Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
except that adoptions were said to be the topic from day 1. it got muddy after that cause the left can't make this clear. if it was clear people would see there's not much to it.
Turned out there was no dirt from this meeting. And even if there were dirt, getting dirt is perfectly legal.except that adoptions were said to be the topic from day 1. it got muddy after that cause the left can't make this clear. if it was clear people would see there's not much to it.
they denied it being about dirt and claimed it was about "adoptions" like it was nothing.
in fact is was about obtaining political dirt, from government agents....
and it was ALSO about "adoptions" and that is A BIG DEAL, not flippantly "no big deal" just cuz it isn't about political dirt, because it was about quid pro quo relief from sanctions.
team trump and their apologists are truly dumber than dirt...
and they claimed that at the time so there is no revisionist history. and from what i recall this topic was brought up anyway, just not a major point. i've also never heard anyone deny it was about dirt. i've heard it's a crime for trump to do it but hillary can buy dirt all day long and farm it with a nuclear john deere and the left just doesn't give a shit.except that adoptions were said to be the topic from day 1. it got muddy after that cause the left can't make this clear. if it was clear people would see there's not much to it.
they denied it being about political dirt and claimed it was about "adoptions" like it was nothing.
in fact is was about obtaining political dirt, from government agents....
and it was ALSO about "adoptions" and that is A BIG DEAL, not flippantly "no big deal" just cuz it isn't about political dirt, because it was about quid pro quo relief from sanctions.
gawd, team trump and their apologists are truly dumber than dirt...
Apparently had the Trump campaign hired an operations research firm that coordinated through a British agent to get dirt from the Russian Lawyer, everything would be A-OK.and they claimed that at the time so there is no revisionist history. and from what i recall this topic was brought up anyway, just not a major point. i've also never heard anyone deny it was about dirt. i've heard it's a crime for trump to do it but hillary can buy dirt all day long and farm it with a nuclear john deere and the left just doesn't give a shit.except that adoptions were said to be the topic from day 1. it got muddy after that cause the left can't make this clear. if it was clear people would see there's not much to it.
they denied it being about political dirt and claimed it was about "adoptions" like it was nothing.
in fact is was about obtaining political dirt, from government agents....
and it was ALSO about "adoptions" and that is A BIG DEAL, not flippantly "no big deal" just cuz it isn't about political dirt, because it was about quid pro quo relief from sanctions.
gawd, team trump and their apologists are truly dumber than dirt...
so when you judge both sides equally, you have a point. when you forgive your side while demonizing the other - you get our jacked up world we have today.
so when you judge both sides equally, you have a point. when you forgive your side while demonizing the other - you get our jacked up world we have today.
So the argument is that the DNC…who was hacked by the Russians at least once…was now in Trumpworld….colluding with the Russians?
Interesting theory. It’s total bullshit of course.
How do you know the DNC was hacked by the Russians since they didn't cooperate with the investigation? Sounds like fake news
Still remember Obama's statement "After the election I will be able to be more flexible".? Gee wonder what he metRinat Akhmetshin is a name we should have heard a lot of but we didn't. This guy seems to be in the middle of everything. He even has ties to Fusion GPS Sen. Chuck Grassley has accused Fusion GPS, which admits it was behind the Steele dossier, of being an unregistered Russian agent because of its work with the Russians lobbying against Magnitsky, including Akhmetshin and Veselnitskaya.
Rinat Akhmetshin: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know | Heavy.com
Was the Trump dossier written by a Russian? Perhaps Rinat Akhmetshin.
The Trump Dossier Is Fake -- And Here Are The Reasons Why
In any case I think it is clear that Rinat Akhmetshin should be getting some serious news media attention. There are only two possibilities, he is working for the CIA or he is a Russian spy sent to help half the country take down Trump.
Either way, the Left wing media has not interest, nor does the Left winged Federal government.
If the Media had the REAL INTEREST in Russia tampering in our elections to look into ALL aspects of it, by the time they were done investigating all connections with the Obama people, they'd have no time left to worry about Trump. It was Obama that dismissed Russia in 2012, then went on to do NOTHING about them right through 2016. In 2016 when the election was taking place, Trump was just an unpopular candidate then, with big hands.
