Donald Trump now has an obvious path to a second term

[DJT for Life]

Irrelevant since it was still many months away. I could only imagine if Cheney got his daughter a multi-million dollar job in Ukraine without the credentials to actually do the job. I'm sure DumBama would have had ever federal agency looking under every rock there, and nothing but support from the leftists.

There is no law that says you have to wait till the primary season to attack an opponent. You just make shit up out of the blue. It is fascinating to watch.

Or is it possible he waited for a less corrupt administration before looking into it? Nah, that can't be. Since this impeachment is based on the Democrats ability to read minds, they know that's why Trump did it when he did.

Uh, no, this impeachment is based on Trump's own words, soliciting a foreign national to investigate a political rival.

He was/is looking into Ukranian corruption.

Now, please understand that the Dems are saying that the transcript shows they want him investigating a political rival for help in the next
election. He however says he wants investigation into the corruption of the 2016 election. Dems are saying it is a Quid Pro Quo. GOP is
saying the transcript is about corruption. The problem is...the Dems say the transcript doesn't mention the word corruption in it. Guess what?
It also doesn't mention a Quid Pro Quo in it either. The only fact witness has testified that the President wanted nothing. He wanted no
Quid Pro Quo. A 1st year law student could beat that argument.

The Dems are beat and they will be beaten badly.

LOLOL

That is not looking into Ukranian corruption. That was an event which took place nearly 4 years ago. If it was truly corruption Trymp was interested in squashing, he would have asked Zelensky to look into current matters of ongoing actual corruption.

The Dems will have to prove that with a witness or two. Right now they have NONE. I would suggest if you have the info you contact
the DNC headquarters...they need it.

 

[Faun]

Uh, no, this impeachment is based on Trump's own words, soliciting a foreign national to investigate a political rival.

Which words? “I don’t want a quid pro quo”?

These words....

"Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it... "​

That would be Trump looking into Bidens quid pro quo crime, dumbass.

Which Trump can't legally do by soliciting the aid of a foreign national.

Nonsense. We have a reciprocal agreement with Ukraine for such matters, and Biden is not protected from investigation by his candidacy for office.

That treaty requires our Attorney GenGene to make such requests to their Ministry of justice; not our president to their president. And it's to ask for assistance in ongoing investigations; which we didn't have.

And no one said Biden is immune from investigation. Only that Trump can't solicit foreign aid that helps his campaign since there's a law specifically prohibiting such actions. Anyone else not connected with Trump's campaign could have sought such an investigation.

 

[Faun]

There is no law that says you have to wait till the primary season to attack an opponent. You just make shit up out of the blue. It is fascinating to watch.

Or is it possible he waited for a less corrupt administration before looking into it? Nah, that can't be. Since this impeachment is based on the Democrats ability to read minds, they know that's why Trump did it when he did.

Uh, no, this impeachment is based on Trump's own words, soliciting a foreign national to investigate a political rival.

He was/is looking into Ukranian corruption.

Now, please understand that the Dems are saying that the transcript shows they want him investigating a political rival for help in the next
election. He however says he wants investigation into the corruption of the 2016 election. Dems are saying it is a Quid Pro Quo. GOP is
saying the transcript is about corruption. The problem is...the Dems say the transcript doesn't mention the word corruption in it. Guess what?
It also doesn't mention a Quid Pro Quo in it either. The only fact witness has testified that the President wanted nothing. He wanted no
Quid Pro Quo. A 1st year law student could beat that argument.

The Dems are beat and they will be beaten badly.

LOLOL

That is not looking into Ukranian corruption. That was an event which took place nearly 4 years ago. If it was truly corruption Trymp was interested in squashing, he would have asked Zelensky to look into current matters of ongoing actual corruption.

The Dems will have to prove that with a witness or two. Right now they have NONE. I would suggest if you have the info you contact
the DNC headquarters...they need it.

Here's the "witness testimony"...

https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Unclassified09.2019.pdf

 

[longknife]

Which words? “I don’t want a quid pro quo”?

These words....

"Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it... "​

That would be Trump looking into Bidens quid pro quo crime, dumbass.

Which Trump can't legally do by soliciting the aid of a foreign national.

Nonsense. We have a reciprocal agreement with Ukraine for such matters, and Biden is not protected from investigation by his candidacy for office.

