Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I think what the media is calling the president is worse. I think what Hollywood is saying about him is worse. Calling him a Nazi and a racist. OH, BUT THEY'RE NOT THE PRESIDENT. So what. They're all acting like a bunch of spoiled children pouting and throwing a tantrum about losing an election.Whenever someone opposes Donald Trump's proposals, rather than respond by demonstrating the substantive merit of his proposals, Trump attacks the opposer. It was one thing to do that in the theater of campaigning, but as President the man's "best" responses are still that same childish retort.
Why has our society devolved into one of exchanges of attacks rather than exchanges of substance?
It's just his personality disorder. Everything is personal with him, including perceived slights. If you disagree, you have slighted him. He defends himself that way because it is instinctive, part of his character. No one should be surprised. I highly doubt if he is in cahoots with them or under any kind of obligation. People keep needling him about his comments, many moons ago, that he admires Putin. The more you needle him, the more the defensiveness comes out.There can only be four reasons Trump defends murderous Russia:
1. Business ties keeps him defending Russia no matter what they do.
2. He' being blackmailed.
3. He doesn't understand what he's saying.
4. He agrees with murder, poison and jailing political opponents.
It's either one of those or a combination. There are no other options.
More ducking responsiblilty by blaming others. Party of responsibility should be called party of whiny bitches.Like when 4 US citizens died over in Benghazi, and it was blamed on a movie, instead of Al Qaeda that Obama and the ex-vagina candidate said "Were on the Run"? Yeah, sure....^Typical conservative blames others and doesn't take responsibility.You mean like liberals always do?
I saw on the news yesterday that some two-bit country called Trump a "fool" yesterday, very disrespectfully, and you know they got their cue from all that's been said about Trump. We can disagree with him, but calling him a moron or Orange Jesus should be reserved for our living rooms. With the computer OFF.I think what the media is calling the president is worse. I think what Hollywood is saying about him is worse. Calling him a Nazi and a racist. OH, BUT THEY'RE NOT THE PRESIDENT. So what. They're all acting like a bunch of spoiled children pouting and throwing a tantrum about losing an election.Whenever someone opposes Donald Trump's proposals, rather than respond by demonstrating the substantive merit of his proposals, Trump attacks the opposer. It was one thing to do that in the theater of campaigning, but as President the man's "best" responses are still that same childish retort.
Why has our society devolved into one of exchanges of attacks rather than exchanges of substance?
Well, to answer the question posed in the thread title, no.Whenever someone opposes Donald Trump's proposals, rather than respond by demonstrating the substantive merit of his proposals, Trump attacks the opposer. It was one thing to do that in the theater of campaigning, but as President the man's "best" responses are still that same childish retort. Why has our society devolved into one of exchanges of attacks rather than exchanges of substance?
Yet again, you cannot see the difference between calling someone a loser and someone who spent their entire presidency getting even with anyone who doesn't agree with him.It's just his personality disorder. Everything is personal with him, including perceived slights. If you disagree, you have slighted him. He defends himself that way because it is instinctive, part of his character. No one should be surprised. I highly doubt if he is in cahoots with them or under any kind of obligation. People keep needling him about his comments, many moons ago, that he admires Putin. The more you needle him, the more the defensiveness comes out.There can only be four reasons Trump defends murderous Russia:
1. Business ties keeps him defending Russia no matter what they do.
2. He' being blackmailed.
3. He doesn't understand what he's saying.
4. He agrees with murder, poison and jailing political opponents.
It's either one of those or a combination. There are no other options.
As for the OP's question, he isn't a debater or a politician and that wasn't his training. He's been the one in charge, answerable to no one else. He doesn't have that ability to come up with a reply on the spur of the moment. And at his age, I doubt if he's going to learn.
I'm not surprised, because the only contact these two-bit country's leaders have had with Trump up until now is listening to our corrupt media calling him every name in the book. How are they supposed to know what he's really like.I saw on the news yesterday that some two-bit country called Trump a "fool" yesterday, very disrespectfully, and you know they got their cue from all that's been said about Trump. We can disagree with him, but calling him a moron or Orange Jesus should be reserved for our living rooms. With the computer OFF.I think what the media is calling the president is worse. I think what Hollywood is saying about him is worse. Calling him a Nazi and a racist. OH, BUT THEY'RE NOT THE PRESIDENT. So what. They're all acting like a bunch of spoiled children pouting and throwing a tantrum about losing an election.Whenever someone opposes Donald Trump's proposals, rather than respond by demonstrating the substantive merit of his proposals, Trump attacks the opposer. It was one thing to do that in the theater of campaigning, but as President the man's "best" responses are still that same childish retort.
