet" coming up in the impeachments, the lawsuits against his business practices, or any of the pending criminal cases. Too bad. I guess he will just have to face real laws. Hey, I got it. Maybe he can switch the conversation to Russian Collusion. Everybody knows there never has been a federal law about that. Uh, never mind, he couldn't even get Mueller to bite on that one, back when Mueller just kept focusing on crimes and putting his associated penalties of law by jury trial and confessions of his associates.Sure, Trump makes mean Tweets afterall, and he makes up insulting names for dems, so i can see why you would support a guy who was bribed by China over him.
How is that?When you said "Is that what your binary tribal programming told you?", YOU were denying that Biden is corrupt and senile.
You seem confused. Perhaps you need to start from the beginning to see how you ended up here.How is that?
You impeached him for being mean, not because he incited a riot, because he didnt, and not because he wanted to know more about Bidens corruption in Ukraine. Your sham impeachments over non crimes supports MY argument, not yours. Your sham indictments also support my agument.Gee, I don't remember "mean tweet" coming up in the impeachments, the lawsuits against his business practices, or any of the pending criminal cases. Too bad. I guess he will just have to face real laws. Hey, I got it. Maybe he can switch the conversation to Russian Collusion. Everybody knows there never has been a federal law about that. Uh, never mind, he couldn't even get Mueller to bite on that one, back when Mueller just kept focusing on crimes and putting his associated penalties of law by jury trial and confessions of his associates.
I didn't impeach him, but didn't mind it a bit. The only reason not convicted and removed was Republican majorities.You impeached him for being mean, not because he incited a riot, because he didnt, and not because he wanted to know more about Bidens corruption in Ukraine. Your sham impeachments over non crimes supports MY argument, not yours. Your sham indictments also support my agument.
I am quite certain it isn’t me who is confusedYou seem confused.
The question itself demonstrates leftwing bias by WPA Polling.You can't win when half of your voting pool is already against you. Nonetheless, I doubt this prevent Republican primary voters from continuing to nominate these extremists. In the end, it will cost them a lot of winnable races.
Fifty-percent of all voters said they’d be less likely to support a candidate who espouses Trump’s false 2020 claims, while 26 percent said they’d be more likely to support such a candidate.
Among independents, that number rises to 65 percent who say they’d be less likely and drops to 18 percent who would be more likely to support such a candidate.
And among voters who are undecided on a hypothetical 2024 matchup between Trump and President Biden, 64 percent said they’d be less likely to support such a candidate, while just 5 percent said they’d be more likely to.
Or the big truth.Not surprising. I couldn't vote for somebody that supported Donny's "big lie".
Yep....you want to believe a lie so badly.I am quite certain it isn’t me who is confused
To date, zero refutation of an obviously stolen election.
WPA Intelligence supposedly calls elections correctly 69% according to 538You can't win when half of your voting pool is already against you. Nonetheless, I doubt this prevent Republican primary voters from continuing to nominate these extremists. In the end, it will cost them a lot of winnable races.
Fifty-percent of all voters said they’d be less likely to support a candidate who espouses Trump’s false 2020 claims, while 26 percent said they’d be more likely to support such a candidate.
Among independents, that number rises to 65 percent who say they’d be less likely and drops to 18 percent who would be more likely to support such a candidate.
And among voters who are undecided on a hypothetical 2024 matchup between Trump and President Biden, 64 percent said they’d be less likely to support such a candidate, while just 5 percent said they’d be more likely to.
I think you drew a dissenter.How is that?
That's not exactly a stellar percentage.WPA Intelligence supposedly calls elections correctly 69% according to 538
Those Independent numbers don't surprise me at all. Ouch.
Pollster Ratings - WPA Intelligence
FiveThirtyEight’s pollster ratings are calculated by analyzing the historical accuracy and methodology of each firm’s polls.projects.fivethirtyeight.com
Keep on stealing elections.Keep on losing.
We know. You will throw your support behind the most corrupt politician in US history, who also happens to be senile as fuck.
Lame attempt to get us to vote for establishment candidates.
Now we're getting somewhere...
And then that leads to this:
WPA Intelligence
WPA Intelligence is a leading provider of survey research, predictive analytics and application-based data management technology.wpaintel.com
This a lot of layers here.
Pretty interesting stuff, though.