That treaty requires our Attorney GenGene to make such requests to their Ministry of justice; not our president to their president. And it's to ask for assistance in ongoing investigations; which we didn't have.

And no one said Biden is immune from investigation. Only that Trump can't solicit foreign aid that helps his campaign since there's a law specifically prohibiting such actions. Anyone else not connected with Trump's campaign could have sought such an investigation.

Our AG answers to our president so why shouldn't the president be able to ask a question the AG would?

 

[longknife]

Or is it possible he waited for a less corrupt administration before looking into it? Nah, that can't be. Since this impeachment is based on the Democrats ability to read minds, they know that's why Trump did it when he did.

Uh, no, this impeachment is based on Trump's own words, soliciting a foreign national to investigate a political rival.

He was/is looking into Ukranian corruption.

Now, please understand that the Dems are saying that the transcript shows they want him investigating a political rival for help in the next
election. He however says he wants investigation into the corruption of the 2016 election. Dems are saying it is a Quid Pro Quo. GOP is
saying the transcript is about corruption. The problem is...the Dems say the transcript doesn't mention the word corruption in it. Guess what?
It also doesn't mention a Quid Pro Quo in it either. The only fact witness has testified that the President wanted nothing. He wanted no
Quid Pro Quo. A 1st year law student could beat that argument.

The Dems are beat and they will be beaten badly.

LOLOL

That is not looking into Ukranian corruption. That was an event which took place nearly 4 years ago. If it was truly corruption Trymp was interested in squashing, he would have asked Zelensky to look into current matters of ongoing actual corruption.

The Dems will have to prove that with a witness or two. Right now they have NONE. I would suggest if you have the info you contact
the DNC headquarters...they need it.

Here's the "witness testimony"...

https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Unclassified09.2019.pdf

I don't see the president asking the Ukrainian president for anything other than to investigate corruption. Not once did the president suggest or hint he had something in return if he did.

Your TDS is getting the best of you.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Which words? “I don’t want a quid pro quo”?

These words....

"Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it... "​

That would be Trump looking into Bidens quid pro quo crime, dumbass.

Which Trump can't legally do by soliciting the aid of a foreign national.

Nonsense. We have a reciprocal agreement with Ukraine for such matters, and Biden is not protected from investigation by his candidacy for office.

That treaty requires our Attorney GenGene to make such requests to their Ministry of justice; not our president to their president. And it's to ask for assistance in ongoing investigations; which we didn't have.

And no one said Biden is immune from investigation. Only that Trump can't solicit foreign aid that helps his campaign since there's a law specifically prohibiting such actions. Anyone else not connected with Trump's campaign could have sought such an investigation.

Trump is the Chief Law Enforcement Officer of the United States. He outranks the attorney, and can make the request.

The request was legitimate. The whine over the political status of Biden is humorous at best.

 

[DJT for Life]

Or is it possible he waited for a less corrupt administration before looking into it? Nah, that can't be. Since this impeachment is based on the Democrats ability to read minds, they know that's why Trump did it when he did.

Uh, no, this impeachment is based on Trump's own words, soliciting a foreign national to investigate a political rival.

He was/is looking into Ukranian corruption.

Now, please understand that the Dems are saying that the transcript shows they want him investigating a political rival for help in the next
election. He however says he wants investigation into the corruption of the 2016 election. Dems are saying it is a Quid Pro Quo. GOP is
saying the transcript is about corruption. The problem is...the Dems say the transcript doesn't mention the word corruption in it. Guess what?
It also doesn't mention a Quid Pro Quo in it either. The only fact witness has testified that the President wanted nothing. He wanted no
Quid Pro Quo. A 1st year law student could beat that argument.

The Dems are beat and they will be beaten badly.

LOLOL

That is not looking into Ukranian corruption. That was an event which took place nearly 4 years ago. If it was truly corruption Trymp was interested in squashing, he would have asked Zelensky to look into current matters of ongoing actual corruption.

The Dems will have to prove that with a witness or two. Right now they have NONE. I would suggest if you have the info you contact
the DNC headquarters...they need it.

Here's the "witness testimony"...

https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Unclassified09.2019.pdf

What the fuck is that?

Are you agreeing with me that there is no evidence of a quid pro quo?

 

[Faun]

These words....

"Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it... "​

That would be Trump looking into Bidens quid pro quo crime, dumbass.

