Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Then why involve yourself in the conversation? You should know where this conversation logically ends up. and I know it ends up at a double think dilemma, unless you are consistent with your beliefs. In that case Germany was justifiable to euthanize their mentally challenged as social fiscal burdensWhat about the act of aborting a fetus or causing the death of any other human without consent, when does that become wrong?How are they dead, and what is your definition. This is where your argument loses it's consistency
It is perfectly consistent. An aborted fetus is dead. It is without life. No heartbeat, brain waves or other signs of life.
Once that has happened, what should be done with the remains? Should they be thrown in an incinerator or donated?
Good question. And it would make an excellent discussion. But it is not the issue in this case.
It is truly amazing how distracted it appears at least people on this board are from keeping on topic.
My purpose was to show how completely void of compassion for humans that the MSM is by focusing on the death of ONE animal!
Instead of showing how devoid of humanity these methodical nazi-like "doctors" treating aborted tissues paid for with TAX dollars the MSM downplays that and
front pages "Cecil the Lion"!
And you contributors who bring ever subject other then this focus from Nixon, to whatever... you show this disjointed view that I by extrapolation would say
is common with Americans...i.e. totally influenced by the biased MSM...which was again the point!
This was the topic title: Does Cecil the lion trump Planned Parenthood selling aborted tissue stories???
Then why involve yourself in the conversation? You should know where this conversation logically ends up. and I know it ends up at a double think dilemma, unless you are consistent with your beliefs. In that case Germany was justifiable to euthanize their mentally challenged as social fiscal burdensWhat about the act of aborting a fetus or causing the death of any other human without consent, when does that become wrong?It is perfectly consistent. An aborted fetus is dead. It is without life. No heartbeat, brain waves or other signs of life.
Once that has happened, what should be done with the remains? Should they be thrown in an incinerator or donated?
Good question. And it would make an excellent discussion. But it is not the issue in this case.
It is truly amazing how distracted it appears at least people on this board are from keeping on topic.
My purpose was to show how completely void of compassion for humans that the MSM is by focusing on the death of ONE animal!
Instead of showing how devoid of humanity these methodical nazi-like "doctors" treating aborted tissues paid for with TAX dollars the MSM downplays that and
front pages "Cecil the Lion"!
And you contributors who bring ever subject other then this focus from Nixon, to whatever... you show this disjointed view that I by extrapolation would say
is common with Americans...i.e. totally influenced by the biased MSM...which was again the point!
This was the topic title: Does Cecil the lion trump Planned Parenthood selling aborted tissue stories???
Planned Parenthood does not use tax dollars for abortions. Yes, they receive tax dollars. But those go to other services, which actually constitute the majority of services provided by PP.
Also, your insistence that we answer whether or not the Cecil story trumps the PP story requires that we only read one story and only have compassion for one issue. When you start with a bogus statement, what follows is almost always just as bogus.
Then why involve yourself in the conversation? You should know where this conversation logically ends up. and I know it ends up at a double think dilemma, unless you are consistent with your beliefs. In that case Germany was justifiable to euthanize their mentally challenged as social fiscal burdensWhat about the act of aborting a fetus or causing the death of any other human without consent, when does that become wrong?
Good question. And it would make an excellent discussion. But it is not the issue in this case.
It is truly amazing how distracted it appears at least people on this board are from keeping on topic.
My purpose was to show how completely void of compassion for humans that the MSM is by focusing on the death of ONE animal!
Instead of showing how devoid of humanity these methodical nazi-like "doctors" treating aborted tissues paid for with TAX dollars the MSM downplays that and
front pages "Cecil the Lion"!
And you contributors who bring ever subject other then this focus from Nixon, to whatever... you show this disjointed view that I by extrapolation would say
is common with Americans...i.e. totally influenced by the biased MSM...which was again the point!
This was the topic title: Does Cecil the lion trump Planned Parenthood selling aborted tissue stories???
Planned Parenthood does not use tax dollars for abortions. Yes, they receive tax dollars. But those go to other services, which actually constitute the majority of services provided by PP.
