Do bigots have a right to exist?

[dblack]

You are allowed to be as bigotted as you want in your own home and own circle of friends

However once you enter the public arena and open a business, you are subject to all the rules and regulations. You may not like them, you may not agree with them....but you are still subject to them

And empty truism. Of course there are rules. We're discussing what they should be. Should government be used to squash unpopular opinions?

You are allowed any opinions you wish. You are also subject to ridicule because of them

As a business you are subject to ALL the rules. Fire codes, building codes, tax regulations, labor laws and even anti-discrimination laws.

"We don't serve n*ggers here" was an unpopular opinion and was squashed by the government. Same applys to gays

"We dont serve n*ggers here" wasnt an unpopular opinion. it was a policy. how can you have a debate when idiots cant be honest about anything?

It was both, at various times. We got rid of the laws and policies. Then we went after the opinion itself.

No,no,you still haven't gotten rid of the opinion .......................

Of course not, but that's what they're trying to do. And now, it's not just racists. This is becoming a general approach to governing, and we need to turn it around.

 

[dblack]

Ok bigots can't deny a service to the public if they own a business. How far should we prohibit them acting on those feelings? it seems to me that to completely bar a bigoted individual is to basically make being a bigot illegal since they can't apply those feelings in any aspect of their lives. It would have the same affect as saying banning being a bigot which would violate some portion of the first amendment.

You are allowed to be as bigotted as you want in your own home and own circle of friends

However once you enter the public arena and open a business, you are subject to all the rules and regulations. You may not like them, you may not agree with them....but you are still subject to them

And empty truism. Of course there are rules. We're discussing what they should be. Should government be used to squash unpopular opinions?

You are allowed any opinions you wish. You are also subject to ridicule because of them

As a business you are subject to ALL the rules. Fire codes, building codes, tax regulations, labor laws and even anti-discrimination laws.

Yeah, yeah, yeah. You keep repeating yourself. The question isn't whether people are subject to laws. It's what sorts of things laws should dictate. Should they tell us who we can associate with? Who we can like and dislike? Who we can favor and who we can shun?

"We don't serve n*ggers here" was an unpopular opinion and was squashed by the government. Same applys to gays

Exactly. Should we keep doing that? Should we use government to target unpopular biases for extinction?

Yes, we should use government to protect the rights of "We the People"
Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on whats for supper
We need someone to protect the sheep

Yep. Which is why understanding what rights are is so important. Do you think people have a right to be treated equally by businesses?

 

[Stephanie]

Of course bigots have a right to exist and to their bigoted opinions. They also now have the right to be relegated into the dustbins of history.

holy smokes. were you beating your chest when you typed that...good grief get over yourselves

No, why would I beat my chest? I'm stating a fact. Bigots get relegated to the dustbins of history.

omg. you're no better and you are just as much a bigot as the next person... Because you think you have the right to judge and LABEL others. . so clean out your dustbin

 

[DrDoomNGloom]

Ok bigots can't deny a service to the public if they own a business. How far should we prohibit them acting on those feelings? it seems to me that to completely bar a bigoted individual is to basically make being a bigot illegal since they can't apply those feelings in any aspect of their lives. It would have the same affect as saying banning being a bigot which would violate some portion of the first amendment.

You are allowed to be as bigotted as you want in your own home and own circle of friends

However once you enter the public arena and open a business, you are subject to all the rules and regulations. You may not like them, you may not agree with them....but you are still subject to them

And empty truism. Of course there are rules. We're discussing what they should be. Should government be used to squash unpopular opinions?

You are allowed any opinions you wish. You are also subject to ridicule because of them

As a business you are subject to ALL the rules. Fire codes, building codes, tax regulations, labor laws and even anti-discrimination laws.

"We don't serve n*ggers here" was an unpopular opinion and was squashed by the government. Same applies to gays

Look you little fucking faggot, you keep repeating that same moronic shit.

Just because it is law now, doesn't mean it can't be changed,at one time the temperance movement had alcohol outlawed.

Those laws are repealed and things have changed now.

You have to craft laws to make sure people treat you the way you think you should be, get a clue in life and figure out faggots are abominations of both God and society and while the libtards have you tolerated by law, it doesn't mean you are accepted.

But of course your faggot mentallity tells you that if you force others to go against their own moral values,you have won.

There has never been a time in history in which fags have been openly accepted, all cultures have driven homo sexuality out and ours will eventually follow the laws of the universe.

Unworthy of a response

But yet the faggot posted one...............

What a fucking ignorant moron ..................

