Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Still waiting for that link and quote to Nixon being considered for impeachment because he fired an appointee.Hillary never lied to the FBI, the FBI specifically said she told the truth for all of their questions in their interrogation of her.May I remind you that in merely 6 months time, there have been 4 Felony indictments and guilty pleas so far.... he's actually ahead of other Special Counsel investigations on finding criminal activities and getting plea deals in exchange for information needed to proceed further....This is nothing like Watergate or Clinton's lies about blow jobs. In those cases there was tons of evidence. It was irrefutable in the case of Clinton. There isn't a shred of evidence to support any changes against Trump. None.
Why are you Trumpettes disparaging the investigation instead of wanting the investigations on the Russians to continue?
What are you afraid of them finding???
Is there SOMETHING to hide?
None of those indictements have anything to do with "collusion." They are all for process crimes - stuff like lying to the FBI, which Hillary should be in jail for right now.
you realize by now that not a single one of the trumptards has ever let facts get in the way of their spew
Did the FBI keep a transcript or tape of their interviews with HRC in 2016?Hillary never lied to the FBI, the FBI specifically said she told the truth for all of their questions in their interrogation of her.May I remind you that in merely 6 months time, there have been 4 Felony indictments and guilty pleas so far.... he's actually ahead of other Special Counsel investigations on finding criminal activities and getting plea deals in exchange for information needed to proceed further....Any talk about impeachment, at least at this point, is premature, though as said previously. an impeachment is a political process and not one held to a criminal standard by the criminal Justice System imo....Or perhaps because there is nowhere enough to convince congress to impeach trump. Were articles of impeachment tabled this week?
It took 2 yrs investigating before Nixon drafted Articles of Impeachment were done...
It took 4 yrs of investigations with kenneth Starr, before Clinton was impeached.
So, this is truly, at a beginning stage and there are already 4 felony indictments/ guilty pleas.
Tricky Dick, and Hillary could end up looking like Saints when this is said and done, or....maybe not?
This is nothing like Watergate or Clinton's lies about blow jobs. In those cases there was tons of evidence. It was irrefutable in the case of Clinton. There isn't a shred of evidence to support any changes against Trump. None.
Why are you Trumpettes disparaging the investigation instead of wanting the investigations on the Russians to continue?
What are you afraid of them finding???
Is there SOMETHING to hide?
None of those indictements have anything to do with "collusion." They are all for process crimes - stuff like lying to the FBI, which Hillary should be in jail for right now.
Nothing in the articles says anything about Nixon firing anyone or YOU would be bale to quote it.Still waiting for that link and quote to Nixon being considered for impeachment because he fired an appointee.Hillary never lied to the FBI, the FBI specifically said she told the truth for all of their questions in their interrogation of her.May I remind you that in merely 6 months time, there have been 4 Felony indictments and guilty pleas so far.... he's actually ahead of other Special Counsel investigations on finding criminal activities and getting plea deals in exchange for information needed to proceed further....
Why are you Trumpettes disparaging the investigation instead of wanting the investigations on the Russians to continue?
What are you afraid of them finding???
Is there SOMETHING to hide?
None of those indictements have anything to do with "collusion." They are all for process crimes - stuff like lying to the FBI, which Hillary should be in jail for right now.
you realize by now that not a single one of the trumptards has ever let facts get in the way of their spew
are you really that stupid or that insane?
I guess you weren't capable of reading the articles of impeachment, eh?
I think you need to go find something else to do. you're embarrassing yourself terribly. go away and save what little of your dignity is left.
No they made no tape and took no notes just so they would not have to be caught letting her lie.Did the FBI keep a transcript or tape of their interviews with HRC in 2016?Hillary never lied to the FBI, the FBI specifically said she told the truth for all of their questions in their interrogation of her.May I remind you that in merely 6 months time, there have been 4 Felony indictments and guilty pleas so far.... he's actually ahead of other Special Counsel investigations on finding criminal activities and getting plea deals in exchange for information needed to proceed further....Any talk about impeachment, at least at this point, is premature, though as said previously. an impeachment is a political process and not one held to a criminal standard by the criminal Justice System imo....
It took 2 yrs investigating before Nixon drafted Articles of Impeachment were done...
It took 4 yrs of investigations with kenneth Starr, before Clinton was impeached.
So, this is truly, at a beginning stage and there are already 4 felony indictments/ guilty pleas.
Tricky Dick, and Hillary could end up looking like Saints when this is said and done, or....maybe not?
This is nothing like Watergate or Clinton's lies about blow jobs. In those cases there was tons of evidence. It was irrefutable in the case of Clinton. There isn't a shred of evidence to support any changes against Trump. None.
Why are you Trumpettes disparaging the investigation instead of wanting the investigations on the Russians to continue?
What are you afraid of them finding???
Is there SOMETHING to hide?
None of those indictements have anything to do with "collusion." They are all for process crimes - stuff like lying to the FBI, which Hillary should be in jail for right now.
So the president is above the law ?
Why do people think that HRC needed a private server set up ??? For the very reasons people are talking about here.No they made no tape and took no notes just so they would not have to be caught letting her lie.Did the FBI keep a transcript or tape of their interviews with HRC in 2016?Hillary never lied to the FBI, the FBI specifically said she told the truth for all of their questions in their interrogation of her.May I remind you that in merely 6 months time, there have been 4 Felony indictments and guilty pleas so far.... he's actually ahead of other Special Counsel investigations on finding criminal activities and getting plea deals in exchange for information needed to proceed further....This is nothing like Watergate or Clinton's lies about blow jobs. In those cases there was tons of evidence. It was irrefutable in the case of Clinton. There isn't a shred of evidence to support any changes against Trump. None.
Why are you Trumpettes disparaging the investigation instead of wanting the investigations on the Russians to continue?
What are you afraid of them finding???
Is there SOMETHING to hide?
None of those indictements have anything to do with "collusion." They are all for process crimes - stuff like lying to the FBI, which Hillary should be in jail for right now.
Let me remind you, Mueller's authorization includes the following phrase, "any matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigation". This phrase authorizes Mueller to follow any evidence of criminal activity uncovered in the course of the investigation. Even without such authorization, Mueller could no more refuse to investigate evidence of criminal activity, than a traffic cop could ignore a bloody body in the back of car during a traffic stop.May I remind you that in merely 6 months time, there have been 4 Felony indictments and guilty pleas so far.... he's actually ahead of other Special Counsel investigations on finding criminal activities and getting plea deals in exchange for information needed to proceed further....Any talk about impeachment, at least at this point, is premature, though as said previously. an impeachment is a political process and not one held to a criminal standard by the criminal Justice System imo....Or perhaps because there is nowhere enough to convince congress to impeach trump. Were articles of impeachment tabled this week?Because there is much much more to find out...a good poker player does not show his hand.
This investigation on the Russians, interference in our election and Social Media, and Russian money laundering is bigger than President Trump... it does not end with Trump.., he's a byproduct imo, and maybe even unwittingly....just don't know yet
It took 2 yrs investigating before Nixon drafted Articles of Impeachment were done...
It took 4 yrs of investigations with kenneth Starr, before Clinton was impeached.
So, this is truly, at a beginning stage and there are already 4 felony indictments/ guilty pleas.
Tricky Dick, and Hillary could end up looking like Saints when this is said and done, or....maybe not?
This is nothing like Watergate or Clinton's lies about blow jobs. In those cases there was tons of evidence. It was irrefutable in the case of Clinton. There isn't a shred of evidence to support any changes against Trump. None.
Why are you Trumpettes disparaging the investigation instead of wanting the investigations on the Russians to continue?
What are you afraid of them finding???
Is there SOMETHING to hide?
None of those indictements have anything to do with "collusion." They are all for process crimes - stuff like lying to the FBI, which Hillary should be in jail for right now.
The FBI keeps transcripts of all interviews. They rarely make them available except in court proceedings. You can be sure the Bureau covers their ass in documentation of everything they do and much of what they don't do.Did the FBI keep a transcript or tape of their interviews with HRC in 2016?Hillary never lied to the FBI, the FBI specifically said she told the truth for all of their questions in their interrogation of her.May I remind you that in merely 6 months time, there have been 4 Felony indictments and guilty pleas so far.... he's actually ahead of other Special Counsel investigations on finding criminal activities and getting plea deals in exchange for information needed to proceed further....Any talk about impeachment, at least at this point, is premature, though as said previously. an impeachment is a political process and not one held to a criminal standard by the criminal Justice System imo....
It took 2 yrs investigating before Nixon drafted Articles of Impeachment were done...
It took 4 yrs of investigations with kenneth Starr, before Clinton was impeached.
So, this is truly, at a beginning stage and there are already 4 felony indictments/ guilty pleas.
