Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Then all of those who still can't accept the election results can engage in group therapy while the rest of us can rationally debate the new administration's policies and legislation.
What say you?
First, we shouldn't completely neglect what the president "says" i.e his words, as words can, and often do, predict action.
But I'm up to debate actual policies.
As everyone already knows, Trump's already attempted to solidify a ban on immigration from six Muslim countries--Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, Yemen-- despite the fact that there hasn't been a single terrorist attack on U.S soil where the perpetrators had actually originated from any of those countries. So this is a useless act that simply gives us the illusion of security whilst making us less secure by engineering racial and religious tension.
Whether it is a "useless act" remains to be seen, and the "recruitment" argument has disproven by the last 8 years of Obama's appeasement policy.
Trump plans on raising the military budget by 54 billion dollars despite the fact that the United States already spends more on military than the next four countries combined. Once again, another attempt to give us the illusion of safety and security.
According to your logic, less military spending = greater security?
His authorized Yemen raid was responsible for 20 innocent civilian deaths, including 10 children, and one U.S Navy Seal. Anyone who criticized Hillary Clinton for endangering our fellow Americans in Benghazi has the minimal integrity to also be outraged in the Yemeni case. Ignoring the injustices of the Yemen raid says a lot. We can expect more of this types of state violence down the line where human costs outweigh any human benefits, if there were indeed any in this specific case...
Then all of those who still can't accept the election results can engage in group therapy while the rest of us can rationally debate the new administration's policies and legislation.
What say you?
First, we shouldn't completely neglect what the president "says" i.e his words, as words can, and often do, predict action.
But I'm up to debate actual policies.
As everyone already knows, Trump's already attempted to solidify a ban on immigration from six Muslim countries--Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, Yemen-- despite the fact that there hasn't been a single terrorist attack on U.S soil where the perpetrators had actually originated from any of those countries. So this is a useless act that simply gives us the illusion of security whilst making us less secure by engineering racial and religious tension.
Whether it is a "useless act" remains to be seen, and the "recruitment" argument has disproven by the last 8 years of Obama's appeasement policy.
Trump plans on raising the military budget by 54 billion dollars despite the fact that the United States already spends more on military than the next four countries combined. Once again, another attempt to give us the illusion of safety and security.
According to your logic, less military spending = greater security?
His authorized Yemen raid was responsible for 20 innocent civilian deaths, including 10 children, and one U.S Navy Seal. Anyone who criticized Hillary Clinton for endangering our fellow Americans in Benghazi has the minimal integrity to also be outraged in the Yemeni case. Ignoring the injustices of the Yemen raid says a lot. We can expect more of this types of state violence down the line where human costs outweigh any human benefits, if there were indeed any in this specific case...
You do not substantiate a valid comparison. Benghazi involved callous disregard for the safety of American citizens and a subsequent cover up at the highest levels of government. The Yemen raid was a military operation that resulted in higher than anticipated casualties. Do seriously believe that Trump ordered that raid over the objections of its military planners?