 

[Seawytch]

Of course bigots have a right to exist and to their bigoted opinions. They also now have the right to be relegated into the dustbins of history.

holy smokes. were you beating your chest when you typed that...good grief get over yourselves

No, why would I beat my chest? I'm stating a fact. Bigots get relegated to the dustbins of history.

omg. you're no better and you are just as much a bigot as the next person... Because you think you have the right to judge and LABEL others. . so clean out your dustbin

I'm much better than a racist or anti gay bigot since my intolerance is directed at...intolerance.

Yes, I have a right to call an anti gay bigot an anti gay bigot just as much as they have a right to BE one.

 

[Edgetho]

I'm much better than a racist or anti gay bigot since my intolerance is directed at...intolerance.

Yes, I have a right to call an anti gay bigot an anti gay bigot just as much as they have a right to BE one.

Yes, you do.

But you do NOT have the 'right' to use the brute force power of a Thug State to force YOUR morality on others.

That makes you no better than those who forbade interracial marriage and other idiotic Jim Crow (aka; dimocrap) laws..... And just not in the South, snowflake. All over the Country.

How's it feel to be a Nazi? Liking it, huh......

Like the power, do you?

You better sit back and think about what power has done to you.... ALL of you

 

[Seawytch]

I'm much better than a racist or anti gay bigot since my intolerance is directed at...intolerance.

Yes, I have a right to call an anti gay bigot an anti gay bigot just as much as they have a right to BE one.

Yes, you do.

But you do NOT have the 'right' to use the brute force power of a Thug State to force YOUR morality on others.

That makes you no better than those who forbade interracial marriage and other idiotic Jim Crow (aka; dimocrap) laws..... And just not in the South, snowflake. All over the Country.

How's it feel to be a Nazi? Liking it, huh......

Like the power, do you?

You better sit back and think about what power has done to you.... ALL of you

Tiltle II of the Civil Rights Act...it's been in effect since 1964 on the Federal level. Gay protections are states laws..."states rights" guy.

 

[Katzndogz]

Anything that brings our simmering culture wars to a full boil, as hard as it will be to go through is necessary.

 

[rightwinger]

The bigots had a "last gasp" with interracial marriage too. You're seeing the death of the anti gay movement...they don't die quietly.

Very true

They only get "religious" when it comes to gays

Why would such a business serve at an atheist wedding?

 

[Edgetho]

Tiltle II of the Civil Rights Act...it's been in effect since 1964 on the Federal level. Gay protections are states laws..."states rights" guy.

You have no clue what you're talking about. None.

Nazi.

How about they just exterminate those who don't conform to your idea of morality? Bet you'd like that, huh?

 

[Stephanie]

Of course bigots have a right to exist and to their bigoted opinions. They also now have the right to be relegated into the dustbins of history.

holy smokes. were you beating your chest when you typed that...good grief get over yourselves

No, why would I beat my chest? I'm stating a fact. Bigots get relegated to the dustbins of history.

omg. you're no better and you are just as much a bigot as the next person... Because you think you have the right to judge and LABEL others. . so clean out your dustbin

I'm much better than a racist or anti gay bigot since my intolerance is directed at...intolerance.

Yes, I have a right to call an anti gay bigot an anti gay bigot just as much as they have a right to BE one.

ummhumm, what is the label/name you call people who are heterosexual?
so laugh all you want and think yourself better...but you're not... so sorry to burst your bubble

 

[DrDoomNGloom]

The bigots had a "last gasp" with interracial marriage too. You're seeing the death of the anti gay movement...they don't die quietly.

Very true

They only get "religious" when it comes to gays

Why would such a business serve at an atheist wedding?

Now see how fucking stupid you sound??

The answer is simple, the baker / photographer would object just as much as a GAY wedding and be well with in their rights to do so ...................

Simple, no cake at all ..................

 

[BlueGin]

Ok bigots can't deny a service to the public if they own a business. How far should we prohibit them acting on those feelings? it seems to me that to completely bar a bigoted individual is to basically make being a bigot illegal since they can't apply those feelings in any aspect of their lives. It would have the same affect as saying banning being a bigot which would violate some portion of the first amendment.

You are allowed to be as bigotted as you want in your own home and own circle of friends

However once you enter the public arena and open a business, you are subject to all the rules and regulations. You may not like them, you may not agree with them....but you are still subject to them

And empty truism. Of course there are rules. We're discussing what they should be. Should government be used to squash unpopular opinions?

