Itās naive to claim that Christianity is strictly a relationship between GOD and man. The archaic rituals, beliefs, instilled fears and coercion go much deeper than a relationship.What makes a belief in GOD religious? Religion is man's vain attempts to appease GOD. Christianity is strictly a relationship between GOD and man. If someone has a personal relationship with someone else, there are connections that transcends disbelief that that individual doesn't exist. GOD is a spirit and therefore isn't material. Can you show me the wind, or only point to what the wind does?Yours is the standard, stereotypical āgods of the gapsā pleading. Theyāre all the same. Theyāre all so grindingly predictable. Because there is a gap in our understanding of how the universe began, āthe gawds did itā. The debunking of IDāiot creationist pseudoscience doesn't require anything beyond holding IDāiot creationers to a standard of demonstration and peer review. There is no mystery why the IDāiot creation ministries donāt publish in and peer reviewed scientific journals; thatās because those journals have better things to do than resolve arguments such as how many angels can dance on the head of a pin.You made my head hurt. I have to admit most of it went over my head but they all seemed like well reasoned, logical points. Unfortunately I don't recall any evidence to support the logic. Yes we're here but...See "Genetically Modified Simpleton (GMS) Bumps His Head and Makes Baby Talk about the Fine-Tuned Argument" for my survey of the various, potential cosmologies.
I still don't know how any of this logic solves the equation creator = God = Yahweh?
Sorry about that. I meant to tell you that you could skip past the first five sections to get at the survey of the potential cosmologies. The takeaway is that just as logic and mathematics tell us that a past eternal cosmos is impossible, so does science. Hence, the physical world (the material realm of being) began to exist in the finite past and, thus, has a cause of its existence.
So what is the nature of this cause? It cannot be of a material substance! It would have to be of a timeless, spaceless, immaterial, immutable and indivisible substance. Absorb that.
There is nothing to suggest that any collection of supernatural gods had anything to do with the material realm. Matters of science do not address magic and supernaturalism.hand. The religious motivations underlying appeal to supernatural designer gods is self evident. So the question becomes: Can IDāiot creation appeals to supernaturalism be reformulated in a manner which would make it non-religious and scientifically relevant? The answer is no.