Why has our society devolved into one of exchanges of attacks rather than exchanges of substance?
This is the CDZ.Don't be fucking stupid.What are you referring to?
When he didn't like the ruling from an American judge whose parents are Mexican he said the judge couldn't be impartial because he's Mexican. Even though born in Indiana.
Now another Federal Judge is "so-called".
Lyin' Ted
Littl' Maco
Crooked Hillary
Those are childish retorts.
Referring to the 41,000 American soldiers captured, many tortured, many killed, he said "I like people who weren't captured".
Childish retorts.
Why do these right wingers pretend to be such ignorant fucks? Is it a pretense?
The OP was talking about Trump, and so was I. There is no need to bring Obama into it, in any way.Yet again, you cannot see the difference between calling someone a loser and someone who spent their entire presidency getting even with anyone who doesn't agree with him.It's just his personality disorder. Everything is personal with him, including perceived slights. If you disagree, you have slighted him. He defends himself that way because it is instinctive, part of his character. No one should be surprised. I highly doubt if he is in cahoots with them or under any kind of obligation. People keep needling him about his comments, many moons ago, that he admires Putin. The more you needle him, the more the defensiveness comes out.There can only be four reasons Trump defends murderous Russia:
1. Business ties keeps him defending Russia no matter what they do.
2. He' being blackmailed.
3. He doesn't understand what he's saying.
4. He agrees with murder, poison and jailing political opponents.
It's either one of those or a combination. There are no other options.
As for the OP's question, he isn't a debater or a politician and that wasn't his training. He's been the one in charge, answerable to no one else. He doesn't have that ability to come up with a reply on the spur of the moment. And at his age, I doubt if he's going to learn.
Well, maybe you can. You think that Obama had every right to conduct a war on Fox News. You think Obama had the right to prevent conservative groups from raising cash for their candidates by withholding their 501k status. You think Obama had every right to use the IRS to attack his critics. To throw people in jail because they insulted Islam. To send billions of our taxpayers cash to Iran. To send billions to the UN. You think Obama had a right to attack police and make it next to impossible for them to do their jobs. You think it's just great that Obama was attacking businesses with the Justice Department and bring lawsuits and calling in the goons on any folks that weren't kissing his ass. You feel it was okay for Obama to try to undermine and subvert a foreign election. You feel its not a problem when he continues to undermine the Israeli government. You have no problem with Obama waiting till his last month in office to stab Israel in the back.
Yeah, Trump is a terrible person for calling someone a loser or an jerk. Well words mean something but that's all it is, just words. Quite a change from all of the vindictive actions of our last president.
/---- No attacks frtom the left - no sir-eee Bobtail.Whenever someone opposes Donald Trump's proposals, rather than respond by demonstrating the substantive merit of his proposals, Trump attacks the opposer. It was one thing to do that in the theater of campaigning, but as President the man's "best" responses are still that same childish retort.
Why has our society devolved into one of exchanges of attacks rather than exchanges of substance?
/---- I feel your pain -- BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAIt has to be clear to any thoughtful person that Trump is a fraud. Trump is an economic moron, thus his bankruptcies and lying about his wealth, hiding his taxes etc etc etc. The democrats need to learn that, they need to call the man out for what he is, an inherited rich boy who is has bully qualities, but is dumb as a post. A cowardly draft dodger who doesn't have a clue about the constitution or law - unless he hiding from it or boasting that he'll sue. What a buffoon America has elected.
Trump Likes Putin. Investors, Not So Much.
Even Trump's comments are dumb dumb dumb.
Ranking the Obama Economy
Why has our society devolved into one of exchanges of attacks rather than exchanges of substance?
Yes, but not completely. The loudest people are always the ones heard, but the "Silent Majority" still exists. They may not say much, but their presence is felt in the stock market, in the marketplace and on election day.....Why has our society devolved into one of exchanges of attacks rather than exchanges of substance?
Whenever someone opposes Donald Trump's proposals, rather than respond by demonstrating the substantive merit of his proposals, Trump attacks the opposer. It was one thing to do that in the theater of campaigning, but as President the man's "best" responses are still that same childish retort.
Why has our society devolved into one of exchanges of attacks rather than exchanges of substance?
That's just his style. He cuts through the crap. He sticks the knife straight in front, not in the back.....
