DOJ asked to investigate ID voter laws

[Truthmatters]

The Philly Plot to Block The Black Vote - Jack & Jill Politics



Listen to them talk about keeping the voter turnout down

Right out of their own mouths

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Motive should be irrelevant if the proposed law would actually prevent crime and fraud. Exceptions could be included to prevent the elderly from being unable to vote. There is NO REASON a younger person couldn't obtain an id at some point prior to election day. Stopping fraud should trump ideology

You are exactly right. Unfortunately, the democrat party benefits from this fraud so they will never work to stop it.

WHERE IS YOUR PROOF...
Lies are not going to going to pass the test anymore.


You have offered NOT ONE SHRED of proof of what you are claiming.

You missed my post about the assassin who registered to vote twice?
Try again?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

The Philly Plot to Block The Black Vote - Jack & Jill Politics



Listen to them talk about keeping the voter turnout down

Right out of their own mouths

How can they keep the legal black vote down?
Tell us with your own mouth.

 

[del]

you said mouths

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Why are you refusing to face these FACTS.


They are cold hard facts and you have given NOTHING to try and refute them

I'm not sure if your talking to me or not but ill respond anyhow.

Let me give you some COLD HARD FACTS:

Red wine is good for your heart.

Red wine can cause liver cancer

Exercise common sense when consuming red wine.


Why is it so hard to understand that everyone can claim FACTS for their position that may prove their point but when mixed with a little caution common sense can prevail.
I will concede that a lazy person may not get to vote if he was too lazy to get an id. But that was HIS CHOICE. As I stated exceptions to the rule could be included but all your interested in is holding your hard line position.

 

[Conservative]

New York Times/CBS News Poll: 2012 Republicans, Obama and the Economy - Document - NYTimes.com


Look on page 30 the second part of question 92


12% said they were prevented from voting

I must have missed the part of the piece where proof that Republicans or republican policies were at fault.

Or are you just assuming that part?

 

[Truthmatters]

It is proof people were kept from voting.

The poll doesnt go into why does it.

 

[Truthmatters]

Why are you refusing to face these FACTS.


They are cold hard facts and you have given NOTHING to try and refute them

I'm not sure if your talking to me or not but ill respond anyhow.

Let me give you some COLD HARD FACTS:

Red wine is good for your heart.

Red wine can cause liver cancer

Exercise common sense when consuming red wine.


Why is it so hard to understand that everyone can claim FACTS for their position that may prove their point but when mixed with a little caution common sense can prevail.
I will concede that a lazy person may not get to vote if he was too lazy to get an id. But that was HIS CHOICE. As I stated exceptions to the rule could be included but all your interested in is holding your hard line position.

So you just ignore the republicans saying they dont want everyone to vote in their own words ON TAPE????????????

 

[WillowTree]

It is proof people were kept from voting.

The poll doesnt go into why does it.

why do you want illegals to vote? what's in it for you?

 

[Truthmatters]

GOP Memo Admits Plan Could 'Keep Black Vote Down' - Los Angeles Times

 

[Conservative]

It is proof people were kept from voting.

The poll doesnt go into why does it.

No, it doesn't.

Let's try it this way...

Why do you 'think' those 12% were prevented from voting? What proof do you have for that belief?

Two fairly simple questions.

 

[Robert]

It is proof people were kept from voting.

The poll doesnt go into why does it.

Its "proof" that back in 1986 it "Could" Possibly effect voting LMAO!!! 1986???

 

[Conservative]

It is proof people were kept from voting.

The poll doesnt go into why does it.

Its "proof" that back in 1986 it "Could" Possibly effect voting LMAO!!! 1986???

The poll was from 2011. The other link was from 1986, and is essentially irrelevant. Unless of course Truthmatters can show articles like that every year since 1986. Then he might have a point.

 

[Robert]

It is proof people were kept from voting.

The poll doesnt go into why does it.

Its "proof" that back in 1986 it "Could" Possibly effect voting LMAO!!! 1986???

The poll was from 2011. The other link was from 1986, and is essentially irrelevant. Unless of course Truthmatters can show articles like that every year since 1986. Then he might have a point.

This shit just makes me laugh

 

[Conservative]

Its "proof" that back in 1986 it "Could" Possibly effect voting LMAO!!! 1986???

The poll was from 2011. The other link was from 1986, and is essentially irrelevant. Unless of course Truthmatters can show articles like that every year since 1986. Then he might have a point.

This shit just makes me laugh

I do not disagree


Also, I notice that as soon as I asked for his personal opinion on the reason for the 12% who said they were prevented from voting, and some facts to back it up, Truthmatters left the thread.


I'm new here... is that normal behavior?

 

[WillowTree]

The truth is she wants illegals to vote in the US of KKKA.

 

[martybegan]

The poll was from 2011. The other link was from 1986, and is essentially irrelevant. Unless of course Truthmatters can show articles like that every year since 1986. Then he might have a point.

This shit just makes me laugh

I do not disagree


Also, I notice that as soon as I asked for his personal opinion on the reason for the 12% who said they were prevented from voting, and some facts to back it up, Truthmatters left the thread.


I'm new here... is that normal behavior?

For truthmatters....yes. Truthmatters is basically a democratic party talking point generator, with added "Why do X's hate america" added in for fun.

 

[Momanohedhunter]

The poll was from 2011. The other link was from 1986, and is essentially irrelevant. Unless of course Truthmatters can show articles like that every year since 1986. Then he might have a point.

This shit just makes me laugh

I do not disagree


Also, I notice that as soon as I asked for his personal opinion on the reason for the 12% who said they were prevented from voting, and some facts to back it up, Truthmatters left the thread.


I'm new here... is that normal behavior?

yes. from both sides.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

New York Times/CBS News Poll: 2012 Republicans, Obama and the Economy - Document - NYTimes.com


Look on page 30 the second part of question 92


12% said they were prevented from voting

Maybe the high price of gas prevented them from voting?
Maybe heavy rain prevented them from voting?
Maybe a really bad hangover prevented them from voting?
Maybe the warden prevented them from voting, until their sentence was completed?

Without more information, that poll question is useless.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Why are you refusing to face these FACTS.


They are cold hard facts and you have given NOTHING to try and refute them

I'm not sure if your talking to me or not but ill respond anyhow.

Let me give you some COLD HARD FACTS:

Red wine is good for your heart.

Red wine can cause liver cancer

Exercise common sense when consuming red wine.


Why is it so hard to understand that everyone can claim FACTS for their position that may prove their point but when mixed with a little caution common sense can prevail.
I will concede that a lazy person may not get to vote if he was too lazy to get an id. But that was HIS CHOICE. As I stated exceptions to the rule could be included but all your interested in is holding your hard line position.

So you just ignore the republicans saying they dont want everyone to vote in their own words ON TAPE????????????

yes, I don't care what some political idiot said. I care about the protections the law would provide.