Tricky Dick, and Hillary could end up looking like Saints when this is said and done, or....maybe not?
This is nothing like Watergate or Clinton's lies about blow jobs. In those cases there was tons of evidence. It was irrefutable in the case of Clinton. There isn't a shred of evidence to support any changes against Trump. None.
Why are you Trumpettes disparaging the investigation instead of wanting the investigations on the Russians to continue?
What are you afraid of them finding???
Is there SOMETHING to hide?
None of those indictements have anything to do with "collusion." They are all for process crimes - stuff like lying to the FBI, which Hillary should be in jail for right now.
The FBI keeps transcripts of all interviews. They rarely make them available except in court proceedings. You can be sure the Bureau covers their ass in documentation of everything they do and much of what they don't do.Did the FBI keep a transcript or tape of their interviews with HRC in 2016?Hillary never lied to the FBI, the FBI specifically said she told the truth for all of their questions in their interrogation of her.May I remind you that in merely 6 months time, there have been 4 Felony indictments and guilty pleas so far.... he's actually ahead of other Special Counsel investigations on finding criminal activities and getting plea deals in exchange for information needed to proceed further....This is nothing like Watergate or Clinton's lies about blow jobs. In those cases there was tons of evidence. It was irrefutable in the case of Clinton. There isn't a shred of evidence to support any changes against Trump. None.
Why are you Trumpettes disparaging the investigation instead of wanting the investigations on the Russians to continue?
What are you afraid of them finding???
Is there SOMETHING to hide?
None of those indictements have anything to do with "collusion." They are all for process crimes - stuff like lying to the FBI, which Hillary should be in jail for right now.
She was their queen..yup they protected Hillary from being caught in a lie by not taking notes or filming it can any democrat name any republican treated that way?
What testimony are you speaking of? The FBI does interviews? Clinton testified before congress.The FBI keeps transcripts of all interviews. They rarely make them available except in court proceedings. You can be sure the Bureau covers their ass in documentation of everything they do and much of what they don't do.Did the FBI keep a transcript or tape of their interviews with HRC in 2016?Hillary never lied to the FBI, the FBI specifically said she told the truth for all of their questions in their interrogation of her.May I remind you that in merely 6 months time, there have been 4 Felony indictments and guilty pleas so far.... he's actually ahead of other Special Counsel investigations on finding criminal activities and getting plea deals in exchange for information needed to proceed further....
Why are you Trumpettes disparaging the investigation instead of wanting the investigations on the Russians to continue?
What are you afraid of them finding???
Is there SOMETHING to hide?
None of those indictements have anything to do with "collusion." They are all for process crimes - stuff like lying to the FBI, which Hillary should be in jail for right now.
Comey has already stated they didn't make a transcript of Hillary's testimony. If they did then Republicans in Congress could go over it with a fine toothed comb and easily find instances where she lied to the FBI. That's how they FBI is covering its ass.
Did they film General Fynn when they interrogated him?yup they protected Hillary from being caught in a lie by not taking notes or filming it can any democrat name any republican treated that way?
. They need to be transparent period.Did they film General Fynn when they interrogated him?yup they protected Hillary from being caught in a lie by not taking notes or filming it can any democrat name any republican treated that way?
They took notes retard remind me what law enforcement group does not take notes when deposing someone accused of suspected of or being investigated for wrong doing?Did they film General Fynn when they interrogated him?yup they protected Hillary from being caught in a lie by not taking notes or filming it can any democrat name any republican treated that way?
WHAT they do is investigate first with testimony from others all along the way, like with the Clinton investigation, or research on the target they are going to interrogate, like with Flynn, BEFORE they call them in to ask them questions, questions the FBI already knows the answers to....They took notes retard remind me what law enforcement group does not take notes when deposing someone accused of suspected of or being investigated for wrong doing?Did they film General Fynn when they interrogated him?yup they protected Hillary from being caught in a lie by not taking notes or filming it can any democrat name any republican treated that way?
The investigation was over a month to a month and a half before they talked to her (HRC)! Hmmmmmmmmmmmm!WHAT they do is investigate first with testimony from others all along the way, like with the Clinton investigation, or research on the target they are going to interrogate, like with Flynn, BEFORE they call them in to ask them questions, questions the FBI already knows the answers to....They took notes retard remind me what law enforcement group does not take notes when deposing someone accused of suspected of or being investigated for wrong doing?Did they film General Fynn when they interrogated him?yup they protected Hillary from being caught in a lie by not taking notes or filming it can any democrat name any republican treated that way?