Beg to differ, as he won with the majority of the popular vote in the majority of states to overcome the vagina candidate. This is not a Democracy, but a Representative Republic, which it seems you people on the left don't understand. As for using his pen and phone(remember the bi-racial president who said that?) to pass executive orders to stop the bleeding the 1/2 white president wanted to fundamentally transform America. We the People voted against the next 4 years of the same policies, as more people wanted to get back to "NORMAL"....The people who voted for Donald Trump like his style, part of which is to hit back at critics. He won with a minority of the popular vote which means most people were prepared to vote for a very unpopular candidate rather than have someone with a screw loose running the government by signing his name to a bunch of executive orders as if he is on a reality TV show. With evidence to the contrary, he makes dopey statements and those who are among his followers love him for it. Others who, up to now, had faith in their system of government knew this man was unfit for the job but the voting system beat them.Whenever someone opposes Donald Trump's proposals, rather than respond by demonstrating the substantive merit of his proposals, Trump attacks the opposer. It was one thing to do that in the theater of campaigning, but as President the man's "best" responses are still that same childish retort.
Why has our society devolved into one of exchanges of attacks rather than exchanges of substance?
Donald Trump gave plenty of warning about how he would govern by considering all opposition as enemies such as the Democrats and Republicans who give him support but not enough, federal judges, and the media (except hate radio and Faux News), while praising Vladimir Putin. What can one say? The Americans have no-one to blame for this mess but themselves.
Living in a total vaccum isn't reality.The OP was talking about Trump, and so was I. There is no need to bring Obama into it, in any way.Yet again, you cannot see the difference between calling someone a loser and someone who spent their entire presidency getting even with anyone who doesn't agree with him.It's just his personality disorder. Everything is personal with him, including perceived slights. If you disagree, you have slighted him. He defends himself that way because it is instinctive, part of his character. No one should be surprised. I highly doubt if he is in cahoots with them or under any kind of obligation. People keep needling him about his comments, many moons ago, that he admires Putin. The more you needle him, the more the defensiveness comes out.There can only be four reasons Trump defends murderous Russia:
1. Business ties keeps him defending Russia no matter what they do.
2. He' being blackmailed.
3. He doesn't understand what he's saying.
4. He agrees with murder, poison and jailing political opponents.
It's either one of those or a combination. There are no other options.
As for the OP's question, he isn't a debater or a politician and that wasn't his training. He's been the one in charge, answerable to no one else. He doesn't have that ability to come up with a reply on the spur of the moment. And at his age, I doubt if he's going to learn.
Well, maybe you can. You think that Obama had every right to conduct a war on Fox News. You think Obama had the right to prevent conservative groups from raising cash for their candidates by withholding their 501k status. You think Obama had every right to use the IRS to attack his critics. To throw people in jail because they insulted Islam. To send billions of our taxpayers cash to Iran. To send billions to the UN. You think Obama had a right to attack police and make it next to impossible for them to do their jobs. You think it's just great that Obama was attacking businesses with the Justice Department and bring lawsuits and calling in the goons on any folks that weren't kissing his ass. You feel it was okay for Obama to try to undermine and subvert a foreign election. You feel its not a problem when he continues to undermine the Israeli government. You have no problem with Obama waiting till his last month in office to stab Israel in the back.
Yeah, Trump is a terrible person for calling someone a loser or an jerk. Well words mean something but that's all it is, just words. Quite a change from all of the vindictive actions of our last president.
The left likes a president they can put on a cross and shut down opposition with martyrdom./---- No attacks frtom the left - no sir-eee Bobtail.Whenever someone opposes Donald Trump's proposals, rather than respond by demonstrating the substantive merit of his proposals, Trump attacks the opposer. It was one thing to do that in the theater of campaigning, but as President the man's "best" responses are still that same childish retort.
Why has our society devolved into one of exchanges of attacks rather than exchanges of substance?
Jimmy Carter: attacks on Barack Obama fuelled by racism - Telegraph
www.telegraph.co.uk › News › World News › Barack Obama
Sep 16, 2009 - Jimmy Carter has claimed that many of Barack Obama's most vocal ... voice to level a direct charge of racism at Mr Obama's critics. ..... Its ok to attack them and him, but criticism of Obama is racist and completely unacceptable.
Whenever someone opposes Donald Trump's proposals, rather than respond by demonstrating the substantive merit of his proposals, Trump attacks the opposer. It was one thing to do that in the theater of campaigning, but as President the man's "best" responses are still that same childish retort.
Why has our society devolved into one of exchanges of attacks rather than exchanges of substance?
That's just his style. He cuts through the crap. He sticks the knife straight in front, not in the back.....
