Do democrats have a history of helping minorities?

Do democrats have a history of helping minorities?


  • Total voters
    26
I'm going to let you in on a secret, you poor misled fool.

The Democratic Party is attempting to enslave everyone to the government, not just blacks.

This business about claiming Democrats are enslaving blacks is just a really, really stupid way of hiding the bigots infecting the Right.
You are a fool. Bigotryis something for you leftwing loons and girl you are a leftist. You can call your self a republican but it is in name only. All your posts prove daily you are a liberal not a conservative.

tapatalk post

You sorry assed bot...

>> The NAACP was formed partly in response to the continuing horrific practice of lynching and the 1908 race riot in Springfield, the capital of Illinois and resting place of President Abraham Lincoln. Appalled at the violence that was committed against blacks, a group of white liberals that included Mary White Ovington and Oswald Garrison Villard, both the descendants of abolitionists, William English Walling and Dr. Henry Moscowitz issued a call for a meeting to discuss racial justice. Some 60 people, seven of whom were African American (including W. E. B. Du Bois, Ida B. Wells-Barnett and Mary Church Terrell), signed the call, which was released on the centennial of Lincoln's birth. << (naacp.org)

Some were Republicans, duBois was a Socialist; some we don't know (or care) what party they may have been part of; they were liberals. Because that's what "all men are created equal" IS. But I doubt you have the mental dexterity to sniff the difference between Liberals and Democrats or figure out that it's not related to what party one belongs to.

You are really stretching the semantics here Pogo - the true definition of a Liberal indicates open mindedness , todays Liberals are perhaps the most closed minded people humanity has ever bred. But I have to applaud your post "to sniff the difference between Liberals and Democrats or figure out that it's not related to what party one belongs to."
 
2e1au8j.png
 
Last edited:
No. But since the choices were reversed I clicked yes by accident. Democratic policies have a tendency to to create dependency. Take that rhyme to the bank.

The poll question was never a valid one anyway. The DP is said to be the oldest political party in the world and the idea of a party standing for the same thing todays it stood for 50, 100 or 190 years ago, as if time is forever frozen and static, is absurd.
 
You are a fool. Bigotryis something for you leftwing loons and girl you are a leftist. You can call your self a republican but it is in name only. All your posts prove daily you are a liberal not a conservative.

tapatalk post

You sorry assed bot...

>> The NAACP was formed partly in response to the continuing horrific practice of lynching and the 1908 race riot in Springfield, the capital of Illinois and resting place of President Abraham Lincoln. Appalled at the violence that was committed against blacks, a group of white liberals that included Mary White Ovington and Oswald Garrison Villard, both the descendants of abolitionists, William English Walling and Dr. Henry Moscowitz issued a call for a meeting to discuss racial justice. Some 60 people, seven of whom were African American (including W. E. B. Du Bois, Ida B. Wells-Barnett and Mary Church Terrell), signed the call, which was released on the centennial of Lincoln's birth. << (naacp.org)

Some were Republicans, duBois was a Socialist; some we don't know (or care) what party they may have been part of; they were liberals. Because that's what "all men are created equal" IS. But I doubt you have the mental dexterity to sniff the difference between Liberals and Democrats or figure out that it's not related to what party one belongs to.

You are really stretching the semantics here Pogo - the true definition of a Liberal indicates open mindedness , todays Liberals are perhaps the most closed minded people humanity has ever bred. But I have to applaud your post "to sniff the difference between Liberals and Democrats or figure out that it's not related to what party one belongs to."

Uh thanks -- I think.

Sounds like you're saying "I disagree with you but I agree with you". :confused:

If it's any clarification the point is that "liberalism" and "conservatism" are forces independent of "Democrats" and "Republicans". Which distinction is I think, based on reading his posts, a concept far beyond the OP's ken.
 
Another pie in the sky republican thread how the democrats enslave minorities. It's not working pubs. They will not vote republican in any great numbers. Thread after post after thread of repubs/conservatives insulting minorities (and poor whites too), for getting free stuff doesn't fall on deaf ears.
 
Last edited:
You sorry assed bot...