OOOO - the old "nuh uh!" defense! most major outlets are fake in some way anymore. to sit and pretend only side does it is for people not mentally old enough to outwit a tootsie pop.
^ typical leftist bullshit. call someone stupid and pretend they don't understand so you can keep your "high ground" of superiority even if in only your own mind.so when you judge both sides equally, you have a point. when you forgive your side while demonizing the other - you get our jacked up world we have today.
^ simpleton rubbish ignoring the LEGAL facts of the matter
^ typicalleftistbullshit. call someone stupid and pretend they don't understand so you can keep your "high ground" of superiority even if in only your own mind.
OOOO - the old "nuh uh!" defense! ... to sit and pretend only side does it is for people not mentally old enough to outwit a tootsie pop.
Do you really think the Mueller Special Counsel and FBI has only an uncorroborated Dossier???Rinat Akhmetshin is a name we should have heard a lot of but we didn't. This guy seems to be in the middle of everything. He even has ties to Fusion GPS Sen. Chuck Grassley has accused Fusion GPS, which admits it was behind the Steele dossier, of being an unregistered Russian agent because of its work with the Russians lobbying against Magnitsky, including Akhmetshin and Veselnitskaya.
Rinat Akhmetshin: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know | Heavy.com
Was the Trump dossier written by a Russian? Perhaps Rinat Akhmetshin.
The Trump Dossier Is Fake -- And Here Are The Reasons Why
In any case I think it is clear that Rinat Akhmetshin should be getting some serious news media attention. There are only two possibilities, he is working for the CIA or he is a Russian spy sent to help half the country take down Trump.
Either way, the Left wing media has not interest, nor does the Left winged Federal government.
like i said - so far you've not shown an ability to talk over the issues, just mock people who are.^ typicalleftistbullshit. call someone stupid and pretend they don't understand so you can keep your "high ground" of superiority even if in only your own mind.
huh?
OOOO - the old "nuh uh!" defense! ... to sit and pretend only side does it is for people not mentally old enough to outwit a tootsie pop.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
So the argument is that the DNC…who was hacked by the Russians at least once…was now in Trumpworld….colluding with the Russians?
Interesting theory. It’s total bullshit of course.
How do you know the DNC was hacked by the Russians since they didn't cooperate with the investigation? Sounds like fake news
DHS, CIA, ONI says so.
Rinat Akhmetshin is a name we should have heard a lot of but we didn't. This guy seems to be in the middle of everything. He even has ties to Fusion GPS Sen. Chuck Grassley has accused Fusion GPS, which admits it was behind the Steele dossier, of being an unregistered Russian agent because of its work with the Russians lobbying against Magnitsky, including Akhmetshin and Veselnitskaya.
Rinat Akhmetshin: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know | Heavy.com
Was the Trump dossier written by a Russian? Perhaps Rinat Akhmetshin.
The Trump Dossier Is Fake -- And Here Are The Reasons Why
In any case I think it is clear that Rinat Akhmetshin should be getting some serious news media attention. There are only two possibilities, he is working for the CIA or he is a Russian spy sent to help half the country take down Trump.
Either way, the Left wing media has not interest, nor does the Left winged Federal government.
Rinat Akhmetshin is a name we should have heard a lot of but we didn't. This guy seems to be in the middle of everything. He even has ties to Fusion GPS Sen. Chuck Grassley has accused Fusion GPS, which admits it was behind the Steele dossier, of being an unregistered Russian agent because of its work with the Russians lobbying against Magnitsky, including Akhmetshin and Veselnitskaya.
Rinat Akhmetshin: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know | Heavy.com
Was the Trump dossier written by a Russian? Perhaps Rinat Akhmetshin.
The Trump Dossier Is Fake -- And Here Are The Reasons Why
In any case I think it is clear that Rinat Akhmetshin should be getting some serious news media attention. There are only two possibilities, he is working for the CIA or he is a Russian spy sent to help half the country take down Trump.
Either way, the Left wing media has not interest, nor does the Left winged Federal government.
"no collusion" "collusion is not a crime" "but they did collusion too!" derrrrrp
Both Campaigns Sought Russian Dirt. Clinton's Way Was Legal.
