ClosedCaption
Diamond Member
- Sep 15, 2010
- 53,233
- 6,719
- 1,830
how is this?... if you want transparency for vetting, do it COMPLETELY.. there is no use doing it half assed or just focused on something YOUR agenda benefits from
So if you do it across the board and all the way, I am for it... if it is just this selective bullshit that is clearly agenda driven, then I am against it
I agree, so why do you think it's selective?
Jesus Christ... do I have to say it AGAIN..?? I have only posted it about 30 times this morning
Because it is ONLY focused around the tax return... and as pointed out, ain't it a coincidence that it is the target to attack Romney in the latest class warfare attempt??
If you want open vetting, do it ACROSS THE BOARD... tax returns, school records, employee reviews, military records, court records, driving records, THE WHOLE 9 YARDS
Ok, I didnt hear an argument against tax returns here. In fact it sounds like you are in favor of it but only under certain conditions that has not been customary in other elections. If they required all those things to be included, you would ask for more in an attempt to argue why none of those things should be asked for.
Every canidate has provided more than 2 years of tax returns....Romney is the first and it's a terrible precedent to set. But like Executive Privilege you'll be for it until a dem tries to do the same then you'll flip.