- Thread starter
- #81
In 2004 when John Kerry said he was for the 87 billion before he was against it, Republicans took that totally out of context and got plenty of mileage out of it.
Now, it's just Romney's turn in the barrel.
Actually it gave us insight to his personality.
He was against something but he was trying to take credit for being for it.
No. You're ignorant of the true story too.
He was for it when the bill included provisions to PAY for the 87 billion. Bush vowed to veto the bill if those provisions were in it.
I know the story behind it....but Kerry was trying to take credit for it. He was being honest about what he did and yet dishonest, and it blew up in his face. You can't be for and against something at the same time.......unless you're a politician.
The difference here is we used Kerry's words against him whereas you and others are attempting to change what Romney said. Attempting to tweak his words to suit your purposes.
Last edited: