Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
And your not too bright for bragging up Flynn who wanted Trump to declare Martial Law because he lost the election. Flyn only believes in free elections when his guy wins because he a fascist & he's also a Nazi sympathizer. It's a shame that he still lives off the taxpayer's.Another "Platinum Member"
How did this shitbird become a "Platinum Member" admin?
I'm pretty new. You get to be a "Platinum Member" due to your thread and post count, right? It has nothing to do with merit.
Speaking of merit- Michael Flynn was a great United States Army general and is a great American. You are nothing but a "Platinum Member" on an anonymous message board.
MAGA
Godwin's LawAnd your not too bright for bragging up Flynn who wanted Trump to declare Martial Law because he lost the election. Flyn only believes in free elections when his guy wins because he a fascist & he's also a Nazi sympathizer. It's a shame that he still lives off the taxpayer's.
www.dictionary.com
Democrats aren’t buying a yearslong, independent investigation’s findings that the FBI lacked “actual evidence” to justify its probe into whether Donald Trump colluded with Russians to win the 2016 presidential election.
Democrats on Capitol Hill said Tuesday that the report by special counsel John Durham is “a huge nothingburger” and “flat-out wrong” in its conclusion that the FBI based its decision to surveil the Trump campaign on shoddy, uncorroborated intelligence.
They said Mr. Trump aligns himself with Russian President Vladimir Putin even as he leads the 2024 Republican presidential primary field.
No remorse: Democrats stick to Trump-Russia collusion claims despite Durham report
Democrats aren’t buying a yearslong, independent investigation’s findings that the FBI lacked “actual evidence” to justify its probe into whether Donald Trump colluded with Russians to win the 2016 presidential election.www.washingtontimes.com
Democratic Rep. Adam Schiff went on repeated media tours and sounded off on the House floor following the 2016 election, claiming there was "plenty of evidence of collusion or conspiracy in plain sight" regarding the Trump campaign and Russia — a false claim originally approved and advanced by failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.
Schiff's thoroughly discredited claims now appear to be even more damning in light of the release of the final version of special counsel John Durham's report.
Democratic Rep. Adam Schiff went on repeated media tours and sounded off on the House floor following the 2016 election, claiming there was "plenty of evidence of collusion or conspiracy in plain sight" regarding the Trump campaign and Russia — a false claim originally approved and advanced by failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.
Schiff's thoroughly discredited claims now appear to be even more damning in light of the release of the final version of special counsel John Durham's report.
Law professor asks Adam Schiff to show his phantasmal evidence of Russian collusion after Durham report reveals FBI investigation was baseless | Blaze Media
Democratic Rep. Adam Schiff went on repeated media tours and sounded off on the House floor following the 2016 election, claiming there was "plenty of evidence of collusion or conspiracy in plain sight" regarding the Trump campaign and Russia — a false claim originally approved and advanced by...www.theblaze.com
Comment:
Deep denial of reality is one of the things that makes the corrupt Democrat Party such a dangerous political cult.
They used the FBI and DOJ to frame a Trump with their crazy Russian Collusion Conspiracy.
This is a historical political scandal, and the Left-Wing Press is trying to bury it.
You do realize your Vegetable Messiah had the same number of draft deferments as Trump, right?Gee, that looks just like Commander Bonespurs.
Flynn is a traiterous lowlife scumbag who's ass is owned by Trump for keeping him out of prison. Pentagon brass should have yanked his pension a long time ago for being a traitor.
Godwin's Law
Godwin’s law Meme | Meaning & History | Dictionary.com
Godwin’s law is the proposition that the longer an internet argument goes on, the higher the probability becomes that something or someone will be compared to Adolf Hitler.
How unoriginal and stupid you are.
MAGA
"Unoriginal"? Trump stole the MAGA slogan from Reagen, dope.
Did Trump have bonespurs? Funny he couldn't remember which foot it was when asked about it.You do realize your Vegetable Messiah had the same number of draft deferments as Trump, right?
And they were all for asthma, while he was busy playing college football.
Who?Yet amazingly the Trump braintrust was convicted of the multiple contacts.
Schiff is right; the multiple contacts between the Trump campaign and the former Soviets were well documented as was (gee what a coincidence) Russian interference in the 2016 election.
Mueller ascertained that "collusion" isn't any crime.In this case, what is the definition of "collusion"?
And what did they get? Trump was far harder on Russia than Biden ever was until the Ukraine war came along.But was there communication with the Trump staffers hoping to gain some kind of political advantage? Yes.
Yet a great many innocent people are convicted of things every year.We know that. Some were convicted of it.
Kinda like Biden. Has the guy tried talking peace with Putin for even 5 minutes in the past year? No. Biden WANTS war.Any talk of Russia is dismissed. It just has to be all or nothing, this one or that one.
Did Tater have asthma while playing college football?
Gee Candycornhole! You did good on this post! Out of 14 responses, you found two idiots actually not laughing in your face.
your post conclusion is not supported by Page 98 quotePage 98 of the Durham report. No one in the government was coordinating with or working with the intent of furthering the Clinton campaign.
View attachment 786376
The post blows up the stupid accusations that the DoJ was “in on it”your post conclusion is not supported by Page 98 quote
no actually not at all. It’s states that when using the burden of proof required to convict people of crimes the entire DOJ couldn’t be found guilty…but doesn’t say anything about individual agents…and also presume as lesser burden of proof, such as one for a civil lawsuit, they would be guilty…if there was no evidence they would if states so…they didn’t, they used this specific language.The post blows up the stupid accusations that the DoJ was “in on it”
It says there was no evidence for ANY official, so yeah it talks about individuals.no actually not at all. It’s states that when using the burden of proof required to convict people of crimes the entire DOJ couldn’t be found guilty…but doesn’t say anything about individual agents…and also presume as lesser burden of proof, such as one for a civil lawsuit, they would be guilty…if there was no evidence they would if states so…they didn’t, they used this specific language.
once again you fail to comprehend
no it doesn’t say there is no evidenceIt says there was no evidence for ANY official, so yeah it talks about individuals.
Sorry to burst your bubble but the burden of proof is a fundamental aspect of our legal system. You don’t get to ignore it.
Total exoneration.
I’m going with the Trump standard.no it doesn’t say there is no evidence