Which Trump can't legally do by soliciting the aid of a foreign national.

Nonsense. We have a reciprocal agreement with Ukraine for such matters, and Biden is not protected from investigation by his candidacy for office.

That treaty requires our Attorney GenGene to make such requests to their Ministry of justice; not our president to their president. And it's to ask for assistance in ongoing investigations; which we didn't have.

And no one said Biden is immune from investigation. Only that Trump can't solicit foreign aid that helps his campaign since there's a law specifically prohibiting such actions. Anyone else not connected with Trump's campaign could have sought such an investigation.

Our AG answers to our president so why shouldn't the president be able to ask a question the AG would?

Take it up with the treaty.

 

[Faun]

Uh, no, this impeachment is based on Trump's own words, soliciting a foreign national to investigate a political rival.

He was/is looking into Ukranian corruption.

Now, please understand that the Dems are saying that the transcript shows they want him investigating a political rival for help in the next
election. He however says he wants investigation into the corruption of the 2016 election. Dems are saying it is a Quid Pro Quo. GOP is
saying the transcript is about corruption. The problem is...the Dems say the transcript doesn't mention the word corruption in it. Guess what?
It also doesn't mention a Quid Pro Quo in it either. The only fact witness has testified that the President wanted nothing. He wanted no
Quid Pro Quo. A 1st year law student could beat that argument.

The Dems are beat and they will be beaten badly.

LOLOL

That is not looking into Ukranian corruption. That was an event which took place nearly 4 years ago. If it was truly corruption Trymp was interested in squashing, he would have asked Zelensky to look into current matters of ongoing actual corruption.

The Dems will have to prove that with a witness or two. Right now they have NONE. I would suggest if you have the info you contact
the DNC headquarters...they need it.

Here's the "witness testimony"...

https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Unclassified09.2019.pdf

I don't see the president asking the Ukrainian president for anything other than to investigate corruption. Not once did the president suggest or hint he had something in return if he did.

Your TDS is getting the best of you.

Not my fault you don't see him asking a foreign national to investigate Biden.

 

[DJT for Life]

He was/is looking into Ukranian corruption.

Now, please understand that the Dems are saying that the transcript shows they want him investigating a political rival for help in the next
election. He however says he wants investigation into the corruption of the 2016 election. Dems are saying it is a Quid Pro Quo. GOP is
saying the transcript is about corruption. The problem is...the Dems say the transcript doesn't mention the word corruption in it. Guess what?
It also doesn't mention a Quid Pro Quo in it either. The only fact witness has testified that the President wanted nothing. He wanted no
Quid Pro Quo. A 1st year law student could beat that argument.

The Dems are beat and they will be beaten badly.

LOLOL

That is not looking into Ukranian corruption. That was an event which took place nearly 4 years ago. If it was truly corruption Trymp was interested in squashing, he would have asked Zelensky to look into current matters of ongoing actual corruption.

The Dems will have to prove that with a witness or two. Right now they have NONE. I would suggest if you have the info you contact
the DNC headquarters...they need it.

Here's the "witness testimony"...

https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Unclassified09.2019.pdf

I don't see the president asking the Ukrainian president for anything other than to investigate corruption. Not once did the president suggest or hint he had something in return if he did.

Your TDS is getting the best of you.

Not my fault you don't see him asking a foreign national to investigate Biden.

Yes for corruption in the Ukraine. Not for 2020.

 

[Faun]

These words....

"Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it... "​

That would be Trump looking into Bidens quid pro quo crime, dumbass.

Which Trump can't legally do by soliciting the aid of a foreign national.

Nonsense. We have a reciprocal agreement with Ukraine for such matters, and Biden is not protected from investigation by his candidacy for office.

That treaty requires our Attorney GenGene to make such requests to their Ministry of justice; not our president to their president. And it's to ask for assistance in ongoing investigations; which we didn't have.

And no one said Biden is immune from investigation. Only that Trump can't solicit foreign aid that helps his campaign since there's a law specifically prohibiting such actions. Anyone else not connected with Trump's campaign could have sought such an investigation.

Trump is the Chief Law Enforcement Officer of the United States. He outranks the attorney, and can make the request.

The request was legitimate. The whine over the political status of Biden is humorous at best.

It matters not that he out ranks the Attorney General, the treaty has provisions. Trump doesn't get to circumvent those provisions because he's the president. Nor does he get to break the law to do so.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

That would be Trump looking into Bidens quid pro quo crime, dumbass.

