Do the poor earn their income?

I recieve a monthly check from the VA as compensation for service connected disabilites. You guys think I didn't earn that money?

There isn't a conservative alive who does not support giving a veteran his due.

It will sickitate them no end to see a veteran try to use his service injuries in any way as means of political pursuasion which is counter to the mission of the US Armed Forces though.
 
Demonstrate that you are productive, self-accountable citizen that after due effort of your own output needs temporary assistance with things to make your children more educated or healthier and I am all for helping with essentials.

Our system is being gamed in every aspect and the give a damn of working stiffs like me is pret' near give out.

There are folks with bona fide disabilities that don't work and should receive social safety net support if needed.

Then there are those who game the system and don't work and demand entitlment of such sustenance..

The Liberal refusal to make a separation / distinction between the two and take steps to cull them from the ranks means the ones who truly need it receive less benefit and little opportunity for meaningful reform.

I dont think liberals refuse You have to understand these people are LYING to gain things from the system. At least the ones who could work. Those people deserve nothing for abusing the system set in place to help others.
I'd like to see ONE of these RWers produce some numbers of the people that are actually "gaming the system."

They say that stuff at every turn, however, never accompanied by any numbers or stats.

Funny that.

Because there are no "stats."

Besides the only cases that are even mentioned when it comes to welfare fraud are the extreme cases of woman claiming they have 37 babies, or asshats registering their pets..

What about the project bitches that have kids for the extra 200 a month? what about those bitches selling their foodstamps for 50 cents on the dollar?? What about those stupid lazy ass ghetto motherfuckers that gamble with their "free money?"

I have personally seen welfare fucks walk into a bodega, grab a 100 dollars worth of shit off the shelf, pay for it with their wic (welfare card) and the asshole that owns the joint pulls a 50 out his pocket and hands it right over to the dishonest welfare clown...

That is welfare fraud and it's an epidemic....

Yeah thats right - in urban shit holes known as ghettos, store owners will buy foodstamps for 50 cents on the dollar.... Thats right, 100 bucks goes into the bodega owners revenue for the day, while he pays 50 bucks cash to make a profit of 50 bucks....

So how the fuck do you keep track of that??? because that scam is costing taxpayers in Illinois tens of millions.

Oh not to mention turning a dollar into 50 cents is not good for the economy...
 
Last edited:
we are talking about working poor earning their income not entitlements by the way with the welfare reforms that went through under Clinton very few people get away without working unless they are truly disabled.


No... we are talking about the poor

Not the working poor


Do the poor earn their income. Do the people on entitlements.... EARN that income?


I don't know what planet you live on... but most of the people on welfare are full well capable of working.
when you say Poor you are including those folks that work 12 hours a day every day of the week and still earn only 7 bucks an hour and get no entitlements...so I would say that some folks earn it...entitlements run out after a certain period..then they have to work...


They should have been working all along then.... if they only will get a job when the entitlements run out. :eusa_whistle:

The working poor are working poor.... the operative word is WORKING. They work hard for the money that they have.

The "poor" ... I guess i need to spell it out for you. The lazy asses who have never worked a day in their lives...and feel that the government..and all of us OWE them a lifestyle of their choosing. Do these people "earn" their living?
 
Read the posts again.

You made a claim that is apparently not true. I have no issue with you doing with your earnings what you please. You obviously don't "need every penny" if you can afford to spend $60 on ONE video game that requires a console which costs at least $200.

That's 26,000 pennies you obviously don't "need." Beyond that claim, I have no issue.

Asterism, it is off to the dungeon with you! Don't you realize that anyone in your position does not deserve the need for entertainment. How dare you try to eek out a little self satisfaction after being so distainfully unproductive.

I really can't believe some of the posts I read here.:cuckoo:

who are u to decide that ?

Ok, I must spell it out for those who cannot see past their nose. I do not know the ethnenticity of Plasmaball but he is out there shoveling concrete(one of the jobs that are, many times, pointed out to be reserved for illegal aliens as American won't do it) and someone has the audacity to tell him he has spend 26,000 pennies for a game and therefore does not need all that he works so hard to make. This insinuates that he should not persue anything to please himself until he makes a 'suitable' wage. This is tyrannical aristocracy at its best.
 
I recieve a monthly check from the VA as compensation for service connected disabilites. You guys think I didn't earn that money?

No... you earned your disability check. You earned it by serving our country.


That being said. I am sure many on welfare are perfectly capable of joining the military to earn their checks.
 
If you want a simple example of how the system is being gamed tomorrow afternoon walk into your local SS office and count the number of people in line that are over 60 and the number of people that are under 60 ... And do a quick ratio in head remembering tgat it is supposed to be a safety net for retired persons.

I haven't been in a SS office in awhile, but I would guess there are 10x more young people there then retirement aged folks there
 
Asterism, it is off to the dungeon with you! Don't you realize that anyone in your position does not deserve the need for entertainment. How dare you try to eek out a little self satisfaction after being so distainfully unproductive.