>> The NAACP was formed partly in response to the continuing horrific practice of lynching and the 1908 race riot in Springfield, the capital of Illinois and resting place of President Abraham Lincoln. Appalled at the violence that was committed against blacks, a group of white liberals that included Mary White Ovington and Oswald Garrison Villard, both the descendants of abolitionists, William English Walling and Dr. Henry Moscowitz issued a call for a meeting to discuss racial justice. Some 60 people, seven of whom were African American (including W. E. B. Du Bois, Ida B. Wells-Barnett and Mary Church Terrell), signed the call, which was released on the centennial of Lincoln's birth. << (naacp.org)

Some were Republicans, duBois was a Socialist; some we don't know (or care) what party they may have been part of; they were liberals. Because that's what "all men are created equal" IS. But I doubt you have the mental dexterity to sniff the difference between Liberals and Democrats or figure out that it's not related to what party one belongs to.

You are really stretching the semantics here Pogo - the true definition of a Liberal indicates open mindedness , todays Liberals are perhaps the most closed minded people humanity has ever bred. But I have to applaud your post "to sniff the difference between Liberals and Democrats or figure out that it's not related to what party one belongs to."

Uh thanks -- I think.

Sounds like you're saying "I disagree with you but I agree with you". :confused:

If it's any clarification the point is that "liberalism" and "conservatism" are forces independent of "Democrats" and "Republicans". Which distinction is I think, based on reading his posts, a concept far beyond the OP's ken.

Yes basically I agree with you about 95%, but would add that when you boil it down to its lowest common denominator - Republicans are the lesser of two evils. In any event that was one of the best posts I've seen here in quite some time .
 
Last edited:
The names of the political parties can be twisted, and over the years some have changed and some have disappeared. What ever happened to the Federalist party, was it conservative or liberal? How about the Progressive party of Teddy Roosevelt or Whig party, liberal or conservative, and what of the Republican party of Thomas Jefferson, whatever happened to that? By the way, we usually capitalize the political party to indicate it's the party not the ideology.

Jefferson wasn't a republican.... There were not republicans then. He was a democrat republican and those no longer exist. So please keep showing us how ignorant you are of history and the truth.

Jefferson was both a Republican and a republican. The Jeffersonians took the name Republican changing it later to Democratic-Republicans. In our early period, democracy was not an OK political word. Democrats today trace their party back to Jefferson.
You really need to read history.
 
I'm going to let you in on a secret, you poor misled fool.

The Democratic Party is attempting to enslave everyone to the government, not just blacks.

This business about claiming Democrats are enslaving blacks is just a really, really stupid way of hiding the bigots infecting the Right.
You are a fool. Bigotryis something for you leftwing loons and girl you are a leftist. You can call your self a republican but it is in name only. All your posts prove daily you are a liberal not a conservative.

tapatalk post

You sorry assed bot...

>> The NAACP was formed partly in response to the continuing horrific practice of lynching and the 1908 race riot in Springfield, the capital of Illinois and resting place of President Abraham Lincoln. Appalled at the violence that was committed against blacks, a group of white liberals that included Mary White Ovington and Oswald Garrison Villard, both the descendants of abolitionists, William English Walling and Dr. Henry Moscowitz issued a call for a meeting to discuss racial justice. Some 60 people, seven of whom were African American (including W. E. B. Du Bois, Ida B. Wells-Barnett and Mary Church Terrell), signed the call, which was released on the centennial of Lincoln's birth. << (naacp.org)

Some were Republicans, duBois was a Socialist; some we don't know (or care) what party they may have been part of; they were liberals. Because that's what "all men are created equal" IS. But I doubt you have the mental dexterity to sniff the difference between Liberals and Democrats or figure out that it's not related to what party one belongs to.
It was created and formed by two REPUBLICANS .... You dont get to revise history because you want to hide your racism.
 
You are really stretching the semantics here Pogo - the true definition of a Liberal indicates open mindedness , todays Liberals are perhaps the most closed minded people humanity has ever bred. But I have to applaud your post "to sniff the difference between Liberals and Democrats or figure out that it's not related to what party one belongs to."

Uh thanks -- I think.