Which Trump can't legally do by soliciting the aid of a foreign national.

Nonsense. We have a reciprocal agreement with Ukraine for such matters, and Biden is not protected from investigation by his candidacy for office.

That treaty requires our Attorney GenGene to make such requests to their Ministry of justice; not our president to their president. And it's to ask for assistance in ongoing investigations; which we didn't have.

And no one said Biden is immune from investigation. Only that Trump can't solicit foreign aid that helps his campaign since there's a law specifically prohibiting such actions. Anyone else not connected with Trump's campaign could have sought such an investigation.

Trump is the Chief Law Enforcement Officer of the United States. He outranks the attorney, and can make the request.

The request was legitimate. The whine over the political status of Biden is humorous at best.

It matters not that he out ranks the Attorney General, the treaty has provisions. Trump doesn't get to circumvent those provisions because he's the president. Nor does he get to break the law to do so.

Post the pertinent provision barring Trump's request.

 

[Faun]

Uh, no, this impeachment is based on Trump's own words, soliciting a foreign national to investigate a political rival.

He was/is looking into Ukranian corruption.

Now, please understand that the Dems are saying that the transcript shows they want him investigating a political rival for help in the next
election. He however says he wants investigation into the corruption of the 2016 election. Dems are saying it is a Quid Pro Quo. GOP is
saying the transcript is about corruption. The problem is...the Dems say the transcript doesn't mention the word corruption in it. Guess what?
It also doesn't mention a Quid Pro Quo in it either. The only fact witness has testified that the President wanted nothing. He wanted no
Quid Pro Quo. A 1st year law student could beat that argument.

The Dems are beat and they will be beaten badly.

LOLOL

That is not looking into Ukranian corruption. That was an event which took place nearly 4 years ago. If it was truly corruption Trymp was interested in squashing, he would have asked Zelensky to look into current matters of ongoing actual corruption.

The Dems will have to prove that with a witness or two. Right now they have NONE. I would suggest if you have the info you contact
the DNC headquarters...they need it.

Here's the "witness testimony"...

https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Unclassified09.2019.pdf

What the fuck is that?

Are you agreeing with me that there is no evidence of a quid pro quo?

I said Trump solicited a foreign national to investigate a political rival. I didn't say Trump said quid pro quo. Is English not your first language?

 

[The Original Tree]

Shh Adolph Schiffler is listening.

 

[Faun]

LOLOL

That is not looking into Ukranian corruption. That was an event which took place nearly 4 years ago. If it was truly corruption Trymp was interested in squashing, he would have asked Zelensky to look into current matters of ongoing actual corruption.

The Dems will have to prove that with a witness or two. Right now they have NONE. I would suggest if you have the info you contact
the DNC headquarters...they need it.

Here's the "witness testimony"...

https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Unclassified09.2019.pdf

I don't see the president asking the Ukrainian president for anything other than to investigate corruption. Not once did the president suggest or hint he had something in return if he did.

Your TDS is getting the best of you.

Not my fault you don't see him asking a foreign national to investigate Biden.

Yes for corruption in the Ukraine. Not for 2020.

LOL

Corruption of a US VP who's no longer VP, whose son no longer works for Burisma, the company not actively being investigated by thevguy who's no longer their top prosecutor, who was fired by the guy who's no longer president.

So what corruption would they be investigating?

 

[Faun]

Which Trump can't legally do by soliciting the aid of a foreign national.

Nonsense. We have a reciprocal agreement with Ukraine for such matters, and Biden is not protected from investigation by his candidacy for office.

That treaty requires our Attorney GenGene to make such requests to their Ministry of justice; not our president to their president. And it's to ask for assistance in ongoing investigations; which we didn't have.

And no one said Biden is immune from investigation. Only that Trump can't solicit foreign aid that helps his campaign since there's a law specifically prohibiting such actions. Anyone else not connected with Trump's campaign could have sought such an investigation.

Trump is the Chief Law Enforcement Officer of the United States. He outranks the attorney, and can make the request.

The request was legitimate. The whine over the political status of Biden is humorous at best.

It matters not that he out ranks the Attorney General, the treaty has provisions. Trump doesn't get to circumvent those provisions because he's the president. Nor does he get to break the law to do so.