Also, your insistence that we answer whether or not the Cecil story trumps the PP story requires that we only read one story and only have compassion for one issue. When you start with a bogus statement, what follows is almost always just as bogus.
How are you so certain that they are not using tax dollars?
What absolute proof is there that they don't.
This is the same agency that has hidden the truth and has distanced themselves about the founders of the agency.
You can find the information but you really need to hunt for the past information in order to get, like at university library's.
All of that information( books and magazine articles) was readily available to the public in the 60's and early 70's then it was filed away because Planned Parenthood did not like that information.
Then why involve yourself in the conversation? You should know where this conversation logically ends up. and I know it ends up at a double think dilemma, unless you are consistent with your beliefs. In that case Germany was justifiable to euthanize their mentally challenged as social fiscal burdensWhat about the act of aborting a fetus or causing the death of any other human without consent, when does that become wrong?
Good question. And it would make an excellent discussion. But it is not the issue in this case.
It is truly amazing how distracted it appears at least people on this board are from keeping on topic.
My purpose was to show how completely void of compassion for humans that the MSM is by focusing on the death of ONE animal!
Instead of showing how devoid of humanity these methodical nazi-like "doctors" treating aborted tissues paid for with TAX dollars the MSM downplays that and
front pages "Cecil the Lion"!
And you contributors who bring ever subject other then this focus from Nixon, to whatever... you show this disjointed view that I by extrapolation would say
is common with Americans...i.e. totally influenced by the biased MSM...which was again the point!
This was the topic title: Does Cecil the lion trump Planned Parenthood selling aborted tissue stories???
Planned Parenthood does not use tax dollars for abortions. Yes, they receive tax dollars. But those go to other services, which actually constitute the majority of services provided by PP.
Also, your insistence that we answer whether or not the Cecil story trumps the PP story requires that we only read one story and only have compassion for one issue. When you start with a bogus statement, what follows is almost always just as bogus.
How are you so certain that they are not using tax dollars?
What absolute proof is there that they don't.
This is the same agency that has hidden the truth and has distanced themselves about the founders of the agency.
You can find the information but you really need to hunt for the past information in order to get, like at university library's.
All of that information( books and magazine articles) was readily available to the public in the 60's and early 70's then it was filed away because Planned Parenthood did not like that information.
Then why involve yourself in the conversation? You should know where this conversation logically ends up. and I know it ends up at a double think dilemma, unless you are consistent with your beliefs. In that case Germany was justifiable to euthanize their mentally challenged as social fiscal burdensGood question. And it would make an excellent discussion. But it is not the issue in this case.
It is truly amazing how distracted it appears at least people on this board are from keeping on topic.
My purpose was to show how completely void of compassion for humans that the MSM is by focusing on the death of ONE animal!
Instead of showing how devoid of humanity these methodical nazi-like "doctors" treating aborted tissues paid for with TAX dollars the MSM downplays that and
front pages "Cecil the Lion"!
And you contributors who bring ever subject other then this focus from Nixon, to whatever... you show this disjointed view that I by extrapolation would say
is common with Americans...i.e. totally influenced by the biased MSM...which was again the point!
This was the topic title: Does Cecil the lion trump Planned Parenthood selling aborted tissue stories???
Planned Parenthood does not use tax dollars for abortions. Yes, they receive tax dollars. But those go to other services, which actually constitute the majority of services provided by PP.
Also, your insistence that we answer whether or not the Cecil story trumps the PP story requires that we only read one story and only have compassion for one issue. When you start with a bogus statement, what follows is almost always just as bogus.
How are you so certain that they are not using tax dollars?
What absolute proof is there that they don't.
This is the same agency that has hidden the truth and has distanced themselves about the founders of the agency.
You can find the information but you really need to hunt for the past information in order to get, like at university library's.
All of that information( books and magazine articles) was readily available to the public in the 60's and early 70's then it was filed away because Planned Parenthood did not like that information.
he doesn't know for sure. He's just repeating what PP tells them. I think he figures if he repeats it enough times a couple people will believe him.
