Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Republicans should bring it up when Kerry runs for reelection
Democrats are sure going to bring it up with Romney ( But so is Newt)
(But that was then, when "Greed (and Capitalism) was good" and John Kerry was the anti military, military antidote to the Presidency of the slacker George W Bush. Didn't Dan Rather, Mary Mapes and CBS tell us it was so. But today after this nights SOTU speech Kerry's tax rate is not to be mentioned, because Obama will tonight charge his followers to seek out those among their neighbors who have better jobs, nicer houses, bigger bank accounts, newer and more expensive cars and to immediately start throwing molotov cocktails through their windows, slit the throats of their children as they wait for the school buses in the morning and rape their wives as they leave to shop for the family groceries. The Great Democratic Uniter as extolled during the 2008 campaign, is finally going to bring this nation together in a mass orgy of envy, jealously, murder, fire, conflict, and destruction of property.)
"In 2004, John Kerry and his wife released portions of their separate tax returns that showed the couple paid an effective federal tax rate of about 13 percent on $5.5 million in income from the year before. (At first, Kerry only released his own tax return. He later released the first two pages of the tax return of his millionaire wife, Teresa Heinz.) Some conservatives, like Stephen Moore of the Club for Growth, used Kerrys effective tax rate to criticize him for his opposition to a flat tax that would raise his taxes."
Weasel Zippers » Blog Archive » Dems Say Romney Not Paying His Fair Share Seemingly Unaware John Kerry Was Paying a Lower Tax Rate When He Was Their Nominee
(But that was then, when "Greed (and Capitalism) was good" and John Kerry was the anti military, military antidote to the Presidency of the slacker George W Bush. Didn't Dan Rather, Mary Mapes and CBS tell us it was so. But today after this nights SOTU speech Kerry's tax rate is not to be mentioned, because Obama will tonight charge his followers to seek out those among their neighbors who have better jobs, nicer houses, bigger bank accounts, newer and more expensive cars and to immediately start throwing molotov cocktails through their windows, slit the throats of their children as they wait for the school buses in the morning and rape their wives as they leave to shop for the family groceries. The Great Democratic Uniter as extolled during the 2008 campaign, is finally going to bring this nation together in a mass orgy of envy, jealously, murder, fire, conflict, and destruction of property.)
"In 2004, John Kerry and his wife released portions of their separate tax returns that showed the couple paid an effective federal tax rate of about 13 percent on $5.5 million in income from the year before. (At first, Kerry only released his own tax return. He later released the first two pages of the tax return of his millionaire wife, Teresa Heinz.) Some conservatives, like Stephen Moore of the Club for Growth, used Kerry’s effective tax rate to criticize him for his opposition to a flat tax that would raise his taxes."
Weasel Zippers » Blog Archive » Dems Say Romney “Not Paying His Fair Share” – Seemingly Unaware John Kerry Was Paying a Lower Tax Rate When He Was Their Nominee…
Not the point.
Romney and/or Kerry (probably) isn't breaking any laws -
Although, its pretty crappy that he has so little commitment to his own country. He invests in other countries but not in the US?? -
Point is, the tax code is a disaster.
Republicans should bring it up when Kerry runs for reelection
Democrats are sure going to bring it up with Romney ( But so is Newt)
You voted for Kerry. And you dummies never said a word about all his Heinz cash. You're such a dishonest hypocrite.
(But that was then, when "Greed (and Capitalism) was good" and John Kerry was the anti military, military antidote to the Presidency of the slacker George W Bush. Didn't Dan Rather, Mary Mapes and CBS tell us it was so. But today after this nights SOTU speech Kerry's tax rate is not to be mentioned, because Obama will tonight charge his followers to seek out those among their neighbors who have better jobs, nicer houses, bigger bank accounts, newer and more expensive cars and to immediately start throwing molotov cocktails through their windows, slit the throats of their children as they wait for the school buses in the morning and rape their wives as . they leave to shop for the family groceries. The Great Democratic Uniter as extolled during the 2008 campaign, is finally going to bring this nation together in a mass orgy of envy, jealously, murder, fire, conflict, and destruction of property.)
"In 2004, John Kerry and his wife released portions of their separate tax returns that showed the couple paid an effective federal tax rate of about 13 percent on $5.5 million in income from the year before. (At first, Kerry only released his own tax return. He later released the first two pages of the tax return of his millionaire wife, Teresa Heinz.) Some conservatives, like Stephen Moore of the Club for Growth, used Kerrys effective tax rate to criticize him for his opposition to a flat tax that would raise his taxes."
Weasel Zippers » Blog Archive » Dems Say Romney Not Paying His Fair Share Seemingly Unaware John Kerry Was Paying a Lower Tax Rate When He Was Their Nominee
Kerry isn't running right now, Romney is.
And, before the collapse of Wall St., people kinda shined it on, but not any longer.
The POINT is that demonizing people for paying their taxes is wrong. And right now a lot of the left is doing JUST that. It is good to remind them they are living in glass houses as they throw those stones.
And of course the fact that a sitting President is attacking a large segment of the Country for the temerity to actual make more then others is simply unbelievable. He is trying to start class warfare on a National Bases to further HIS political career.
Do YOU think it's fair that the 1 percent pays half the taxes you do? I don't.