Post the pertinent provision barring Trump's request.

ARTICLE 1 SCOPE OF ASSISTANCE
1. The Contracting States shall provide mutual assistance, in accordance with the provisions of this Treaty, in connection with the investigation, prosecution, and prevention of offenses, and in proceedings related to criminal matters.

ARTICLE2 CENTRAL AUTHORITIES
1. Each Contracting State shall have a Central Authority to make and receive requests pursuant to this Treaty.
2. For the United States of America, the Central Authority shall be the Attorney General or a person designated by the Attorney General. For Ukraine, the Central Authority shall be the Ministry of Justice and the Office of the Prosecutor General.

ARTICLE4 FORM AND CONTENTS OF REQUESTS
1. A request for assistance shall be in writing except that the Central Authority of the Requested State may accept a request in another form in urgent situations. If the request is not in writing, it shall be confirmed in writing within ten days unless the Central Authority of the Requested State agrees otherwise. The request shall be in the language of the Requested State unless otherwise agreed.
2. The request shall include the following: (a) the name of the authority conducting the investigation, prosecution, or proceeding to which the request relates;

https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/12978-Ukraine-Law-Enforcement-MLAT-7.22.1998.pdf

 

[Preacher]

He has more than this, but this is enough. Even CNN is trying desperately to face reality.

Donald Trump now has an obvious path to a second term - CNNPolitics

I expect him to win a 2nd term even though I won't be voting for him. I am kind of worried about a 2nd term. He isn't face reelection after that and his anti gun sentiments might come out and flooding the country with MORE legal invaders....no thanks.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Nonsense. We have a reciprocal agreement with Ukraine for such matters, and Biden is not protected from investigation by his candidacy for office.

That treaty requires our Attorney GenGene to make such requests to their Ministry of justice; not our president to their president. And it's to ask for assistance in ongoing investigations; which we didn't have.

And no one said Biden is immune from investigation. Only that Trump can't solicit foreign aid that helps his campaign since there's a law specifically prohibiting such actions. Anyone else not connected with Trump's campaign could have sought such an investigation.

Trump is the Chief Law Enforcement Officer of the United States. He outranks the attorney, and can make the request.

The request was legitimate. The whine over the political status of Biden is humorous at best.

It matters not that he out ranks the Attorney General, the treaty has provisions. Trump doesn't get to circumvent those provisions because he's the president. Nor does he get to break the law to do so.

Post the pertinent provision barring Trump's request.

ARTICLE 1 SCOPE OF ASSISTANCE
1. The Contracting States shall provide mutual assistance, in accordance with the provisions of this Treaty, in connection with the investigation, prosecution, and prevention of offenses, and in proceedings related to criminal matters.

ARTICLE2 CENTRAL AUTHORITIES
1. Each Contracting State shall have a Central Authority to make and receive requests pursuant to this Treaty.
2. For the United States of America, the Central Authority shall be the Attorney General or a person designated by the Attorney General. For Ukraine, the Central Authority shall be the Ministry of Justice and the Office of the Prosecutor General.

ARTICLE4 FORM AND CONTENTS OF REQUESTS
1. A request for assistance shall be in writing except that the Central Authority of the Requested State may accept a request in another form in urgent situations. If the request is not in writing, it shall be confirmed in writing within ten days unless the Central Authority of the Requested State agrees otherwise. The request shall be in the language of the Requested State unless otherwise agreed.
2. The request shall include the following: (a) the name of the authority conducting the investigation, prosecution, or proceeding to which the request relates;

https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/12978-Ukraine-Law-Enforcement-MLAT-7.22.1998.pdf

Yes, a "central authority". That does not preclude the President from making such a request.

How fucking childish. "The rules say you must open your egg at the bottom, not at the top." You'd make a fine Soviet apparatchik.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

He has more than this, but this is enough. Even CNN is trying desperately to face reality.

Donald Trump now has an obvious path to a second term - CNNPolitics

I expect him to win a 2nd term even though I won't be voting for him. I am kind of worried about a 2nd term. He isn't face reelection after that and his anti gun sentiments might come out and flooding the country with MORE legal invaders....no thanks.

No evidence to indicate that.

 

[miketx]

If Biden wins the primary we are getting 4 more years of Trump. I believe Warren stands a chance.

A chance at what? Ruining what's left of the USA and bring civil war?