Sounds like you're saying "I disagree with you but I agree with you". :confused:

If it's any clarification the point is that "liberalism" and "conservatism" are forces independent of "Democrats" and "Republicans". Which distinction is I think, based on reading his posts, a concept far beyond the OP's ken.

Yes basically I agree with you about 95%, but would add that when you boil it down to its lowest common denominator - Republicans are the lesser of two evils. In any event that was one of the best posts I've seen here in quite some time .

Well thanks but still - "Republican" or "Democrat" is just an identifier of which power machine one attaches to. Ultimately it means little as a guide to a particular person or their ideology, which IMO is going to be far more determined by their context of place and, especially, time.
 
You are a fool. Bigotryis something for you leftwing loons and girl you are a leftist. You can call your self a republican but it is in name only. All your posts prove daily you are a liberal not a conservative.

tapatalk post

You sorry assed bot...

>> The NAACP was formed partly in response to the continuing horrific practice of lynching and the 1908 race riot in Springfield, the capital of Illinois and resting place of President Abraham Lincoln. Appalled at the violence that was committed against blacks, a group of white liberals that included Mary White Ovington and Oswald Garrison Villard, both the descendants of abolitionists, William English Walling and Dr. Henry Moscowitz issued a call for a meeting to discuss racial justice. Some 60 people, seven of whom were African American (including W. E. B. Du Bois, Ida B. Wells-Barnett and Mary Church Terrell), signed the call, which was released on the centennial of Lincoln's birth. << (naacp.org)

Some were Republicans, duBois was a Socialist; some we don't know (or care) what party they may have been part of; they were liberals. Because that's what "all men are created equal" IS. But I doubt you have the mental dexterity to sniff the difference between Liberals and Democrats or figure out that it's not related to what party one belongs to.
It was created and formed by two REPUBLICANS .... You dont get to revise history because you want to hide your racism.

Why don't you print this post out, set it on fire and cram it up your ass. And learn to count.
 
Last edited:
They have created a system of governmental dependency and generational welfare in the Black community and done more harm than good. look at the representation the Black community gets from people like Sheila Jackson Lee, Chuck Rangal and Jesse jr. Disgraceful.
 
You sorry assed bot...

>> The NAACP was formed partly in response to the continuing horrific practice of lynching and the 1908 race riot in Springfield, the capital of Illinois and resting place of President Abraham Lincoln. Appalled at the violence that was committed against blacks, a group of white liberals that included Mary White Ovington and Oswald Garrison Villard, both the descendants of abolitionists, William English Walling and Dr. Henry Moscowitz issued a call for a meeting to discuss racial justice. Some 60 people, seven of whom were African American (including W. E. B. Du Bois, Ida B. Wells-Barnett and Mary Church Terrell), signed the call, which was released on the centennial of Lincoln's birth. << (naacp.org)

Some were Republicans, duBois was a Socialist; some we don't know (or care) what party they may have been part of; they were liberals. Because that's what "all men are created equal" IS. But I doubt you have the mental dexterity to sniff the difference between Liberals and Democrats or figure out that it's not related to what party one belongs to.
It was created and formed by two REPUBLICANS .... You dont get to revise history because you want to hide your racism.

Why don't you print this post out, set it on fire and cram it up your ass.

Are you mad that you are caught in yet another lie?
 
They have created a system of governmental dependency and generational welfare in the Black community and done more harm than good. look at the representation the Black community gets from people like Sheila Jackson Lee, Chuck Rangal and Jesse jr. Disgraceful.

Walter Williams, economist, philosopher, columnist, professor at George Mason University, and Black Republican was interviewed by The Wall Street Journal and discussed research he conducted which led him to the conclusion that the government welfare state killed the black family, not slavery or racism.

Even .... when slaves often weren't permitted to wed, most black children lived with a biological mother and father. During Reconstruction and up until the 1940s, 75% to 85% of black children lived in two-parent families. Today, more than 70% of black children are born to single women. The welfare state has done to black Americans what slavery couldn't do, what Jim Crow couldn't do, what the harshest racism couldn't do,.... And that is to destroy the black family.
 
