Down-Ballot Republicans Who Endorse Trump’s Election-Fraud Lie Expected to Face ‘Considerable Voter Backlash,’ Poll Finds

[1srelluc]

It's something "everybody knows" so it's no use harping on it. All they have to say is that they will support the eventual gop nominee. If they press then let them eat static....Easy-Peasy.

 

[White 6]

Sure, Trump makes mean Tweets afterall, and he makes up insulting names for dems, so i can see why you would support a guy who was bribed by China over him.

Gee, I don't remember "mean tweet" coming up in the impeachments, the lawsuits against his business practices, or any of the pending criminal cases. Too bad. I guess he will just have to face real laws. Hey, I got it. Maybe he can switch the conversation to Russian Collusion. Everybody knows there never has been a federal law about that. Uh, never mind, he couldn't even get Mueller to bite on that one, back when Mueller just kept focusing on crimes and putting his associated penalties of law by jury trial and confessions of his associates.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

When you said "Is that what your binary tribal programming told you?", YOU were denying that Biden is corrupt and senile.

How is that?

 

[Failzero]

Russia Russia Russia and a Phone call to the Ukrainian Leader ?

 

[Godboy]

How is that?

You seem confused. Perhaps you need to start from the beginning to see how you ended up here.

 

[Godboy]

Gee, I don't remember "mean tweet" coming up in the impeachments, the lawsuits against his business practices, or any of the pending criminal cases. Too bad. I guess he will just have to face real laws. Hey, I got it. Maybe he can switch the conversation to Russian Collusion. Everybody knows there never has been a federal law about that. Uh, never mind, he couldn't even get Mueller to bite on that one, back when Mueller just kept focusing on crimes and putting his associated penalties of law by jury trial and confessions of his associates.

You impeached him for being mean, not because he incited a riot, because he didnt, and not because he wanted to know more about Bidens corruption in Ukraine. Your sham impeachments over non crimes supports MY argument, not yours. Your sham indictments also support my agument.

 

[White 6]

You impeached him for being mean, not because he incited a riot, because he didnt, and not because he wanted to know more about Bidens corruption in Ukraine. Your sham impeachments over non crimes supports MY argument, not yours. Your sham indictments also support my agument.

I didn't impeach him, but didn't mind it a bit. The only reason not convicted and removed was Republican majorities.
I filed no indictments either, but certainly do not mind, as it sounds like they have a lot of proof. Trump never does well with proof. I suspect his if fkd, but I don't mind that either, but again, I didn't fk him. He fkd himself, yet you still worship. Go figure.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

You seem confused.

I am quite certain it isn’t me who is confused

 

[Mashmont]

You can't win when half of your voting pool is already against you. Nonetheless, I doubt this prevent Republican primary voters from continuing to nominate these extremists. In the end, it will cost them a lot of winnable races.

Fifty-percent of all voters said they’d be less likely to support a candidate who espouses Trump’s false 2020 claims, while 26 percent said they’d be more likely to support such a candidate.

Among independents, that number rises to 65 percent who say they’d be less likely and drops to 18 percent who would be more likely to support such a candidate.

And among voters who are undecided on a hypothetical 2024 matchup between Trump and President Biden, 64 percent said they’d be less likely to support such a candidate, while just 5 percent said they’d be more likely to.

MSN

The question itself demonstrates leftwing bias by WPA Polling.

To date, zero refutation of an obviously stolen election.

 

[mudwhistle]

Not surprising. I couldn't vote for somebody that supported Donny's "big lie".

Or the big truth.

We called it the big steal.

 

[mudwhistle]

I am quite certain it isn’t me who is confused

Yep....you want to believe a lie so badly.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

To date, zero refutation of an obviously stolen election.

Keep on losing.

 

[okfine]

You can't win when half of your voting pool is already against you. Nonetheless, I doubt this prevent Republican primary voters from continuing to nominate these extremists. In the end, it will cost them a lot of winnable races.

Fifty-percent of all voters said they’d be less likely to support a candidate who espouses Trump’s false 2020 claims, while 26 percent said they’d be more likely to support such a candidate.

Among independents, that number rises to 65 percent who say they’d be less likely and drops to 18 percent who would be more likely to support such a candidate.

And among voters who are undecided on a hypothetical 2024 matchup between Trump and President Biden, 64 percent said they’d be less likely to support such a candidate, while just 5 percent said they’d be more likely to.

MSN

WPA Intelligence supposedly calls elections correctly 69% according to 538

Those Independent numbers don't surprise me at all. Ouch.

Pollster Ratings - WPA Intelligence

FiveThirtyEight’s pollster ratings are calculated by analyzing the historical accuracy and methodology of each firm’s polls.

projects.fivethirtyeight.com

 

[okfine]

How is that?

I think you drew a dissenter.

 

[The Duke]

WPA Intelligence supposedly calls elections correctly 69% according to 538

Those Independent numbers don't surprise me at all. Ouch.

Pollster Ratings - WPA Intelligence

FiveThirtyEight’s pollster ratings are calculated by analyzing the historical accuracy and methodology of each firm’s polls.

projects.fivethirtyeight.com

That's not exactly a stellar percentage.

It's not bad, but not stellar either.

 

[mudwhistle]

Keep on losing.

Keep on stealing elections.

That's the only thing you people are any good at.

You suck at governing....you and the rest of you racist leftists.

 

[SavannahMann]

We know. You will throw your support behind the most corrupt politician in US history, who also happens to be senile as fuck.

 

[Seymour Flops]

The fact that half the country would support something and the other half oppose it reflects our split as a nation. The people that would not support a 2020 election skeptic would not support any Republican so that is meaningless.

If the stats about independents are correct, it still has little meanings unless a down ballot Republican is actively campaigning on the them of stolen election. Mostly that topic only comes up when “journalists” ask about it obsessively instead of the real issues that a candidate wants to talk about.

“Shawna, I’m campaigning to bring common sense back to our state’s out of control budget and reduce taxes for hard working people of my state.”

“Yeah, yeah. Who won the 2020 presidential election?”

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Lame attempt to get us to vote for establishment candidates.

By establishment you mean people who win?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Now we're getting somewhere...

https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/20230921_US_WPAi.pdf

And then that leads to this:

WPA Intelligence

WPA Intelligence is a leading provider of survey research, predictive analytics and application-based data management technology.

wpaintel.com

This a lot of layers here.

Pretty interesting stuff, though.

If the poll is biased, then use information from the poll to argue that.

Otherwise, this is all whiny nonsense.