Then why involve yourself in the conversation? You should know where this conversation logically ends up. and I know it ends up at a double think dilemma, unless you are consistent with your beliefs. In that case Germany was justifiable to euthanize their mentally challenged as social fiscal burdensGood question. And it would make an excellent discussion. But it is not the issue in this case.
It is truly amazing how distracted it appears at least people on this board are from keeping on topic.
My purpose was to show how completely void of compassion for humans that the MSM is by focusing on the death of ONE animal!
Instead of showing how devoid of humanity these methodical nazi-like "doctors" treating aborted tissues paid for with TAX dollars the MSM downplays that and
front pages "Cecil the Lion"!
And you contributors who bring ever subject other then this focus from Nixon, to whatever... you show this disjointed view that I by extrapolation would say
is common with Americans...i.e. totally influenced by the biased MSM...which was again the point!
This was the topic title: Does Cecil the lion trump Planned Parenthood selling aborted tissue stories???
Planned Parenthood does not use tax dollars for abortions. Yes, they receive tax dollars. But those go to other services, which actually constitute the majority of services provided by PP.
Also, your insistence that we answer whether or not the Cecil story trumps the PP story requires that we only read one story and only have compassion for one issue. When you start with a bogus statement, what follows is almost always just as bogus.
How are you so certain that they are not using tax dollars?
What absolute proof is there that they don't.
This is the same agency that has hidden the truth and has distanced themselves about the founders of the agency.
You can find the information but you really need to hunt for the past information in order to get, like at university library's.
All of that information( books and magazine articles) was readily available to the public in the 60's and early 70's then it was filed away because Planned Parenthood did not like that information.
First of all, the info I get is available to anyone.
The main reason I am sure the tax dollars aren't spent on abortions is that there are so many people watching PP and so deep into their business, the CEO can't fart without some pro-lifer's hair being blown.
PP presents a budget and shows where they spend the money. If you have ANY evidence that they use the tax dollars for abortions, feel free to post it.
Then why involve yourself in the conversation? You should know where this conversation logically ends up. and I know it ends up at a double think dilemma, unless you are consistent with your beliefs. In that case Germany was justifiable to euthanize their mentally challenged as social fiscal burdens
It is truly amazing how distracted it appears at least people on this board are from keeping on topic.
My purpose was to show how completely void of compassion for humans that the MSM is by focusing on the death of ONE animal!
Instead of showing how devoid of humanity these methodical nazi-like "doctors" treating aborted tissues paid for with TAX dollars the MSM downplays that and
front pages "Cecil the Lion"!
And you contributors who bring ever subject other then this focus from Nixon, to whatever... you show this disjointed view that I by extrapolation would say
is common with Americans...i.e. totally influenced by the biased MSM...which was again the point!
This was the topic title: Does Cecil the lion trump Planned Parenthood selling aborted tissue stories???
Planned Parenthood does not use tax dollars for abortions. Yes, they receive tax dollars. But those go to other services, which actually constitute the majority of services provided by PP.
Also, your insistence that we answer whether or not the Cecil story trumps the PP story requires that we only read one story and only have compassion for one issue. When you start with a bogus statement, what follows is almost always just as bogus.
How are you so certain that they are not using tax dollars?
What absolute proof is there that they don't.
This is the same agency that has hidden the truth and has distanced themselves about the founders of the agency.
You can find the information but you really need to hunt for the past information in order to get, like at university library's.
All of that information( books and magazine articles) was readily available to the public in the 60's and early 70's then it was filed away because Planned Parenthood did not like that information.
First of all, the info I get is available to anyone.
The main reason I am sure the tax dollars aren't spent on abortions is that there are so many people watching PP and so deep into their business, the CEO can't fart without some pro-lifer's hair being blown.
PP presents a budget and shows where they spend the money. If you have ANY evidence that they use the tax dollars for abortions, feel free to post it.
oh for sure. after seeing those videos we are suppose to take their word on their budgets. OH YOU BETCHA. my gawd
Then why involve yourself in the conversation? You should know where this conversation logically ends up. and I know it ends up at a double think dilemma, unless you are consistent with your beliefs. In that case Germany was justifiable to euthanize their mentally challenged as social fiscal burdens
It is truly amazing how distracted it appears at least people on this board are from keeping on topic.