Pogo's Avatar
Pogo Pogo is offline
Dematerializing Catatonia
Member #41527

Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Carolinia Agresticia; the Forest Primeval
Posts: 20,708
Thanks: 9,234
Thanked 8,226 Times in 5,485 Posts
Mentioned: 240 Post(s)
Tagged: 4 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 20239
Pogo gives orders to the Illuminati Pogo gives orders to the Illuminati Pogo gives orders to the Illuminati
Pogo gives orders to the Illuminati Pogo gives orders to the Illuminati Pogo gives orders to the Illuminati Pogo gives orders to the Illuminati Pogo gives orders to the Illuminati Pogo gives orders to the Illuminati Pogo gives orders to the Illuminati
New reputation!
Hi, you have received -10119 reputation points from Pogo.
Reputation was given for this post.

Comment:
Blammo

Regards,
Pogo
This is how you know Pogo got caught in one of his many lies.
 
They have created a system of governmental dependency and generational welfare in the Black community and done more harm than good. look at the representation the Black community gets from people like Sheila Jackson Lee, Chuck Rangal and Jesse jr. Disgraceful.

Walter Williams, economist, philosopher, columnist, professor at George Mason University, and Black Republican was interviewed by The Wall Street Journal and discussed research he conducted which led him to the conclusion that the government welfare state killed the black family, not slavery or racism.

Even .... when slaves often weren't permitted to wed, most black children lived with a biological mother and father. During Reconstruction and up until the 1940s, 75% to 85% of black children lived in two-parent families. Today, more than 70% of black children are born to single women. The welfare state has done to black Americans what slavery couldn't do, what Jim Crow couldn't do, what the harshest racism couldn't do,.... And that is to destroy the black family.

You actually think "welfare" did that?

Actually I can't tell if this is a quote or your own post...
 
They have created a system of governmental dependency and generational welfare in the Black community and done more harm than good. look at the representation the Black community gets from people like Sheila Jackson Lee, Chuck Rangal and Jesse jr. Disgraceful.

Walter Williams, economist, philosopher, columnist, professor at George Mason University, and Black Republican was interviewed by The Wall Street Journal and discussed research he conducted which led him to the conclusion that the government welfare state killed the black family, not slavery or racism.

Even .... when slaves often weren't permitted to wed, most black children lived with a biological mother and father. During Reconstruction and up until the 1940s, 75% to 85% of black children lived in two-parent families. Today, more than 70% of black children are born to single women. The welfare state has done to black Americans what slavery couldn't do, what Jim Crow couldn't do, what the harshest racism couldn't do,.... And that is to destroy the black family.

You actually think "welfare" did that?

Actually I can't tell if this is a quote or your own post...
You going to ignore all truth anyway so why ask?
 
Pogo gives orders to the Illuminati Pogo gives orders to the Illuminati Pogo gives orders to the Illuminati
Pogo gives orders to the Illuminati Pogo gives orders to the Illuminati Pogo gives orders to the Illuminati Pogo gives orders to the Illuminati Pogo gives orders to the Illuminati Pogo gives orders to the Illuminati Pogo gives orders to the Illuminati
This is how you know Pogo got caught in one of his many lies.


Ahem. Hey stoopid:

because you want to hide your racism.

Fuck with the bull and you get the horn. Get my drift?

:eusa_boohoo:
 
During the Great Depression America's divorce rate dropped. For some that is evidence that families stayed together, but the reality is that the "poor man's divorce" became common because people couldn't afford divorce, the man just left. Look at the pictures of bread lines during the Great Depression, how many women are seen? It was also assumed that women had a greater chance of finding a job then men, adding to the problem. Poverty breaks up families.
 
During the Great Depression America's divorce rate dropped. For some that is evidence that families stayed together, but the reality is that the "poor man's divorce" became common because people couldn't afford divorce, the man just left. Look at the pictures of bread lines during the Great Depression, how many women are seen? It was also assumed that women had a greater chance of finding a job then men, adding to the problem. Poverty breaks up families.

Absolutely it does -- I believe cash flow is the number one causation of intramarital conflicts. Yet there are those here who would have us believe that too much money has the same effect as too little. Might be interesting for them to try to essplain that. In their own words rather than a script parroted from Newsmax.
 

Forum List

Back
Top