I really can't believe some of the posts I read here.:cuckoo:

who are u to decide that ?

Ok, I must spell it out for those who cannot see past their nose. I do not know the ethnenticity of Plasmaball but he is out there shoveling concrete(one of the jobs that are, many times, pointed out to be reserved for illegal aliens as American won't do it) and someone has the audacity to tell him he has spend 26,000 pennies for a game and therefore does not need all that he works so hard to make. This insinuates that he should not persue anything to please himself until he makes a 'suitable' wage. This is tyrannical aristocracy at its best.


If.... and i don't know if he is or not..... IF... he is receiving ANY form of government assistance.... If he can afford to spend money on luxury games.... he does NOT NEED any kind of assistance.

IF.... he works hard and receives NO assistance of any kind... then he worked for his money... and deserves to purchase what ever he wants. His money... he earned it.
 
we are talking about working poor earning their income not entitlements by the way with the welfare reforms that went through under Clinton very few people get away without working unless they are truly disabled.


No... we are talking about the poor

Not the working poor


Do the poor earn their income. Do the people on entitlements.... EARN that income?


I don't know what planet you live on... but most of the people on welfare are full well capable of working.
when you say Poor you are including those folks that work 12 hours a day every day of the week and still earn only 7 bucks an hour and get no entitlements...so I would say that some folks earn it...entitlements run out after a certain period..then they have to work...

The only people who work 12 hours a day are those who don't qualify for entitlements. They're generally single white males and they have no other option but to work 60 hours a week, because if they didn't they wouldn't be able to eat or put a roof over their head.

Now on the other hand if you're anything but a white straight male, you're entitled to welfare..
 
The "poor" ... I guess i need to spell it out for you. The lazy asses who have never worked a day in their lives...and feel that the government..and all of us OWE them a lifestyle of their choosing. Do these people "earn" their living?

Stop calling our Presedent a 'poor' dude :)
 
No... we are talking about the poor

Not the working poor


Do the poor earn their income. Do the people on entitlements.... EARN that income?


I don't know what planet you live on... but most of the people on welfare are full well capable of working.
when you say Poor you are including those folks that work 12 hours a day every day of the week and still earn only 7 bucks an hour and get no entitlements...so I would say that some folks earn it...entitlements run out after a certain period..then they have to work...

The only people who work 12 hours a day are those who don't qualify for entitlements. They're generally single white males and they have no other option but to work 60 hours a week, because if they didn't they wouldn't be able to eat or put a roof over their head.

Now on the other hand if you're anything but a white straight male, you're entitled to welfare..

Your proof that they are generally white males? That is absolutely ridiculous..and no not everyone is entitled or wants welfare. I earn 1000 bucks a month WITH child support and I do not get or qualify for welfare nor do I want it.
 
who are u to decide that ?

Ok, I must spell it out for those who cannot see past their nose. I do not know the ethnenticity of Plasmaball but he is out there shoveling concrete(one of the jobs that are, many times, pointed out to be reserved for illegal aliens as American won't do it) and someone has the audacity to tell him he has spend 26,000 pennies for a game and therefore does not need all that he works so hard to make. This insinuates that he should not persue anything to please himself until he makes a 'suitable' wage. This is tyrannical aristocracy at its best.


If.... and i don't know if he is or not..... IF... he is receiving ANY form of government assistance.... If he can afford to spend money on luxury games.... he does NOT NEED any kind of assistance.

IF.... he works hard and receives NO assistance of any kind... then he worked for his money... and deserves to purchase what ever he wants. His money... he earned it.

And if he does recieve food stamps, for example, he should forfiet the foodstamps upon persuing any type of entertainment that requires any money........ Unbelievable! You are saying that the poor do not deserve any of the simple human desires or needs others take for granted because they ask for assistance.
 
The definition used for poverty level is a family of 4 living on wages of $22,314 a year...for a family of four...$22,314 ayear...for a family of four...get it?

Working families of four people making $22,314 a year or less.

Poverty rate rises as incomes decline - Census - Sep. 13, 2011

Median income has changed very little over the last 30 years. Adjusted for inflation, the middle-income family only earned 11% more in 2010 than they did in 1980, while the richest 5% in America saw their incomes surge 42%.

"Over that period of time, it's not that the American economy has necessarily performed badly," Osterman said. "As a country we're richer over that period, but there's been this real shift in where the income has gone, and it's to the top."

Amplifying that trend, the bottom 60% of households saw their income fall last year, while households making $100,000 or more enjoyed a rise in income.

$22,314 a year for a family of four, do they earn their income...morons.


How much tax do you neo-cons think the poor should pay on that outrageous salary?
 