My purpose was to show how completely void of compassion for humans that the MSM is by focusing on the death of ONE animal!
Instead of showing how devoid of humanity these methodical nazi-like "doctors" treating aborted tissues paid for with TAX dollars the MSM downplays that and
front pages "Cecil the Lion"!
And you contributors who bring ever subject other then this focus from Nixon, to whatever... you show this disjointed view that I by extrapolation would say
is common with Americans...i.e. totally influenced by the biased MSM...which was again the point!
This was the topic title: Does Cecil the lion trump Planned Parenthood selling aborted tissue stories???
Planned Parenthood does not use tax dollars for abortions. Yes, they receive tax dollars. But those go to other services, which actually constitute the majority of services provided by PP.
Also, your insistence that we answer whether or not the Cecil story trumps the PP story requires that we only read one story and only have compassion for one issue. When you start with a bogus statement, what follows is almost always just as bogus.
How are you so certain that they are not using tax dollars?
What absolute proof is there that they don't.
This is the same agency that has hidden the truth and has distanced themselves about the founders of the agency.
You can find the information but you really need to hunt for the past information in order to get, like at university library's.
All of that information( books and magazine articles) was readily available to the public in the 60's and early 70's then it was filed away because Planned Parenthood did not like that information.
he doesn't know for sure. He's just repeating what PP tells them. I think he figures if he repeats it enough times a couple people will believe him.
As opposed to posting bullshit and claiming it is based on your personal experience with PP?
If you have something valid to contribute to the conversation, then by all means do so. If not, go back to preaching about all the guys marching on DC to arrest Obama. It was a funnier line.
Then why involve yourself in the conversation? You should know where this conversation logically ends up. and I know it ends up at a double think dilemma, unless you are consistent with your beliefs. In that case Germany was justifiable to euthanize their mentally challenged as social fiscal burdens
It is truly amazing how distracted it appears at least people on this board are from keeping on topic.
My purpose was to show how completely void of compassion for humans that the MSM is by focusing on the death of ONE animal!
Instead of showing how devoid of humanity these methodical nazi-like "doctors" treating aborted tissues paid for with TAX dollars the MSM downplays that and
front pages "Cecil the Lion"!
And you contributors who bring ever subject other then this focus from Nixon, to whatever... you show this disjointed view that I by extrapolation would say
is common with Americans...i.e. totally influenced by the biased MSM...which was again the point!
This was the topic title: Does Cecil the lion trump Planned Parenthood selling aborted tissue stories???
Planned Parenthood does not use tax dollars for abortions. Yes, they receive tax dollars. But those go to other services, which actually constitute the majority of services provided by PP.
Also, your insistence that we answer whether or not the Cecil story trumps the PP story requires that we only read one story and only have compassion for one issue. When you start with a bogus statement, what follows is almost always just as bogus.
How are you so certain that they are not using tax dollars?
What absolute proof is there that they don't.
This is the same agency that has hidden the truth and has distanced themselves about the founders of the agency.
You can find the information but you really need to hunt for the past information in order to get, like at university library's.
All of that information( books and magazine articles) was readily available to the public in the 60's and early 70's then it was filed away because Planned Parenthood did not like that information.
First of all, the info I get is available to anyone.
The main reason I am sure the tax dollars aren't spent on abortions is that there are so many people watching PP and so deep into their business, the CEO can't fart without some pro-lifer's hair being blown.
PP presents a budget and shows where they spend the money. If you have ANY evidence that they use the tax dollars for abortions, feel free to post it.
oh for sure. after seeing those videos we are suppose to take their word on their budgets. OH YOU BETCHA. my gawd
It is truly amazing how distracted it appears at least people on this board are from keeping on topic.
My purpose was to show how completely void of compassion for humans that the MSM is by focusing on the death of ONE animal!
