"The New York Times published an article over the weekend laying out a new original story for the FBI’s investigation into possible Trump campaign collusion with the Russian government. The infamous Steele dossier was not the catalyst for the investigation, according to four unnamed government officials who spoke to The Times. Rather, a drunken barroom conversation that Trump campaign adviser George Papadopoulos had with an Australian diplomat in London in May 2016 was what led to the FBI probe. Democrats and liberal pundits touted the story, which they said showed that Republicans have been overly focused on the dossier’s significance to the Russia investigation." So in response to the GOP's until-now-undisputed claim that the false document containing Russian Propaganda from a foreign agent through a firm working for the Russians was the entire reason, for the Mueller Investigation, Democrats Snowflakes are gleefully declaring the Dossier was NOT the reason at all - IT WAS THE RESULT OF A DRUNKEN CONVERSATION BETWEEN PAPADOPOLOUS AND AN AUSSIE DIPLOMAT. Oh yeah, a drunk guy in the pisser talking to a foreign diplomat is an iron-clad, legitimate, legal reason to stand up a stacked Special Counsel filled with Hillary / DNC donors, Hillary Lawyers, corrupt / criminally partisan FBI agents, and conduct a witch hunt for nearly a year resulting in ZERO EVIDENCE. BWUHAHAHAHA!!!! "Yes, your honor. We have a VERY good legal argument for conducting this Special Counsel Investigation of the President. What is the BASIS for this investigation? Well, see, a conversation was overheard in the bathroom between an extremely drunk guy and an Aussie Diplomat...." ‘Too Convenient’ — Republicans Question NYT’s Russia Probe Origin Story . . .