Besides........it was the tax cuts under Jr. that started this whole mess, and they were supposed to EXPIRE after 10 years if they didn't work.
Nope.........haven't seen 'em work since 2002.
Kerry is a rich Democrat. Democrats minimized his family's income when he ran. Romney is a rich Republican. Democrats are demonizing his campaign over wealth, although of that $21 million he earned, he paid $7 million to charity.Kerry isn't running right now, Romney is.
And, before the collapse of Wall St., people kinda shined it on, but not any longer.
Make up your mind about wealth.
I don't think wealth, per se, should influence voting. the person who wins votes should be judged by the content of his character, not what's in his wallet.
Personally? I'd like a president who understands this country and shares in it's burdens.
That means paying a tax rate of 28 percent like I do.
Otherwise, we go from being a democracy to being a plutocracy.
The POINT is that demonizing people for paying their taxes is wrong. And right now a lot of the left is doing JUST that. It is good to remind them they are living in glass houses as they throw those stones.
And of course the fact that a sitting President is attacking a large segment of the Country for the temerity to actual make more then others is simply unbelievable. He is trying to start class warfare on a National Bases to further HIS political career.
Do YOU think it's fair that the 1 percent pays half the taxes you do? I don't.
Besides........it was the tax cuts under Jr. that started this whole mess, and they were supposed to EXPIRE after 10 years if they didn't work.
Nope.........haven't seen 'em work since 2002.
do you think its fair 20% of the pop. gets money back after paying zero? and another 26% not paying ANYTHING either?
The Doctor Is In, it pays to read the link provided by the OP. It should answer the only part of your question about which I would know.Kerry is a rich Democrat. Democrats minimized his family's income when he ran. Romney is a rich Republican. Democrats are demonizing his campaign over wealth, although of that $21 million he earned, he paid $7 million to charity.Kerry isn't running right now, Romney is.
And, before the collapse of Wall St., people kinda shined it on, but not any longer.
Make up your mind about wealth.
I don't think wealth, per se, should influence voting. the person who wins votes should be judged by the content of his character, not what's in his wallet.
Who are these "Democrats" who are "demonizing" Romney?
Newt Gingrich is the one who's making hay of this. Not "Democrats".
(But that was then, when "Greed (and Capitalism) was good" and John Kerry was the anti military, military antidote to the Presidency of the slacker George W Bush. Didn't Dan Rather, Mary Mapes and CBS tell us it was so. But today after this nights SOTU speech Kerry's tax rate is not to be mentioned, because Obama will tonight charge his followers to seek out those among their neighbors who have better jobs, nicer houses, bigger bank accounts, newer and more expensive cars and to immediately start throwing molotov cocktails through their windows, slit the throats of their children as they wait for the school buses in the morning and rape their wives as they leave to shop for the family groceries. The Great Democratic Uniter as extolled during the 2008 campaign, is finally going to bring this nation together in a mass orgy of envy, jealously, murder, fire, conflict, and destruction of property.)
"In 2004, John Kerry and his wife released portions of their separate tax returns that showed the couple paid an effective federal tax rate of about 13 percent on $5.5 million in income from the year before. (At first, Kerry only released his own tax return. He later released the first two pages of the tax return of his millionaire wife, Teresa Heinz.) Some conservatives, like Stephen Moore of the Club for Growth, used Kerrys effective tax rate to criticize him for his opposition to a flat tax that would raise his taxes."
Weasel Zippers » Blog Archive » Dems Say Romney Not Paying His Fair Share Seemingly Unaware John Kerry Was Paying a Lower Tax Rate When He Was Their Nominee
The Doctor Is In, it pays to read the link provided by the OP. It should answer the only part of your question about which I would know.Kerry is a rich Democrat. Democrats minimized his family's income when he ran. Romney is a rich Republican. Democrats are demonizing his campaign over wealth, although of that $21 million he earned, he paid $7 million to charity.
Make up your mind about wealth.
I don't think wealth, per se, should influence voting. the person who wins votes should be judged by the content of his character, not what's in his wallet.
Who are these "Democrats" who are "demonizing" Romney?
Newt Gingrich is the one who's making hay of this. Not "Democrats".
The Link Provided by the OP.
The POINT is that demonizing people for paying their taxes is wrong. And right now a lot of the left is doing JUST that. It is good to remind them they are living in glass houses as they throw those stones.
And of course the fact that a sitting President is attacking a large segment of the Country for the temerity to actual make more then others is simply unbelievable. He is trying to start class warfare on a National Bases to further HIS political career.
Do YOU think it's fair that the 1 percent pays half the taxes you do? I don't.
Besides........it was the tax cuts under Jr. that started this whole mess, and they were supposed to EXPIRE after 10 years if they didn't work.
Nope.........haven't seen 'em work since 2002.
do you think its fair 20% of the pop. gets money back after paying zero? and another 26% not paying ANYTHING either?
Doesn't matter if he is running or not, hypocrisy is hypocrisy. If it is no big deal for kerry it is no big deal for Romney.Kerry isn't running right now, Romney is.
And, before the collapse of Wall St., people kinda shined it on, but not any longer.
Doesn't matter if he is running or not, hypocrisy is hypocrisy. If it is no big deal for kerry it is no big deal for Romney.Kerry isn't running right now, Romney is.
And, before the collapse of Wall St., people kinda shined it on, but not any longer.