Instead of showing how devoid of humanity these methodical nazi-like "doctors" treating aborted tissues paid for with TAX dollars the MSM downplays that and
front pages "Cecil the Lion"!
And you contributors who bring ever subject other then this focus from Nixon, to whatever... you show this disjointed view that I by extrapolation would say
is common with Americans...i.e. totally influenced by the biased MSM...which was again the point!
This was the topic title: Does Cecil the lion trump Planned Parenthood selling aborted tissue stories???
Planned Parenthood does not use tax dollars for abortions. Yes, they receive tax dollars. But those go to other services, which actually constitute the majority of services provided by PP.
Also, your insistence that we answer whether or not the Cecil story trumps the PP story requires that we only read one story and only have compassion for one issue. When you start with a bogus statement, what follows is almost always just as bogus.
How are you so certain that they are not using tax dollars?
What absolute proof is there that they don't.
This is the same agency that has hidden the truth and has distanced themselves about the founders of the agency.
You can find the information but you really need to hunt for the past information in order to get, like at university library's.
All of that information( books and magazine articles) was readily available to the public in the 60's and early 70's then it was filed away because Planned Parenthood did not like that information.
he doesn't know for sure. He's just repeating what PP tells them. I think he figures if he repeats it enough times a couple people will believe him.
As opposed to posting bullshit and claiming it is based on your personal experience with PP?
If you have something valid to contribute to the conversation, then by all means do so. If not, go back to preaching about all the guys marching on DC to arrest Obama. It was a funnier line.
this typical from someone who finds nothing wrong with these videos. when question just get all smart ass
It is truly amazing how distracted it appears at least people on this board are from keeping on topic.
My purpose was to show how completely void of compassion for humans that the MSM is by focusing on the death of ONE animal!
Instead of showing how devoid of humanity these methodical nazi-like "doctors" treating aborted tissues paid for with TAX dollars the MSM downplays that and
front pages "Cecil the Lion"!
And you contributors who bring ever subject other then this focus from Nixon, to whatever... you show this disjointed view that I by extrapolation would say
is common with Americans...i.e. totally influenced by the biased MSM...which was again the point!
This was the topic title: Does Cecil the lion trump Planned Parenthood selling aborted tissue stories???
Planned Parenthood does not use tax dollars for abortions. Yes, they receive tax dollars. But those go to other services, which actually constitute the majority of services provided by PP.
Also, your insistence that we answer whether or not the Cecil story trumps the PP story requires that we only read one story and only have compassion for one issue. When you start with a bogus statement, what follows is almost always just as bogus.
How are you so certain that they are not using tax dollars?
What absolute proof is there that they don't.
This is the same agency that has hidden the truth and has distanced themselves about the founders of the agency.
You can find the information but you really need to hunt for the past information in order to get, like at university library's.
All of that information( books and magazine articles) was readily available to the public in the 60's and early 70's then it was filed away because Planned Parenthood did not like that information.
First of all, the info I get is available to anyone.
The main reason I am sure the tax dollars aren't spent on abortions is that there are so many people watching PP and so deep into their business, the CEO can't fart without some pro-lifer's hair being blown.
PP presents a budget and shows where they spend the money. If you have ANY evidence that they use the tax dollars for abortions, feel free to post it.
oh for sure. after seeing those videos we are suppose to take their word on their budgets. OH YOU BETCHA. my gawd
And what, pray tell, was there in those videos to suggest that they use federal money for abortions? Or what is there in those videos that is a lie?
Planned Parenthood does not use tax dollars for abortions. Yes, they receive tax dollars. But those go to other services, which actually constitute the majority of services provided by PP.
Also, your insistence that we answer whether or not the Cecil story trumps the PP story requires that we only read one story and only have compassion for one issue. When you start with a bogus statement, what follows is almost always just as bogus.
How are you so certain that they are not using tax dollars?
What absolute proof is there that they don't.
This is the same agency that has hidden the truth and has distanced themselves about the founders of the agency.
You can find the information but you really need to hunt for the past information in order to get, like at university library's.
