Why do you believe that?Well are they human constructs or did they construct humans - - your initial definition implied both but that's not sound.Ok, so back to your definition, then - - - a point of clarification.Just an analogy. That sim theory seems kind of ridiculous to me.
You are using God in two different ways - first, you use it as a human construct...then you follow by saying that the construct is made to carry out "God's" will.
If you're not defining God in two different ways...then how that reads to me is that Humans invented God (construct) to do what their invention wants them to do...
That's how I mean it. I see gods in the same way I see human minds, but they are distributed minds - existing in the network of like-minded believers. I came to see it this way after studying how systems can have emergent attributes that act independently of the intent of any individual members of the system.
I know it sounds like I'm dismissing gods as "made up", but that's not my intent. I think they are very real things, with a very real presence. But they have no physical representation outside the actions of believers. They are truly non-material beings. So are we, for that matter.
They evolved alongside humans, as a by-product of human minds and society.
I saw it in a vision.
I don't.And how do you reconcile it with the origin questions?