Rinat Akhmetshin is a name we should have heard a lot of but we didn't. This guy seems to be in the middle of everything. He even has ties to Fusion GPS Sen. Chuck Grassley has accused Fusion GPS, which admits it was behind the Steele dossier, of being an unregistered Russian agent because of its work with the Russians lobbying against Magnitsky, including Akhmetshin and Veselnitskaya.
Rinat Akhmetshin: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know | Heavy.com
Was the Trump dossier written by a Russian? Perhaps Rinat Akhmetshin.
The Trump Dossier Is Fake -- And Here Are The Reasons Why
In any case I think it is clear that Rinat Akhmetshin should be getting some serious news media attention. There are only two possibilities, he is working for the CIA or he is a Russian spy sent to help half the country take down Trump.
Either way, the Left wing media has not interest, nor does the Left winged Federal government.
"no collusion" "collusion is not a crime" "but they did collusion too!" derrrrrp
Both Campaigns Sought Russian Dirt. Clinton's Way Was Legal.
Both Campaigns Sought Russian Dirt. Clinton's Way Was Legal
Do you not understand the difference between LEGAL and ILLEGAL?
Fox News host wrong that no law bans Russia-Trump collusion
https://lawandcrime.com/politics/ab...foreign-nationals-to-influence-u-s-elections/
Federal election law, administered by the Federal Election Commission, prohibits contributions, donations and other expenditures by “foreign nationals” in any federal, state or local election as well an exchange of any “thing of value.” Most recently, Section 303 of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002, also known as the McCain-Feingold Act, strengthened the ban on foreign money in U.S. electioneering.
Six years ago, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld a decision by a U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C., that Congress can ban individuals who lawfully reside in the U.S. and are neither U.S. citizens nor “permanent residents” from making donations or gifts related to any election. In that case, Bluman v. Federal Election Commission, a three-judge panel said the limitation was a legitimate tool for government to prevent “foreign influence over U.S. elections.” The decision specifically banned contributions to candidates and political parties as well as “express-advocacy” expenditures — those ads that clearly support or oppose a specific electoral outcome. The Supreme Court affirmed the decision without comment.
You're treating them as being interested in truth, when their argument is based on Fusion GPS being a lobbyist or agent of transferring information from a govt to a campaign.Rinat Akhmetshin is a name we should have heard a lot of but we didn't. This guy seems to be in the middle of everything. He even has ties to Fusion GPS Sen. Chuck Grassley has accused Fusion GPS, which admits it was behind the Steele dossier, of being an unregistered Russian agent because of its work with the Russians lobbying against Magnitsky, including Akhmetshin and Veselnitskaya.
Rinat Akhmetshin: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know | Heavy.com
Was the Trump dossier written by a Russian? Perhaps Rinat Akhmetshin.
The Trump Dossier Is Fake -- And Here Are The Reasons Why
In any case I think it is clear that Rinat Akhmetshin should be getting some serious news media attention. There are only two possibilities, he is working for the CIA or he is a Russian spy sent to help half the country take down Trump.
Either way, the Left wing media has not interest, nor does the Left winged Federal government.
"no collusion" "collusion is not a crime" "but they did collusion too!" derrrrrp
Both Campaigns Sought Russian Dirt. Clinton's Way Was Legal.
Both Campaigns Sought Russian Dirt. Clinton's Way Was Legal
Do you not understand the difference between LEGAL and ILLEGAL?
Fox News host wrong that no law bans Russia-Trump collusion
https://lawandcrime.com/politics/ab...foreign-nationals-to-influence-u-s-elections/
Federal election law, administered by the Federal Election Commission, prohibits contributions, donations and other expenditures by “foreign nationals” in any federal, state or local election as well an exchange of any “thing of value.” Most recently, Section 303 of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002, also known as the McCain-Feingold Act, strengthened the ban on foreign money in U.S. electioneering.
Six years ago, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld a decision by a U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C., that Congress can ban individuals who lawfully reside in the U.S. and are neither U.S. citizens nor “permanent residents” from making donations or gifts related to any election. In that case, Bluman v. Federal Election Commission, a three-judge panel said the limitation was a legitimate tool for government to prevent “foreign influence over U.S. elections.” The decision specifically banned contributions to candidates and political parties as well as “express-advocacy” expenditures — those ads that clearly support or oppose a specific electoral outcome. The Supreme Court affirmed the decision without comment.