All of that information( books and magazine articles) was readily available to the public in the 60's and early 70's then it was filed away because Planned Parenthood did not like that information.
First of all, the info I get is available to anyone.
The main reason I am sure the tax dollars aren't spent on abortions is that there are so many people watching PP and so deep into their business, the CEO can't fart without some pro-lifer's hair being blown.
PP presents a budget and shows where they spend the money. If you have ANY evidence that they use the tax dollars for abortions, feel free to post it.
oh for sure. after seeing those videos we are suppose to take their word on their budgets. OH YOU BETCHA. my gawd
And what, pray tell, was there in those videos to suggest that they use federal money for abortions? Or what is there in those videos that is a lie?
are you serious? you know what. If enough people tell their Congress they want fund taken away from PP. IT WILL happen and there isn't a damn thing you can do about except cry over it
Then why involve yourself in the conversation? You should know where this conversation logically ends up. and I know it ends up at a double think dilemma, unless you are consistent with your beliefs. In that case Germany was justifiable to euthanize their mentally challenged as social fiscal burdensGood question. And it would make an excellent discussion. But it is not the issue in this case.
It is truly amazing how distracted it appears at least people on this board are from keeping on topic.
My purpose was to show how completely void of compassion for humans that the MSM is by focusing on the death of ONE animal!
Instead of showing how devoid of humanity these methodical nazi-like "doctors" treating aborted tissues paid for with TAX dollars the MSM downplays that and
front pages "Cecil the Lion"!
And you contributors who bring ever subject other then this focus from Nixon, to whatever... you show this disjointed view that I by extrapolation would say
is common with Americans...i.e. totally influenced by the biased MSM...which was again the point!
This was the topic title: Does Cecil the lion trump Planned Parenthood selling aborted tissue stories???
Planned Parenthood does not use tax dollars for abortions. Yes, they receive tax dollars. But those go to other services, which actually constitute the majority of services provided by PP.
Also, your insistence that we answer whether or not the Cecil story trumps the PP story requires that we only read one story and only have compassion for one issue. When you start with a bogus statement, what follows is almost always just as bogus.
How are you so certain that they are not using tax dollars?
What absolute proof is there that they don't.
This is the same agency that has hidden the truth and has distanced themselves about the founders of the agency.
You can find the information but you really need to hunt for the past information in order to get, like at university library's.
All of that information( books and magazine articles) was readily available to the public in the 60's and early 70's then it was filed away because Planned Parenthood did not like that information.
First of all, the info I get is available to anyone.
The main reason I am sure the tax dollars aren't spent on abortions is that there are so many people watching PP and so deep into their business, the CEO can't fart without some pro-lifer's hair being blown.
PP presents a budget and shows where they spend the money. If you have ANY evidence that they use the tax dollars for abortions, feel free to post it.
It is truly amazing how distracted it appears at least people on this board are from keeping on topic.
My purpose was to show how completely void of compassion for humans that the MSM is by focusing on the death of ONE animal!
Instead of showing how devoid of humanity these methodical nazi-like "doctors" treating aborted tissues paid for with TAX dollars the MSM downplays that and
front pages "Cecil the Lion"!
And you contributors who bring ever subject other then this focus from Nixon, to whatever... you show this disjointed view that I by extrapolation would say
is common with Americans...i.e. totally influenced by the biased MSM...which was again the point!
This was the topic title: Does Cecil the lion trump Planned Parenthood selling aborted tissue stories???
Planned Parenthood does not use tax dollars for abortions. Yes, they receive tax dollars. But those go to other services, which actually constitute the majority of services provided by PP.
Also, your insistence that we answer whether or not the Cecil story trumps the PP story requires that we only read one story and only have compassion for one issue. When you start with a bogus statement, what follows is almost always just as bogus.
How are you so certain that they are not using tax dollars?
What absolute proof is there that they don't.
This is the same agency that has hidden the truth and has distanced themselves about the founders of the agency.
You can find the information but you really need to hunt for the past information in order to get, like at university library's.