You are allowed any opinions you wish. You are also subject to ridicule because of them

As a business you are subject to ALL the rules. Fire codes, building codes, tax regulations, labor laws and even anti-discrimination laws.

"We don't serve n*ggers here" was an unpopular opinion and was squashed by the government. Same applies to gays

Correction. Libs will assign you your opinions and then ridicule you based on fabrications due to their bigotry.

 

[Stephanie]

Ok bigots can't deny a service to the public if they own a business. How far should we prohibit them acting on those feelings? it seems to me that to completely bar a bigoted individual is to basically make being a bigot illegal since they can't apply those feelings in any aspect of their lives. It would have the same affect as saying banning being a bigot which would violate some portion of the first amendment.

You are allowed to be as bigotted as you want in your own home and own circle of friends

However once you enter the public arena and open a business, you are subject to all the rules and regulations. You may not like them, you may not agree with them....but you are still subject to them

And empty truism. Of course there are rules. We're discussing what they should be. Should government be used to squash unpopular opinions?

You are allowed any opinions you wish. You are also subject to ridicule because of them

As a business you are subject to ALL the rules. Fire codes, building codes, tax regulations, labor laws and even anti-discrimination laws.

"We don't serve n*ggers here" was an unpopular opinion and was squashed by the government. Same applies to gays

Correction. Libs will assign you your opinions and then ridicule you based on fabrications due to their bigotry.

It's a sick thing they believe they are entitled to do

Middle America must be busting a gut at them right now. well really all the time

 

[rightwinger]

Ok bigots can't deny a service to the public if they own a business. How far should we prohibit them acting on those feelings? it seems to me that to completely bar a bigoted individual is to basically make being a bigot illegal since they can't apply those feelings in any aspect of their lives. It would have the same affect as saying banning being a bigot which would violate some portion of the first amendment.

You are allowed to be as bigotted as you want in your own home and own circle of friends

However once you enter the public arena and open a business, you are subject to all the rules and regulations. You may not like them, you may not agree with them....but you are still subject to them

And empty truism. Of course there are rules. We're discussing what they should be. Should government be used to squash unpopular opinions?

You are allowed any opinions you wish. You are also subject to ridicule because of them

As a business you are subject to ALL the rules. Fire codes, building codes, tax regulations, labor laws and even anti-discrimination laws.

"We don't serve n*ggers here" was an unpopular opinion and was squashed by the government. Same applies to gays

Correction. Libs will assign you your opinions and then ridicule you based on fabrications due to their bigotry.

We have found the ridicule of bigots to be a very effective tool

 

[AvgGuyIA]

Usually the ones screaming "bigot" are in reality the true bigots

Each of these Businesses run by Christians have never said they won't serve gays, Gays are not barred from their establishments.

 

[AvgGuyIA]

Of course bigots have a right to exist and to their bigoted opinions. They also now have the right to be relegated into the dustbins of history.

Gays are welcome to buy a cake from Christians. You can't demand they serve it to you at your gay wedding.

 

[AvgGuyIA]

We have found the ridicule of bigots to be a very effective tool

Ridicule? It's more like death threats to people who are not bigots. It's your kind that are bigots with your hatred of Christianity.

 

[rightwinger]

We have found the ridicule of bigots to be a very effective tool

Ridicule? It's more like death threats to people who are not bigots. It's your kind that are bigots with your hatred of Christianity.

Death threats are always unacceptable

They deserve the full protection of the police just like anyone else would receive

 

[BlueGin]

Ok bigots can't deny a service to the public if they own a business. How far should we prohibit them acting on those feelings? it seems to me that to completely bar a bigoted individual is to basically make being a bigot illegal since they can't apply those feelings in any aspect of their lives. It would have the same affect as saying banning being a bigot which would violate some portion of the first amendment.

You are allowed to be as bigotted as you want in your own home and own circle of friends

However once you enter the public arena and open a business, you are subject to all the rules and regulations. You may not like them, you may not agree with them....but you are still subject to them

And empty truism. Of course there are rules. We're discussing what they should be. Should government be used to squash unpopular opinions?

You are allowed any opinions you wish. You are also subject to ridicule because of them

As a business you are subject to ALL the rules. Fire codes, building codes, tax regulations, labor laws and even anti-discrimination laws.

"We don't serve n*ggers here" was an unpopular opinion and was squashed by the government. Same applies to gays

Correction. Libs will assign you your opinions and then ridicule you based on fabrications due to their bigotry.

We have found the ridicule of bigots to be a very effective tool

In liberal speak...that means anyone that doesn't agree with me.