K
KLSuddeth
Guest
- Thread starter
- #61
insert - I like the way you think
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Originally posted by Insertalias
I think it would make me safer to have those 100,000 troops in the US?
Originally posted by Insertalias
By the by SoDam could have never lunched a succesfull atack on American soil, Japan and Germay could.
Originally posted by Insertalias
I think it would make me safer to have those 100,000 troops in the US?
If we are giving them water let us know. If they are going to school, hell ya tell me more.
Originally posted by Insertalias
:gross2: :gross2: :gross2:
is it cajones or is it alterior motives?
Originally posted by dilloduck
HEY FREE----I'm in Austin already-----lots of mud bugs here----79 cents a lb in season!!! No need to go any further east unless you just have a hankerin
Originally posted by Insertalias
It is not cheap oil for us right now it is cheaper oil for Haliburton Dick Cheney's old company, and the leading contender for contracts to build up oil infrastructure. Bush's arms building friends and his old buddies in haliburton wait for blank check after blank check of tax payers money to fall in their lap, as they are assured that we want to be paying the tab for their corporate Imperialization. There are tyrants persueing weapons of mass destruction all over the world, we just happened to liberate the people with a shit load of oil. Maybe Im crazy, or maybe there is something motivating bush besides "liberating" Iraqis. We knew that saddam had certian WMD's because we gave them to him to fight Iran a long time ago. If we went back rebuilding the countries we've supplied with WMDs over the years the US would be in debt until 3000 assuming we make it that long, and Haliburton would be the beneficiary. If you could ensure your business a steady bankrole from the worlds wealthiest customer, would you?
Originally posted by Insertalias
First of all who is this "he" that recomended we not fight in WW2?
I have never talked about WW2 with you guys. Please don't use your feeble closed mind to try to guess how I think. You don't know me, I don't know you, we will probably never understand each other, so don't act like you know how I feel.
Second of all that is apples and ornges. WORLD WAR II was an actual WORLD WAR, not some super power completly renovating a country because it makes them feel more secure. We are the ones being the agressors. Don't tell me I hate America because I don't. I just think the government needs a major douche because it stinks more and more everyday. Your argment is invalid, but I will defend it regardlessly.
Originally posted by Insertalias
Wow that was fast.
As in the US poll, the trend lines in Iraqi public opinion were found to be distinctly negative. Thus, 71 percent of the Iraqi respondents said they considered coalition forces mostly as "occupiers" rather than liberators (19 percent). That rose to an overwhelming 81 percent when respondents from the Kurdish areas were excluded from the sample.
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/FE01Ak01.html
When I posted this percentage I will admit it was from memory, I remebered hearing it on the news, don't ask me what channel.
I know coitis interuptis isn't the answer, but more innocent deaths on our side or theirs aren't the answer ither.
Originally posted by Pale Rider
ASIA TIMES is what you're using as truth?
Jeeeeezuuz.....
Originally posted by DKSuddeth
is there evidence that would lead you to believe that they are less reliable than an american or arab newspaper?