All of that information( books and magazine articles) was readily available to the public in the 60's and early 70's then it was filed away because Planned Parenthood did not like that information.
he doesn't know for sure. He's just repeating what PP tells them. I think he figures if he repeats it enough times a couple people will believe him.
As opposed to posting bullshit and claiming it is based on your personal experience with PP?
If you have something valid to contribute to the conversation, then by all means do so. If not, go back to preaching about all the guys marching on DC to arrest Obama. It was a funnier line.
this typical from someone who finds nothing wrong with these videos. when question just get all smart ass
How are you so certain that they are not using tax dollars?
What absolute proof is there that they don't.
This is the same agency that has hidden the truth and has distanced themselves about the founders of the agency.
You can find the information but you really need to hunt for the past information in order to get, like at university library's.
All of that information( books and magazine articles) was readily available to the public in the 60's and early 70's then it was filed away because Planned Parenthood did not like that information.
First of all, the info I get is available to anyone.
The main reason I am sure the tax dollars aren't spent on abortions is that there are so many people watching PP and so deep into their business, the CEO can't fart without some pro-lifer's hair being blown.
PP presents a budget and shows where they spend the money. If you have ANY evidence that they use the tax dollars for abortions, feel free to post it.
oh for sure. after seeing those videos we are suppose to take their word on their budgets. OH YOU BETCHA. my gawd
And what, pray tell, was there in those videos to suggest that they use federal money for abortions? Or what is there in those videos that is a lie?
are you serious? you know what. If enough people tell their Congress they want fund taken away from PP. IT WILL happen and there isn't a damn thing you can do about except cry over it
Yep. That is how it works. And people like you have been screaming about federal funding for PP since Carter was president. How is that working out for you?
Then why involve yourself in the conversation? You should know where this conversation logically ends up. and I know it ends up at a double think dilemma, unless you are consistent with your beliefs. In that case Germany was justifiable to euthanize their mentally challenged as social fiscal burdens
It is truly amazing how distracted it appears at least people on this board are from keeping on topic.
My purpose was to show how completely void of compassion for humans that the MSM is by focusing on the death of ONE animal!
Instead of showing how devoid of humanity these methodical nazi-like "doctors" treating aborted tissues paid for with TAX dollars the MSM downplays that and
front pages "Cecil the Lion"!
And you contributors who bring ever subject other then this focus from Nixon, to whatever... you show this disjointed view that I by extrapolation would say
is common with Americans...i.e. totally influenced by the biased MSM...which was again the point!
This was the topic title: Does Cecil the lion trump Planned Parenthood selling aborted tissue stories???
Planned Parenthood does not use tax dollars for abortions. Yes, they receive tax dollars. But those go to other services, which actually constitute the majority of services provided by PP.
Also, your insistence that we answer whether or not the Cecil story trumps the PP story requires that we only read one story and only have compassion for one issue. When you start with a bogus statement, what follows is almost always just as bogus.
How are you so certain that they are not using tax dollars?
What absolute proof is there that they don't.
This is the same agency that has hidden the truth and has distanced themselves about the founders of the agency.
You can find the information but you really need to hunt for the past information in order to get, like at university library's.
All of that information( books and magazine articles) was readily available to the public in the 60's and early 70's then it was filed away because Planned Parenthood did not like that information.
First of all, the info I get is available to anyone.
The main reason I am sure the tax dollars aren't spent on abortions is that there are so many people watching PP and so deep into their business, the CEO can't fart without some pro-lifer's hair being blown.
PP presents a budget and shows where they spend the money. If you have ANY evidence that they use the tax dollars for abortions, feel free to post it.
There are many ways of cooking the numbers and of course it will not be made public.
Try to get the actual magazine articles and books written by Sanger and the rest of the foundries on their American Eugenics Society.
The bigger outrage is how cold, casual and insensitive they are, talking about them like they are nothing.
First of all, the info I get is available to anyone.
The main reason I am sure the tax dollars aren't spent on abortions is that there are so many people watching PP and so deep into their business, the CEO can't fart without some pro-lifer's hair being blown.