Flynn chose to lie to the FBI when questioned.
Clinton chose not to lie to the FBI when questioned.
We haven't seen any FBI transcripts on the questioning of Flynn either, nor did we see them on Petraeus who was charged as well, with lying to the FBI...no video and no transcripts....
Clinton was not treated any differently than the others, plus she did not lie to them....
her situation was different though, because the investigation on the server and email was already over, they had completed it the month or month and a half before they called her in as the last interview....they ALREADY KNEW that she was not going to be charged due to all of their other interviews with all of her staff and their investigation of it all....
Whereas Flynn's questioning by the FBI and his lying to them, is what lead to a bigger and more encompassing criminal /counter intelligence investigation on him.
All but the fiinal interview.... they had already spent a year plus, getting her server, searching her server and other devices of her staff and herself, worked with her computer guy, found there were no breaches by the russians and other enemies on her server, found none.... etc etc etcThe investigation was over a month to a month and a half before they talked to her (HRC)! Hmmmmmmmmmmmm!WHAT they do is investigate first with testimony from others all along the way, like with the Clinton investigation, or research on the target they are going to interrogate, like with Flynn, BEFORE they call them in to ask them questions, questions the FBI already knows the answers to....They took notes retard remind me what law enforcement group does not take notes when deposing someone accused of suspected of or being investigated for wrong doing?Did they film General Fynn when they interrogated him?yup they protected Hillary from being caught in a lie by not taking notes or filming it can any democrat name any republican treated that way?
Flynn chose to lie to the FBI when questioned.
Clinton chose not to lie to the FBI when questioned.
We haven't seen any FBI transcripts on the questioning of Flynn either, nor did we see them on Petraeus who was charged as well, with lying to the FBI...no video and no transcripts....
Clinton was not treated any differently than the others, plus she did not lie to them....
her situation was different though, because the investigation on the server and email was already over, they had completed it the month or month and a half before they called her in as the last interview....they ALREADY KNEW that she was not going to be charged due to all of their other interviews with all of her staff and their investigation of it all....
Whereas Flynn's questioning by the FBI and his lying to them, is what lead to a bigger and more encompassing criminal /counter intelligence investigation on him.
And yet no transcript of her questioning exists they did not take a single note during it.All but the fiinal interview.... they had already spent a year plus, getting her server, searching her server and other devices of her staff and herself, worked with her computer guy, found there were no breaches by the russians and other enemies on her server, found none.... etc etc etcThe investigation was over a month to a month and a half before they talked to her (HRC)! Hmmmmmmmmmmmm!WHAT they do is investigate first with testimony from others all along the way, like with the Clinton investigation, or research on the target they are going to interrogate, like with Flynn, BEFORE they call them in to ask them questions, questions the FBI already knows the answers to....They took notes retard remind me what law enforcement group does not take notes when deposing someone accused of suspected of or being investigated for wrong doing?Did they film General Fynn when they interrogated him?yup they protected Hillary from being caught in a lie by not taking notes or filming it can any democrat name any republican treated that way?
Flynn chose to lie to the FBI when questioned.
Clinton chose not to lie to the FBI when questioned.
We haven't seen any FBI transcripts on the questioning of Flynn either, nor did we see them on Petraeus who was charged as well, with lying to the FBI...no video and no transcripts....
Clinton was not treated any differently than the others, plus she did not lie to them....
her situation was different though, because the investigation on the server and email was already over, they had completed it the month or month and a half before they called her in as the last interview....they ALREADY KNEW that she was not going to be charged due to all of their other interviews with all of her staff and their investigation of it all....
Whereas Flynn's questioning by the FBI and his lying to them, is what lead to a bigger and more encompassing criminal /counter intelligence investigation on him.
What is it exactly that you are so enraged about...
she wasn't a spy, she did not commit espionage, she did not collude with the enemy, she didn't get her opponents emails stolen or direct the way the russians released them...
NADA
Yet you unamericans kept shouting LOCK HER UP, for bull crap technical reasons...
she didn't do anything to harm us intentionally nor did we get harmed, yet you have this president who has done nothing but put our nation down and in to the ground for the russians, for Wall street and for his greedy self..... LOCK HIM UP.....how's that sound? lock him up lock him up lock him up...
Wow, that was so much fun!