Ok, I must spell it out for those who cannot see past their nose. I do not know the ethnenticity of Plasmaball but he is out there shoveling concrete(one of the jobs that are, many times, pointed out to be reserved for illegal aliens as American won't do it) and someone has the audacity to tell him he has spend 26,000 pennies for a game and therefore does not need all that he works so hard to make. This insinuates that he should not persue anything to please himself until he makes a 'suitable' wage. This is tyrannical aristocracy at its best.


If.... and i don't know if he is or not..... IF... he is receiving ANY form of government assistance.... If he can afford to spend money on luxury games.... he does NOT NEED any kind of assistance.

IF.... he works hard and receives NO assistance of any kind... then he worked for his money... and deserves to purchase what ever he wants. His money... he earned it.

And if he does recieve food stamps, for example, he should forfiet the foodstamps upon persuing any type of entertainment that requires any money........ Unbelievable! You are saying that the poor do not deserve any of the simple human desires or needs others take for granted because they ask for assistance.


That's about right.

If he is getting food stamps.... Then he could afford to lose $260 less of that assistance.

Having the assistance... afforded him the game and console... ie.. the tax payers paid for his lifestyle.

I am saying... an Xbox... is a desire, a want.... not a NEED. You don't NEED an Xbox to survive. You cant eat it...you baby cant eat it... it wont pay the rent or power bill.

It is a luxury. And an expensive one at that.
 
The definition used for poverty level is a family of 4 living on wages of $22,314 a year...for a family of four...$22,314 ayear...for a family of four...get it?

Working families of four people making $22,314 a year or less.

Poverty rate rises as incomes decline - Census - Sep. 13, 2011

Median income has changed very little over the last 30 years. Adjusted for inflation, the middle-income family only earned 11% more in 2010 than they did in 1980, while the richest 5% in America saw their incomes surge 42%.

"Over that period of time, it's not that the American economy has necessarily performed badly," Osterman said. "As a country we're richer over that period, but there's been this real shift in where the income has gone, and it's to the top."

Amplifying that trend, the bottom 60% of households saw their income fall last year, while households making $100,000 or more enjoyed a rise in income.

$22,314 a year for a family of four, do they earn their income...morons.


How much tax do you neo-cons think the poor should pay on that outrageous salary?



And what about the ones who don't work and earn their living....



How much income do they earn?
 
The definition used for poverty level is a family of 4 living on wages of $22,314 a year...for a family of four...$22,314 ayear...for a family of four...get it?

Working families of four people making $22,314 a year or less.

Poverty rate rises as incomes decline - Census - Sep. 13, 2011

Median income has changed very little over the last 30 years. Adjusted for inflation, the middle-income family only earned 11% more in 2010 than they did in 1980, while the richest 5% in America saw their incomes surge 42%.

"Over that period of time, it's not that the American economy has necessarily performed badly," Osterman said. "As a country we're richer over that period, but there's been this real shift in where the income has gone, and it's to the top."

Amplifying that trend, the bottom 60% of households saw their income fall last year, while households making $100,000 or more enjoyed a rise in income.

$22,314 a year for a family of four, do they earn their income...morons.


How much tax do you neo-cons think the poor should pay on that outrageous salary?



And what about the ones who don't work and earn their living....



How much income do they earn?

Isn't your answer in your question?

But again, how much of that $22,314 do you want the family of four to pay in taxes?
 
Last edited:
I going to throw this out there ... And likely be stoned for it, but what the heck

if your on public assistance and playing your xbox 6-8 hours a day (as some do) ... Which is the cause and which is the effect?
 
Last edited:
If.... and i don't know if he is or not..... IF... he is receiving ANY form of government assistance.... If he can afford to spend money on luxury games.... he does NOT NEED any kind of assistance.

IF.... he works hard and receives NO assistance of any kind... then he worked for his money... and deserves to purchase what ever he wants. His money... he earned it.

And if he does recieve food stamps, for example, he should forfiet the foodstamps upon persuing any type of entertainment that requires any money........ Unbelievable! You are saying that the poor do not deserve any of the simple human desires or needs others take for granted because they ask for assistance.


That's about right.

If he is getting food stamps.... Then he could afford to lose $260 less of that assistance.

Having the assistance... afforded him the game and console... ie.. the tax payers paid for his lifestyle.

I am saying... an Xbox... is a desire, a want.... not a NEED. You don't NEED an Xbox to survive. You cant eat it...you baby cant eat it... it wont pay the rent or power bill.

It is a luxury. And an expensive one at that.

Please note my signature. This is exactly why I believe as I do. When government assistance is given out, the reciever looses some freedom. It is opinions like yours that make me fear the result of our socialistic movement to more and more government assistance.

Tyrants like you would enjoy very much having the masses under their thumb because they cannot make it in an economy that has been socially engineered by government programs to the point of near failure and create a majority of poor people.

The more the economy fails the more 'subjects' for tyrants, like you, to dictate to.
 

Forum List

Back
Top