PP presents a budget and shows where they spend the money. If you have ANY evidence that they use the tax dollars for abortions, feel free to post it.
oh for sure. after seeing those videos we are suppose to take their word on their budgets. OH YOU BETCHA. my gawd
And what, pray tell, was there in those videos to suggest that they use federal money for abortions? Or what is there in those videos that is a lie?
are you serious? you know what. If enough people tell their Congress they want fund taken away from PP. IT WILL happen and there isn't a damn thing you can do about except cry over it
Yep. That is how it works. And people like you have been screaming about federal funding for PP since Carter was president. How is that working out for you?
right, PEOPLE "like me" . you're hysterical over funding of a baby killing industry. what does that say ABOUT YOU
If I knew that someone was killing babies I would certainly notify the police.First of all, the info I get is available to anyone.
The main reason I am sure the tax dollars aren't spent on abortions is that there are so many people watching PP and so deep into their business, the CEO can't fart without some pro-lifer's hair being blown.
PP presents a budget and shows where they spend the money. If you have ANY evidence that they use the tax dollars for abortions, feel free to post it.
oh for sure. after seeing those videos we are suppose to take their word on their budgets. OH YOU BETCHA. my gawd
And what, pray tell, was there in those videos to suggest that they use federal money for abortions? Or what is there in those videos that is a lie?
are you serious? you know what. If enough people tell their Congress they want fund taken away from PP. IT WILL happen and there isn't a damn thing you can do about except cry over it
Yep. That is how it works. And people like you have been screaming about federal funding for PP since Carter was president. How is that working out for you?
right, PEOPLE "like me" . you're hysterical over funding of a baby killing industry. what does that say ABOUT YOU
But you commented about not letting valuable tissue go to waste, which leads into whether or not it's ethical to end the life of a human who is unable to make that decision. And then you circled back to saying it's not relevant. I missing where it lost relevanceThen why involve yourself in the conversation? You should know where this conversation logically ends up. and I know it ends up at a double think dilemma, unless you are consistent with your beliefs. In that case Germany was justifiable to euthanize their mentally challenged as social fiscal burdensWhat about the act of aborting a fetus or causing the death of any other human without consent, when does that become wrong?How are they dead, and what is your definition. This is where your argument loses it's consistency
It is perfectly consistent. An aborted fetus is dead. It is without life. No heartbeat, brain waves or other signs of life.
Once that has happened, what should be done with the remains? Should they be thrown in an incinerator or donated?
Good question. And it would make an excellent discussion. But it is not the issue in this case.
The fact that others expect the topic to change does not effect my discussion. The topic is about the "selling" aborted tissues v. Cecil the lion being killed. I have no problem discussing the details of either. But the topic need not be about abortion.
And since the point of the thread is to compare the media and public reaction to the two stories, making it about abortion is silly. Can you imagine a headline "Planned Parenthood Performs Abortions"?
But you commented about not letting valuable tissue go to waste, which leads into whether or not it's ethical to end the life of a human who is unable to make that decision. And then you circled back to saying it's not relevant. I missing where it lost relevanceThen why involve yourself in the conversation? You should know where this conversation logically ends up. and I know it ends up at a double think dilemma, unless you are consistent with your beliefs. In that case Germany was justifiable to euthanize their mentally challenged as social fiscal burdensWhat about the act of aborting a fetus or causing the death of any other human without consent, when does that become wrong?It is perfectly consistent. An aborted fetus is dead. It is without life. No heartbeat, brain waves or other signs of life.
Once that has happened, what should be done with the remains? Should they be thrown in an incinerator or donated?
Good question. And it would make an excellent discussion. But it is not the issue in this case.
The fact that others expect the topic to change does not effect my discussion. The topic is about the "selling" aborted tissues v. Cecil the lion being killed. I have no problem discussing the details of either. But the topic need not be about abortion.
And since the point of the thread is to compare the media and public reaction to the two stories, making it about abortion is silly. Can you imagine a headline "Planned Parenthood Performs Abortions"?
